本文選題：馬克思 + 社會(huì)形態(tài)理論�。� 參考：《山西大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文由兩大部分內(nèi)容構(gòu)成,一是論述了馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論的產(chǎn)生背景、演變過(guò)程、成熟體系等；二是將這一理論與我國(guó)當(dāng)下客觀的現(xiàn)實(shí)相結(jié)合,闡述了馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論。 導(dǎo)言部分主要介紹了在我國(guó)新的歷史條件下對(duì)馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論進(jìn)行研究的必要性。在我國(guó)社會(huì)主義建設(shè)取得巨大成就,人民生活水平日益提高的同時(shí),社會(huì)領(lǐng)域的建設(shè)相對(duì)滯后,不能滿足人民對(duì)這一領(lǐng)域的期待和要求,加強(qiáng)在這一領(lǐng)域的建設(shè),完善這一領(lǐng)域的制度是擺在當(dāng)代學(xué)者面前的一個(gè)重大問(wèn)題。而馬克思的三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論為我們對(duì)于這一問(wèn)題的解決提供了努力的方向。 馬克思的三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論內(nèi)涵豐富,追根溯源才能真正把握馬克思這一理論的實(shí)質(zhì)內(nèi)涵。文章先從馬克思提出三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論的宏觀社會(huì)背景出發(fā),考察了馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論提出的現(xiàn)實(shí)條件和理論背景,用系統(tǒng)和辯證的方法,試圖還原馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論提出的時(shí)代全貌,力求對(duì)馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論做出一個(gè)更為客觀和全面的掌握；在對(duì)馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論的提出做時(shí)間上的橫向研究之后,對(duì)馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論的提出和成熟進(jìn)行了時(shí)間上的縱向研究。論文立足代表性文本對(duì)馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論的萌芽、發(fā)展和成熟的階段進(jìn)行了分析研究,突出了馬克思在論述社會(huì)形態(tài)理論的發(fā)展演變中,強(qiáng)調(diào)對(duì)物質(zhì)資料生產(chǎn)活動(dòng)的思想,體現(xiàn)了馬克思對(duì)人的處境和命運(yùn)的關(guān)懷。 把馬克思三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論與我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的實(shí)踐相結(jié)合,最大限度地化解社會(huì)矛盾,馬克思闡述三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論時(shí)所提出的“個(gè)人全面發(fā)展和他們共同的社會(huì)生產(chǎn)能力成為他們的社會(huì)財(cái)富這一基礎(chǔ)上的自由個(gè)性”�？朔鞣N障礙,實(shí)現(xiàn)又好又快發(fā)展的理論指導(dǎo),是實(shí)現(xiàn)以人為本的科學(xué)發(fā)展的良好精神財(cái)富。
[Abstract]:This paper is composed of two parts. One is to discuss the background, evolution and mature system of Marx's theory of three social forms, and the other is to combine this theory with the objective reality of our country. This paper expounds the three social formation theories of Marx. The introduction mainly introduces the necessity of studying Marx's three social formation theories under the new historical conditions of our country. While great achievements have been made in China's socialist construction and the people's living standards are improving day by day, the construction in the social field has lagged behind, which cannot meet the expectations and requirements of the people in this field and strengthen construction in this field. Perfecting the system in this field is an important problem for contemporary scholars. Marx's theory of three social forms provides a direction for us to solve this problem. The theory of Marx's three social forms is rich in connotation, only by tracing back to its source can we really grasp the essence of Marx's theory. Starting from the macroscopic social background of Marx's theory of the three social forms, this paper examines the realistic conditions and theoretical background of the theory of the three major social forms of Marx, and uses systematic and dialectical methods. This paper tries to restore the whole view of the times put forward by Marx's theory of three social forms, and tries to make a more objective and comprehensive grasp of the theory of the three great social forms of Marx. After making a horizontal study on the time of putting forward the theory of three major social forms of Marx, this paper makes a longitudinal study on the putting forward and maturing of the theory of the three major social forms of Marx in time. Based on the representative text, the paper analyzes and studies the germination, development and maturity of Marx's three social formation theories, and highlights Marx's development and evolution of social formation theory. The thought of material production reflects Marx's concern for man's situation and fate. Combining the three major social formation theories of Marx with the practice of constructing a harmonious socialist society at the present stage in our country, in order to resolve social contradictions to the maximum extent. When Marx expounded the theory of three social forms, he put forward "the individual's all-round development and their common social productive capacity become their social wealth on the basis of the free personality". Overcoming all kinds of obstacles and realizing the theory guidance of good and fast development is the good spiritual wealth to realize the scientific development of people-oriented.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：A811

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙家祥;;對(duì)質(zhì)疑“五種社會(huì)形態(tài)理論”的質(zhì)疑——與段忠橋教授商榷[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

2 季正矩;;正確認(rèn)識(shí)馬克思的社會(huì)形態(tài)理論[J];理論視野;2009年07期

3 段忠橋;對(duì)"五種社會(huì)形態(tài)理論"一個(gè)主要依據(jù)的質(zhì)疑——重釋《政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)批判〈序言〉》的一段著名論述[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

4 張明映;馬克思的社會(huì)發(fā)展三大形態(tài)理論及其意義[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);1997年01期

5 葉險(xiǎn)明;馬克思的“五形態(tài)論”與“三形態(tài)論”[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;1992年01期

6 段忠橋;馬克思的三大社會(huì)形態(tài)理論[J];史學(xué)理論研究;1995年04期

7 段忠橋;;馬克思從未提出過(guò)“五種社會(huì)形態(tài)理論”——答趙家祥教授[J];中國(guó)人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

8 李e，

本文編號(hào)：2100054