【摘要】：對(duì)于馬克思人的本質(zhì)的思想來源的研究，傳統(tǒng)的觀念一般局限在黑格爾和費(fèi)爾巴哈上，但是實(shí)際上，德國(guó)古典哲學(xué)特別是康德哲學(xué)也為馬克思的人的本質(zhì)思想的形成和發(fā)展提供了豐富的理論基礎(chǔ)，但是近年來馬克思對(duì)康德哲學(xué)的繼承和發(fā)展的研究并不多見，因而對(duì)這一問題的研究就顯得尤為重要，，研究馬克思對(duì)康德的繼承和超越一方面會(huì)使我們對(duì)康德哲學(xué)的歷史意義獲得充分的了解，另一方面也能夠使馬克思哲學(xué)人的本質(zhì)思想的來源得到完整的說明。本文從康德與馬克思的人的本質(zhì)問題的幾個(gè)方面入手，指出馬克思對(duì)其思想的繼承和超越，從而確立馬克思人本質(zhì)思想在哲學(xué)史上的核心地位。
[Abstract]:For the study of the origin of Marx's human nature, the traditional ideas are generally confined to Hegel and Feuerbach, but in fact, German classical philosophy, especially Kant's philosophy, also provides a rich theoretical basis for the formation and development of Marx's human essence thought. However, in recent years, Marx's research on the inheritance and development of Kant's philosophy is rare. Therefore, it is particularly important to study this issue. On the one hand, the study of Marx's inheritance and transcendence of Kant will make us fully understand the historical significance of Kant's philosophy. On the other hand, it can explain the origin of Marxist philosophical human essence thought. Starting from several aspects of Kant's and Marx's human essence, this paper points out Marx's inheritance and transcendence of his thought, thus establishing the core position of Marx's human essence thought in the history of philosophy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：A811;B038

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬國(guó)柱;馬克思審美觀對(duì)康德審美觀的超越──“形式的合目的性”與“人也按照美的規(guī)律來建造”之比較[J];遼寧教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年02期

2 周膺;繞不過去[J];w

本文編號(hào)：2211450