本文選題：歷史唯物主義 + 歷史觀��； 參考：《吉林大學》2015年博士論文

【摘要】：作為一次哲學史中的突破性革命，歷史唯物主義的構筑帶有標志性的里程碑意義。它的創(chuàng)立不僅給世人展示了馬克思哲學的形成軌跡和思想內(nèi)容，也在如何科學地處理人與人、人與自然和人與社會等一系列關系問題上對后人形成科學指導。 國內(nèi)外學術界對于歷史唯物主義進行研究并取得了豐富的學術成果，但對于歷史唯物主義的維度分析、內(nèi)涵意蘊探究等方面還尚有爭論。本文就歷史唯物主義的三重維度進行研究，結合馬克思哲學變革的歷史背景，馬克思撰寫的理論著作以及當代學者、專家們的理論成果，在此基礎之上深化對歷史唯物主義內(nèi)涵的思索，結合新認識，適時適度地表達對這一問題的新思考。本文從五個方面具體分析了馬克思哲學革命的思想發(fā)展歷程、歷史唯物主義的逐步創(chuàng)立與后期發(fā)展，并通過研究闡發(fā)出歷史唯物主義的三重維度，試圖把以往所不得見的觀點揭示出來。 本文分為五個部分： 第一部分：馬克思哲學革命的思想發(fā)展歷程 本部分以敘述馬克思哲學革命的思想發(fā)展作為主線，論述了馬克思對黑格爾“辯證法”的人本學改造、馬克思對費爾巴哈“人本學”的實踐論改造以及馬克思對青年黑格爾派“一般意識形態(tài)”的歷史唯物主義改造進程，從而掌握馬克思哲學變革的走向，做到在宏觀上探析馬克思哲學發(fā)展脈絡，在此基礎上得出馬克思哲學革命的最終成果與全部內(nèi)容，即歷史唯物主義。 第二部分：馬克思哲學就是歷史唯物主義 本部分以馬克思的新哲學觀與新世界觀為切入點，分析出歷史唯物主義之所以創(chuàng)立的基礎條件，同時梳理歷史唯物主義創(chuàng)立的過程，將“辯證唯物主義”、“實踐唯物主義”與“歷史唯物主義”三者之間的關系作出系統(tǒng)清晰的闡述。重點在分析上述三者的關系基礎上，指出為什么要把馬克思的哲學概括為“歷史唯物主義”而不是其他。 第三部分：歷史唯物主義的真實含義 本部分以學界長期對于歷史唯物主義的性質(zhì)問題的討論為切入點，分析歷史唯物主義所包含的三重內(nèi)涵。學界通行的觀點把歷史唯物主義理解為“歷史觀”和“歷史科學”。指出歷史唯物主義主要的來說是作為一種馬克思所特有的“新世界觀”而存在的。本章結合學界當前對于馬克思哲學總體性質(zhì)的理解，將歷史唯物主義的真實含義從固有的模式中抽離出來。得出歷史唯物主義是包含“歷史科學”、“歷史觀”和“世界觀”的“三位一體”的真實含義。 第四部分：歷史唯物主義三重維度的統(tǒng)一 本部分提出了筆者對于歷史唯物主義存在三重維度的觀點——歷史唯物主義不僅僅是“歷史觀”和“歷史科學”，更是一種“歷史解釋原則”而存在的“世界觀”。重點在于論述這三種內(nèi)涵并不是孤立地存在的。也就是說，歷史唯物主義不是上述三個部分的“總和”。歷史唯物主義不是“歷史科學”、“歷史觀”和“世界觀”三者的機械相加構成的“總和”，而是同一個歷史唯物主義所具有的三重內(nèi)涵�；诠P者對歷史唯物主義應有三重維度的提法，，對歷史唯物主義三重維度之間的內(nèi)在關聯(lián)進行分析，剖析三重維度得以統(tǒng)一的根源。 第五部分：歷史唯物主義三重維度的當代啟示 本部分旨在表明歷史唯物主義三重維度對當代的啟示，得出歷史唯物主義三重維度在“構建社會主義和諧社會”、“實現(xiàn)人的全面自由發(fā)展”以及“樹立社會主義核心價值體系”等具體社會實踐中的方法論指導，表明我國當代建設貫徹歷史唯物主義三重維度理論的實際指導的必要性。重點在于強調(diào)，如果不能從上述“三重內(nèi)涵”的角度，而只是注重“歷史科學”和“歷史觀”的角度去理解中國社會發(fā)展現(xiàn)實，就無法在歷史唯物主義的高度上理解當代中國特色社會主義實踐以及中國特色社會主義理論體系。
[Abstract]:As a breakthrough revolution in the history of philosophy, the construction of historical materialism has a landmark significance. Its creation not only shows the people of the world the formation of Marx's philosophy and the ideological content, but also how to scientifically deal with a series of relations between man and man, man and nature, human and society. Guidance.
The academic circles at home and abroad have studied historical materialism and have made rich academic achievements, but there are still arguments about the dimension analysis of historical materialism and the exploration of connotation connotation. This paper studies the three dimensions of historical materialism and combines the historical background of Marx's philosophical reform, and Marx writes the theory. On the basis of the theoretical achievements of the contemporary scholars and experts, on this basis, we deepen the thinking of the connotation of historical materialism, combine the new understanding, and express the new thinking on this issue in time and appropriately. This article analyzes the ideological development course of Marx's philosophical revolution in five aspects, the gradual creation of historical materialism and the later development of the historical materialism. And through the study of the three dimensions of historical materialism, we try to reveal the previously unseen views.
This article is divided into five parts:
Part one: the development of Marx's philosophical revolution.
This part, by narrating the ideological development of Marx's philosophical revolution as the main line, discusses Marx's humanistic transformation of Hagel's "Dialectics", Marx's remolding of Feuerbach's "humanism" and the historical materialism transformation of Marx on the "general ideology" of young Hagel school. The trend of Kyth's philosophical revolution is to make a macro analysis of the development of Marx's philosophy. On this basis, the final results and all contents of Marx's philosophical revolution, that is, historical materialism.
The second part: Marx's philosophy is historical materialism.
This part, taking Marx's new philosophy and the new world view as the starting point, analyzes the basic conditions for the creation of historical materialism and combs the process of the creation of historical materialism, and makes a systematic and clear exposition of the relationship between "dialectical materialism", "practical materialism" and "historical materialism" between the three. On the basis of analyzing the relationship between the above three points, points out why Marx's philosophy should be summed up as "historical materialism" rather than others.
The third part: the true meaning of historical materialism
This section, based on the long term discussion of the nature of historical materialism in the academic world, analyzes the three connotations of historical materialism. The prevailing viewpoint in the academic world understands historical materialism as "historical view" and "historical science". It is pointed out that historical materialism is a special kind of Marx. In combination with the understanding of the general nature of Marx's philosophy in the academic world, this chapter draws out the true meaning of historical materialism from the inherent mode. It is concluded that historical materialism is the true meaning of "the Trinity" of "historical science", "historical view" and "world outlook".
The fourth part: the unification of the three dimensions of historical materialism.
This part puts forward the author's view that there are three dimensions of historical materialism - historical materialism not only "historical view" and "historical science", but also a "world view" of "historical interpretation principle". The emphasis is on the discussion that these three kinds of connotations are not isolated in isolation. That is, historical materialism. It is not the "sum" of the three parts of the above. Historical materialism is not the "sum" of the mechanical addition of the three parties of the "historical view" and "world view", but the three connotation of the same historical materialism. Based on the author's formulation of the historical materialism, the three dimensions of the historical materialism, the historical materialism The internal relationship between the three dimensions of Marxism is analyzed, and the root cause of the unification of the three dimensions is analyzed.
The fifth part: the Contemporary Enlightenment of the three dimensions of historical materialism.
The purpose of this part is to show the Enlightenment of the three dimensions of historical materialism, and to draw a conclusion that the three dimensions of historical materialism are guided by the methodology of "building a socialist harmonious society", "realizing the all-round free development of human beings" and "setting up the core value system of socialism", indicating the contemporary construction of our country. The necessity of implementing the practical guidance of the three dimensional theory of historical materialism is to emphasize that it is impossible to understand the contemporary Chinese characteristics at the height of historical materialism if we can not understand the reality of Chinese social development from the angle of "three heavy Intension" and only pay attention to the perspective of "historical science" and "historical view". Socialist practice and theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：A811

