【摘要】：筆者在借助路易斯·阿爾都塞(Louis Althusser,1918-1990)的問題式(Problematic)研究范式考察葛蘭西“文化霸權(quán)”與時代歷史關(guān)聯(lián)及“文化霸權(quán)”建構(gòu)的基礎(chǔ)上,通過思想與行動控制權(quán)這一中介,分析“文化霸權(quán)”與群體意識形態(tài)的內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)。一方面,“文化霸權(quán)”與思想行動控制權(quán)以“同意”和“服從”為基礎(chǔ),內(nèi)在地具有共通性關(guān)聯(lián)；另一方面,群體意識形態(tài)內(nèi)在地具有型塑思想與行動控制權(quán)的功能。因此,在總體意義,“文化霸權(quán)”與群體意識形之間具備特定的共通感關(guān)聯(lián),即二者都指向思想與行動控制權(quán)的型塑。在明確了“文化霸權(quán)”與群體意識形態(tài)的總體性關(guān)聯(lián)的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者基于既定意義上和動態(tài)生成意義兩個角度,分別探討“文化霸權(quán)”與群體意識形態(tài)的具體關(guān)聯(lián)。在既定意義上,“文化霸權(quán)”與特定的群體意識形態(tài)之間具有以對抗性為主,同時彼此吸納、涵攝的關(guān)聯(lián)；在動態(tài)生成意義上,“文化霸權(quán)”的初生形態(tài)——智識道德的集團(tuán)性統(tǒng)一,與特定的群體意識形態(tài)具有融合、涵攝及運動路徑相似性的關(guān)聯(lián)。因此,“文化霸權(quán)”與群體意識形態(tài)的內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)表現(xiàn)為兩個層次、三個方面：在總體層面,“文化霸權(quán)”與群體意識形態(tài)具有以思想行動控制權(quán)為基礎(chǔ)的共通性關(guān)聯(lián)；在具體層面,既定意義上的“文化霸權(quán)”與特定的群體意識形態(tài)具有以對抗性為主要內(nèi)容的關(guān)聯(lián)；在動態(tài)生成意義上,“文化霸權(quán)”與特定的群體意識形態(tài)具有融合、吸納、涵攝及運動路徑相似性的關(guān)聯(lián)。 在論題研究過程中,筆者還嘗試性地作出與論題相關(guān)的自主探索研究。對“同意”與“服從”這一政治心理現(xiàn)象展開了類別研究：筆者認(rèn)為,“同意”與“服從”包括誘導(dǎo)——認(rèn)同、強制——服從和無意識同意這三種類型；對于群體意識形態(tài)這一特定的意識形態(tài)現(xiàn)象展開了其存在維度和特性的研究：筆者認(rèn)為,群體意識形態(tài)就其存在維度而言,包括思想——本體維度和行為——實踐維度。就其特性而言,群體意識形態(tài)除了具備境域性、公度性等特點之外,還具有擴(kuò)張性特點。群體意識形態(tài)的存在維度自然延伸為對思想控制權(quán)與行動控制權(quán)的型塑。群體意識形態(tài)的擴(kuò)張性既源于群體意識形態(tài)的基礎(chǔ)——共同利益的擴(kuò)張性,同時又源于群體意識形態(tài)內(nèi)在功能——思想與行動控制權(quán)的型塑。群體意識形態(tài)的擴(kuò)張性使其產(chǎn)生了特定的擴(kuò)張運動,即由作為臣屬狀態(tài)的社會多元意識形態(tài)向作為具有社會統(tǒng)治地位和權(quán)威的社會一元主流意識形態(tài)的上升和擴(kuò)張。 在論題研究之外,筆者簡要說明了“文化霸權(quán)”與群體意識形態(tài)內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)的理論思辨研究對當(dāng)下中國,共產(chǎn)黨執(zhí)政統(tǒng)治的現(xiàn)實意義。
[Abstract]:On the basis of investigating the relationship between Gramsci's "cultural hegemony" and the historical relationship of the times and the construction of "cultural hegemony" with the help of Louis Althusser,1918-1990 's problem (Problematic) research paradigm, the author analyzes the internal relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology through the intermediary of thought and action control. On the one hand, "cultural hegemony" and the control of thought and action are based on "consent" and "obedience", which are inherently related to each other; on the other hand, group ideology has the function of shaping thought and controlling action. Therefore, in the overall sense, there is a specific sense of common sense between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology, that is, both of them point to the shaping of the control right of thought and action. On the basis of defining the overall relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology, the author discusses the specific relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology from two angles: the established meaning and the dynamic generating meaning. In the established sense, there is a relationship between "cultural hegemony" and specific group ideology, which is mainly antagonistic, absorbed and contained by each other at the same time; in the sense of dynamic generation, the group unity of intellectual morality, the primary form of "cultural hegemony", is related to the integration of specific group ideology, including the similarity of movement path. Therefore, the internal relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology is manifested in two levels, three aspects: at the overall level, "cultural hegemony" and group ideology have a common relationship based on the control right of thought and action, at the specific level, "cultural hegemony" in the established sense is related to the specific group ideology with antagonism as the main content, and the relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology is based on the control of thought and action, and the relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology is based on the control of thought and action. In the sense of dynamic generation, "cultural hegemony" is related to the integration, absorption, inclusion and similarity of movement paths with specific group ideology. In the process of topic research, the author also tries to make independent exploration and research related to the topic. This paper studies the political psychological phenomena of "consent" and "obedience": the author believes that "consent" and "obedience" include three types: induction-identity, forced-obedience and unconscious consent; For the specific ideological phenomenon of group ideology, its existence dimension and characteristics are studied: the author believes that group ideology includes thought-ontology dimension and behavior-practice dimension as far as its existence dimension is concerned. As far as its characteristics are concerned, group ideology not only has the characteristics of localization and justice, but also has the characteristics of expansion. The existence dimension of group ideology naturally extends to the shaping of ideological control and action control. The expansion of group ideology originates not only from the expansion of common interests, which is the basis of group ideology, but also from the shaping of the internal function of group ideology, the control right of thought and action. The expansion of group ideology makes it produce a specific expansion movement, that is, the rise and expansion from the social pluralistic ideology as a subordinate state to the social unitary mainstream ideology with social dominance and authority. In addition to the research on the topic, the author briefly explains the practical significance of the theoretical speculative research on the internal relationship between "cultural hegemony" and group ideology to the ruling rule of the Communist Party in China at present.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D252

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王巖;職業(yè)體育聯(lián)盟的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[D];上海體育學(xué)院;2010年

2 吳瑛;中國話語權(quán)生產(chǎn)機(jī)制研究[D];上海外國語大學(xué);2010年

3 蘇勇;解構(gòu)批評：形態(tài)與價值[D];江西師范大學(xué);2010年

4 趙一強;知識社會價值的道德分析[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

5 楊素秋;“文革文學(xué)”與“新時期文學(xué)”的關(guān)聯(lián)研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

6 黃芳;跨語際文學(xué)實踐中的多元文化認(rèn)同[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

7 李國娟;儒學(xué)與秦漢意識形態(tài)的建立[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

8 張紅峰;大學(xué)組織變革中的博弈分析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

9 楊玲;文化交往論[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

10 張海斌;轉(zhuǎn)型社會中的鄉(xiāng)村自治與法治[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2502442