本文選題：法治　切入點(diǎn)：中國特色社會(huì)主義法治　出處：《吉首大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：黨的十八屆四中全會(huì)提出了建設(shè)中國特色社會(huì)主義法治理論,我國是一個(gè)多民族的國家,少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法并沒有因?yàn)榉ㄖ蔚默F(xiàn)代化而消失,一些少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法仍然根深蒂固,努力挖掘中國本土法治資源,繼承與超越少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法,轉(zhuǎn)向傳統(tǒng)的內(nèi)向型法治,是中國法治的難題所在,也是中國法治的希望所在。本文立足于中國特色社會(huì)主義法治理論,采用文獻(xiàn)研究法、定性分析法、比較分析方法、田野考察方法等對(duì)我國少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法的內(nèi)外價(jià)值做了一番較為系統(tǒng)的探討。第一部分對(duì)法治理論進(jìn)行解讀。首先,對(duì)法治的概念進(jìn)行分析,指出法治即是良法之治,良法的獲得不僅僅源于國家制定法,道德習(xí)慣也可以成為良法的淵源,為文章最后的結(jié)論作出理論鋪墊。其次,對(duì)法治的實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑進(jìn)行探討,分析了法治實(shí)現(xiàn)的三種途徑即本土資源道路、法律移植道路及混合道路,并指出我國應(yīng)該采用本土資源和法律移植的混合途徑來實(shí)現(xiàn)中國特色社會(huì)主義法治,在法治本土資源中,少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法不可缺失。第二部分對(duì)少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法的基本理論進(jìn)行梳理。首先界定了少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法的概念,并將少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法與其他相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行比較,指出少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法是少數(shù)民族人民在長(zhǎng)期生活當(dāng)中形成的成文或不成文的約束他們行為的習(xí)慣規(guī)范。其次對(duì)我國少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法產(chǎn)生的歷史原因及存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)理由進(jìn)行了分析,指出少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法的存在有其深厚的歷史原因和現(xiàn)實(shí)理由。最后對(duì)我國少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法的身份和地位進(jìn)行定位,指出我國少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法是法的一種。第三部分討論分析了少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法存在的內(nèi)在法的價(jià)值。指出少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法天然存在法的一些基本價(jià)值,即法的秩序價(jià)值、效率價(jià)值、公平價(jià)值和正義價(jià)值。第四部分探討分析了少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法在我國社會(huì)主義法治建設(shè)中的外在價(jià)值。指出少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法在我國社會(huì)主義法治建設(shè)中具有國家制定法中的補(bǔ)充價(jià)值、司法中的調(diào)整價(jià)值、守法中的教育價(jià)值及社會(huì)治理中的裁判價(jià)值。第五部分提出了提升我國少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法價(jià)值的具體措施。首先對(duì)少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法中的消極價(jià)值進(jìn)行化解和取締;其次是處理少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法與國家制定法的關(guān)系;第三對(duì)少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法的司法應(yīng)用進(jìn)行規(guī)范;最后對(duì)少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法進(jìn)行法治化歸引。
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward the theory of building a socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics. China is a multi-ethnic country, and the customary laws of ethnic minorities have not disappeared because of the modernization of the rule of law, and some of the customary laws of ethnic minorities are still deeply rooted. It is a difficult problem for the rule of law in China to make great efforts to excavate the resources of the rule of law in China, inherit and transcend the customary laws of ethnic minorities and turn to the traditional introverted rule of law. It is also the hope of the rule of law in China. Based on the theory of the rule of law of socialism with Chinese characteristics, this paper adopts the methods of literature research, qualitative analysis and comparative analysis. The methods of field investigation and so on have made a relatively systematic discussion on the internal and external value of the customary law of ethnic minorities in China. The first part is the interpretation of the theory of rule of law. First, the concept of the rule of law is analyzed, and it is pointed out that the rule of law is the governance of good law. The acquisition of good law not only comes from the national law, but also the moral habit can become the source of good law, which lays a theoretical foundation for the final conclusion of the article. Secondly, it discusses the way to realize the rule of law. This paper analyzes three ways to realize the rule of law, that is, the local resource road, the law transplant road and the mixed road, and points out that our country should adopt the mixed approach of local resources and law transplantation to realize the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics. In the local resources of the rule of law, the customary law of ethnic minorities can not be missing. The second part combs the basic theory of the customary law of ethnic minorities. Firstly, it defines the concept of customary law of ethnic minorities. And compare the customary law of national minorities with other relevant concepts, It is pointed out that the customary law of ethnic minorities is a written or unwritten customary norm formed by the people of ethnic minorities in their long life. Secondly, the historical reasons and the reality of the existence of customary law of ethnic minorities in China are discussed. The reasons are analysed, It is pointed out that the existence of the customary law of ethnic minorities has its profound historical reasons and practical reasons. Finally, the identity and status of the customary law of ethnic minorities in China are defined. It is pointed out that the customary law of ethnic minorities is a kind of law in our country. The third part discusses and analyzes the value of the inherent law of the existence of customary law of ethnic minorities, and points out some basic values of the natural existence law of the customary law of ethnic minorities, that is, the order value of law. Efficiency value, The fourth part discusses and analyzes the external value of minority customary law in the construction of socialist rule of law in our country, and points out that the customary law of minority nationality has the state system in the construction of socialist rule of law in our country. Supplementary values in the Decision-making Act, The value of adjustment in the administration of justice, The fifth part puts forward the concrete measures to promote the value of minority customary law in our country. The second is to deal with the relationship between the customary law of ethnic minorities and the national law; the third is to regulate the judicial application of the customary law of ethnic minorities; finally, to regulate the customary law of ethnic minorities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉首大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D920.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳俊伶;;淺議民族習(xí)慣法與國家制定法的沖突與融合[J];法制與社會(huì);2016年10期

2 劉婕;;法治的法理之義[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年26期

3 王利明;;法治:良法與善治[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

4 楊庭;周本炎;;侗族寨老組織在農(nóng)村社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新中的作用研究[J];西安建筑科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

5 王飛;吳大華;;少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法的當(dāng)代法治意蘊(yùn)研究[J];銅仁學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

6 巫洪才;;中國少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法10年研究之述評(píng)與反思[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2013年03期

7 楊平;;近十年來中國少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法研究綜述[J];蘭州交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

8 楊百勝;;法治新論:法治是良法之治和人民之治的統(tǒng)一[J];湖北大學(xué)成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

9 劉侃侃;;少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法的概念、功能之我見[J];群文天地;2011年14期

10 付羅芬;;龐德社會(huì)控制理論研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年33期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳根強(qiáng);江澤民法治思想研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 沈佳越;試論我國判例制度的司法推進(jìn)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2013年

2 張晶晶;論習(xí)慣法與國家法的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2013年

3 譚麗麗;我國法律淵源中的習(xí)慣研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

4 邵萍;少數(shù)民族習(xí)慣法與行政法治關(guān)系研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2010年

5 曾田田;習(xí)慣法作為民法淵源問題的研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

6 張坤鋒;論建設(shè)中國特色社會(huì)主義的治國方略[D];電子科技大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1665000