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 趙德江;胡海波;;意識形態(tài)是人類歷史的一個方面——馬克思恩格斯在《德意志意識形態(tài)》中對意識形態(tài)的歷史考察[J];長白學刊;2008年02期

2 鐘明華;林釗;;馬克思對人的發(fā)現(xiàn)及其對青年黑格爾派的超越[J];黨政干部學刊;2012年05期

3 吳宏政;如何破解作為“世界觀”意義的歷史唯物主義[J];貴州師范大學學報(社會科學版);2002年05期

4 沈湘平;把握歷史科學觀念是正確理解馬克思哲學的關鍵[J];河北學刊;2005年05期

5 孫正聿;;對作為“范式”的哲學教科書的檢討與反思[J];河北學刊;2008年02期

6 戴勁;;論馬克思的“歷史科學”[J];華中科技大學學報(社會科學版);2011年06期

7 高清海 ,鄒化政;論辯證唯物主義與歷史唯物主義的關系——哲學與社會學的統(tǒng)一和分化[J];東北人民大學人文科學學報;1957年01期

8 高清海;哲學體系改革的嘗試[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;1986年01期

9 孫正聿;怎樣理解馬克思的哲學革命[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2005年03期

10 劉福森;;從本體論到生存論——馬克思實現(xiàn)哲學變革的實質(zhì)[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2007年03期

本文編號：2067603