【摘要】：考查馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家與農(nóng)民相關(guān)的文本發(fā)現(xiàn):盡管恩格斯和列寧對(duì)農(nóng)民的分類有所差異,但是從本質(zhì)上都是按照經(jīng)營(yíng)性質(zhì)作為分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn),其文本中重點(diǎn)考察的對(duì)象具有內(nèi)在的一致性,即在經(jīng)營(yíng)性質(zhì)處于被剝削地位的、人數(shù)眾多的農(nóng)業(yè)小生產(chǎn)者這類農(nóng)民。他們表現(xiàn)出作為小生產(chǎn)者在經(jīng)濟(jì)上的根深蒂固的私有性、在政治影響上的被行政權(quán)力支配性和在思想上具有落后保守性,這些屬性相輔相成、相互促進(jìn)。并且,馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家在不同程度上指出,農(nóng)業(yè)小生產(chǎn)者將逐漸走向衰落和終結(jié)或分化,提出向合作社的生產(chǎn)和占有的方向改造或在取得政權(quán)以后逐步發(fā)展集體所有制。
[Abstract]:A review of the texts of Marxist classic writers related to farmers reveals that, although Engels and Lenin differ in their classification of peasants, they are essentially classified according to the nature of management. There is an inherent consistency in the study of the objects in the text, that is, the large number of farmers such as small agricultural producers who are in the exploitative position in the nature of management. As small producers, they have deep-rooted private property in economy, are dominated by administrative power in political influence and have backward conservatism in thought. These attributes complement each other and promote each other. Moreover, the classical Marxist writers point out to varying degrees that the agricultural small producers will gradually decline and end or differentiate, and propose to reform the production and occupation of cooperatives or to develop collective ownership after gaining political power.
【作者單位】： 廣西師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國(guó)博士后科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“馬克思主義的農(nóng)民合作理論及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值”(2014M552289)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：A81

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 李志凱;勞動(dòng)力的私有性是社會(huì)主義社會(huì)商品經(jīng)濟(jì)存在的根本原因[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;1996年12期

2 陳潮;劉瑤;;新經(jīng)濟(jì)組織黨建工作的基本特點(diǎn)[J];現(xiàn)代企業(yè)教育;2008年18期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 高東嶺;技術(shù)佐證 MPLS-VPN，安全有據(jù)可循[N];網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界;2003年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 潘華琴;文學(xué)言語的私有性[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2124286