發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-09 12:42

  本文選題：行政決策責(zé)任 + 歸責(zé)��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 隨著“依法行政”與“責(zé)任政府”理念的深入人心,實(shí)現(xiàn)行政決策的科學(xué)化、民主化與法治化已成為現(xiàn)代民主憲政的要求。然而,基于行政決策的特殊性,行政決策責(zé)任一直被理論界所忽視,更缺乏對(duì)其系統(tǒng)的研究。行政決策責(zé)任理論研究的缺失,致使行政決策責(zé)任追究制度缺乏理論指導(dǎo),進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致行政決策行為失范現(xiàn)象頻發(fā)。為了強(qiáng)化以責(zé)任規(guī)范行政決策行為的作用,進(jìn)而實(shí)現(xiàn)行政決策之法治化,行政決策責(zé)任之法治化研究開始為世人所關(guān)注。 文章首先從行政決策責(zé)任之一般理論入手,通過分析國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)于行政決策與行政決策責(zé)任的諸多觀點(diǎn),厘定了行政決策與行政決策責(zé)任的概念,確定了行政決策的行政行為性質(zhì),探討了追究行政決策責(zé)任的法理依據(jù)與行政決策責(zé)任的法理構(gòu)成,為追究行政決策責(zé)任尋求理論支撐。而后以行政決策責(zé)任之一般理論為基石,論述了行政決策責(zé)任之基本歸責(zé)原則,主張建立以正當(dāng)程序責(zé)任原則為主,以違法責(zé)任原則與過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則為輔的行政決策責(zé)任之多元基本歸責(zé)原則體系,為認(rèn)定與歸結(jié)行政決策責(zé)任提供原則性指導(dǎo)。論文始終以行政決策責(zé)任之法治化為主題,梳理了行政決策責(zé)任之現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)范,并進(jìn)行評(píng)析,找出了行政決策責(zé)任在行政決策法治化進(jìn)程中的不足。最后針對(duì)行政決策責(zé)任存在的缺陷,從行政決策責(zé)任承擔(dān)之主體、行政決策行為失誤與否的評(píng)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、行政決策責(zé)任之承擔(dān)方式以及問責(zé)機(jī)制等方面提出了完善我國(guó)行政決策責(zé)任制度之具體設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:With the concept of "administration according to law" and "responsible government" deeply rooted in the hearts of the people and the realization of scientific administrative decision-making, democratization and rule of law have become the requirements of modern democratic constitutionalism. However, due to the particularity of administrative decision, the responsibility of administrative decision has been neglected by the theoretical circle. The lack of theoretical research on administrative decision-making responsibility leads to the lack of theoretical guidance on the accountability system of administrative decision making, which leads to the frequent occurrence of administrative decision-making behavior irregularity. In order to strengthen the function of standardizing administrative decision-making behavior with responsibility and realizing the rule of law in administrative decision making, the research on the rule of law of administrative decision responsibility begins with the general theory of administrative decision responsibility. Based on the analysis of many viewpoints of scholars at home and abroad on administrative decision making and administrative decision responsibility, the concept of administrative decision making and administrative decision responsibility is defined, and the nature of administrative action of administrative decision is determined. This paper probes into the legal basis of investigating administrative decision responsibility and the legal principle constitution of administrative decision responsibility, and seeks theoretical support for investigating administrative decision responsibility. Then, based on the general theory of administrative decision-making responsibility, this paper discusses the basic principle of imputation of administrative decision-making responsibility, and advocates the establishment of the principle of due process responsibility. The multi-element basic imputation principle system of administrative decision responsibility, supplemented by the principle of illegal liability and fault liability, provides principled guidance for the determination and resolution of administrative decision-making responsibility. The thesis always takes the rule of law of the administrative decision responsibility as the theme, combs the current legal norm of the administrative decision responsibility, carries on the appraisal, and finds out the insufficiency of the administrative decision responsibility in the process of the administrative decision-making rule by law. Finally, aiming at the defects of administrative decision-making responsibility, from the main body of administrative decision-making responsibility, the evaluation standard of administrative decision-making behavior error or not, The assumption of administrative decision-making responsibility and accountability mechanism are put forward to perfect the system of administrative decision responsibility in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 乞立卓;;淺析無效擔(dān)保合同的責(zé)任承擔(dān)[J];青春歲月;2011年18期

2 郭佳穎;;從行政決策與執(zhí)行角度理解上有政策下有對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)視角(中旬);2011年03期

3 馬桔紅;;關(guān)于公眾行政決策參與的思考[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年09期

4 范盈盈;;淺析“上有政策,下有對(duì)策”之動(dòng)因及政策建議——著眼于行政決策、行政執(zhí)行、行政監(jiān)督[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2011年18期

5 鄧慧強(qiáng);;行政決策被傳統(tǒng)行政法理論遮蔽原因之比較分析[J];邵陽(yáng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

6 劉珍;;淺析仲裁員的責(zé)任承擔(dān)[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2011年09期

7 宋艷慧;周蘭領(lǐng);;重大行政決策合法性審查的主體模式及其選擇[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué);2011年21期

8 鮑俊紅;;“酒后代駕”行業(yè)法律問題分析及對(duì)策[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年15期

9 吳O途，

本文編號(hào)：1999762