本文選題：民主失效　切入點(diǎn)：總統(tǒng)制　出處：《國外社會科學(xué)》2017年01期

【摘要】：林茨的民主失效理論從政治過程、民主價值和權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)視角分析了總統(tǒng)制與議會制在體制運(yùn)行上的差異;從政黨品質(zhì)與領(lǐng)袖品質(zhì)、總統(tǒng)制與多數(shù)主義窘境、視覺政治與民主價值淪喪這幾個視角探討了民主體制失效的原因,在總統(tǒng)制與議會制運(yùn)行軌跡與運(yùn)行結(jié)果分析的基礎(chǔ)上,形成了兩類體制失效的挽救思路。西方的民主失效理論如不能跳出西式選舉民主的定勢,而僅從體制比較中找尋差異,并結(jié)合政治生活現(xiàn)實(shí)進(jìn)行差異的歸納與因果的嫁接,實(shí)質(zhì)上存在根深蒂固的邏輯困境,自然無法從根本上厘清西式民主失效的原因。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of political process, democratic value and power structure, Linz's theory of democratic invalidation analyzes the differences between the presidential system and the parliamentary system in the operation of the system, the quality of the political party and the leadership, the dilemma between the presidential system and the majoritarianism.This paper probes into the causes of the failure of democratic system from the perspective of the loss of visual politics and democratic value. On the basis of the analysis of the running track and the operating results of the presidential and parliamentary systems, it forms a saving idea for the failure of the two kinds of systems.If the western theory of democratic invalidation cannot jump out of the fixed trend of Western-style electoral democracy, but only look for differences in the comparison of systems, and combine the reality of political life with the induction of differences and the grafting of causality, there is in essence a deep-rooted logical dilemma.Naturally, it is impossible to fundamentally clarify the reasons for the failure of western democracy.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)政治與公共管理學(xué)院;蘇州大學(xué)"新型城鎮(zhèn)化與社會治理"江蘇協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;
【基金】：“新型城鎮(zhèn)化與社會治理”江蘇協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心、江蘇省高校優(yōu)勢學(xué)科“政治學(xué)”建設(shè)工程資助
【分類號】：D033.3;D082
，

本文編號：1713413