本文選題：法治 + 法治建設(shè)　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 法律的生命在于實(shí)踐,然而當(dāng)法律從文本走向?qū)嵺`之后,籠罩在法律之上的神圣光環(huán)便褪去了光彩。其中,法律的確定性問題和裁判的可接受性問題,直接影響著法律權(quán)威和法律信仰的樹立,使得法治成立的條件“良法之治”和“普遍服從”都無法具備。法律方法的研究有助于消除法律的不確定性,滿足法律穩(wěn)定性的要求,增強(qiáng)裁判的可接受性,從而使法律不僅僅得到法律職業(yè)群體的信仰,也能獲得普通公眾的認(rèn)可和尊重,實(shí)現(xiàn)“良法之治”和“普遍服從”。 本文包括以下五個(gè)部分： 引言：簡(jiǎn)要介紹我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的歷程,提出本文研究的主題——如何通過司法過程中法律方法的運(yùn)用來解決法治建設(shè)中存在的問題。 第一部分：介紹法治和法律方法的基本概念及理論。分為兩個(gè)部分： 首先,簡(jiǎn)要介紹法治的經(jīng)典概念,即亞里士多德關(guān)于法治的兩重含義——良法之治和普遍服從。 其次,概括介紹法律方法的概念、種類、特征以及法律方法對(duì)法治的一般意義。 第二部分：探討法治建設(shè)對(duì)法律方法的依賴。分為兩個(gè)部分： 首先,分析我國(guó)法治建設(shè)中存在的主要問題,即法律的確定性問題,裁判的可接受性問題以及法律信仰缺失的問題。 其次,分析法律方法如何解決法治建設(shè)中所存在的主要問題,闡明法律方法可以增強(qiáng)法律的確定性,增強(qiáng)裁判的可接受性,樹立法律權(quán)威,培育法律信仰。 第三部分：分析法律方法在促進(jìn)法治建設(shè)時(shí)的不足和完善。分為兩個(gè)部分：首先,分析其不足之處,主要有以下兩個(gè)方面,一是法律方法的理論研究的不成熟,二是法律方法相關(guān)規(guī)則及制度的缺失。 其次,提出相應(yīng)的完善措施,分為四個(gè)方面闡述,一是深化法律方法的理論研究,二是完善相關(guān)的規(guī)則及制度建設(shè),三是提高法律從業(yè)人員的職業(yè)技能,四是探討法律方法以外對(duì)法治建設(shè)具有重要影響的其他方面。 結(jié)語：概括本文的主要觀點(diǎn),分析本文的不足之處,提出進(jìn)一步深入研究的建議及其意義。
[Abstract]:The life of law lies in practice, but when law moves from text to practice, the hallowed aura of law wears off its luster. Among them, the certainty of law and the acceptability of judgment directly affect the establishment of legal authority and legal belief, and make the conditions for the establishment of the rule of law to be "good law governance" and "universal servitude" can not be possessed. The research of legal methods helps to eliminate the uncertainty of the law, meet the requirement of legal stability, enhance the acceptability of the judge, so that the law can be recognized and respected not only by the legal profession group, but also by the general public. To achieve "good law governance" and "universal obedience." This article consists of the following five parts: Introduction: this paper briefly introduces the course of the construction of the rule of law in our country, and puts forward the theme of this paper, that is, how to solve the problems existing in the construction of the rule of law through the application of the legal methods in the judicial process. The first part introduces the basic concepts and theories of the rule of law and legal methods. Divided into two parts: First, the classical concept of rule of law is briefly introduced, that is, Aristotle's dual meaning of rule of law-the rule of good law and universal servitude. Secondly, it introduces the concept, category, characteristics and general significance of legal method to rule by law. The second part discusses the dependence of legal method on the construction of rule of law. Divided into two parts: First of all, it analyzes the main problems in the construction of the rule of law in China, that is, the certainty of law, the acceptability of adjudication and the lack of legal belief. Secondly, it analyzes how the legal methods solve the main problems in the construction of the rule of law, and clarifies that the legal method can enhance the legal certainty, enhance the acceptability of the referee, establish the legal authority and cultivate the legal belief. The third part analyzes the deficiency and perfection of legal method in promoting the construction of rule of law. It is divided into two parts: first, it analyzes its shortcomings, mainly in the following two aspects: the first is the immaturity of the theoretical study of legal methods, and the second is the lack of relevant rules and systems of legal methods. Secondly, it puts forward the corresponding improvement measures, which are divided into four aspects: one is to deepen the theoretical study of legal methods, the other is to improve the relevant rules and system construction, and the third is to improve the professional skills of legal practitioners. Fourth, explore the other aspects that have important influence on the construction of the rule of law besides the legal methods. Conclusion: this paper summarizes the main points of view, analyzes the shortcomings of this paper, and puts forward suggestions for further study and its significance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葛洪義;;法律方法的性質(zhì)與作用——兼論法律的結(jié)構(gòu)及其客觀性[J];法律方法與法律思維;2005年00期

2 陳金釗;;法律方法引論[J];法律方法;2003年00期

3 石茂生;;論法治概念的實(shí)質(zhì)要素——評(píng)亞里士多德的法治思想[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

4 陳金釗,吳丙新,焦寶乾,桑本謙;關(guān)于“法律方法與法治”的對(duì)話[J];法學(xué);2003年05期

5 魏勝?gòu)?qiáng);;我國(guó)需要制定統(tǒng)一的法律解釋法[J];法學(xué);2007年01期

6 劉旺洪;;法律信仰與法制現(xiàn)代化[J];法制現(xiàn)代化研究;1996年00期

7 姚建宗;信仰:法治的精神意蘊(yùn)[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

8 石茂生;論法律信仰[J];南都學(xué)壇;2002年02期

9 魏勝?gòu)?qiáng);;有關(guān)“法律發(fā)現(xiàn)”的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];理論探索;2008年02期

10 韓邦舜;李德仁;;也論刑事訴訟理念[J];內(nèi)蒙古民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1794326