本文關(guān)鍵詞：王充的邏輯思想探析，，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

王充的邏輯思想探析

王充的邏輯思想探析

秦漢以來,我國古代的邏輯思想的發(fā)展逐步進(jìn)入低谷,甚至停滯不前。而王充的邏輯思想?yún)s是這低谷中突起的高峰,在學(xué)術(shù)上具有承前啟后的重要地位。本文在力求占有并忠實于現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)資料的基礎(chǔ)上,對王充的邏輯思想進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的研究,其中重點在于對其認(rèn)識論、論證邏輯、歸謬式推理及邏輯思維規(guī)律的研究,本文共分四部分,即:文獻(xiàn)綜述、導(dǎo)論、正文、結(jié)束語。文獻(xiàn)綜述:本節(jié)力求對迄今為止有關(guān)王充的邏輯思想研究成果作一較全面的梳理,找出本文的立足點。就目前的研究成果來看,對王充邏輯思想的研究還主要停留在相關(guān)的思想史論著和邏輯史論著中,呈現(xiàn)出零散性、缺乏系統(tǒng)性和深入性的特點,本文的立足于點正是建立在這些缺陷的基礎(chǔ)之上,并克服、超越了這些缺陷。導(dǎo)論:主要闡述了本文的研究對象、研究目的、研究策略及其意 義。正文:正文部分共分四章,第一章,王充及其思想簡介,主要介紹王充的生平事跡及其思想。因為在中國歷史上,邏輯學(xué)并沒有從哲學(xué)和其他學(xué)科中分化出來,成為一門獨立的學(xué)科。嚴(yán)格說來,只有先秦《墨子·小取》篇,是專門研究邏輯的著作。即使是被公認(rèn)為墨家邏輯學(xué)的代表的《墨經(jīng)》,也包括幾何學(xué)、光學(xué)、力學(xué)以及政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、倫理等方面的研究成果。被公認(rèn)為中國古代邏輯學(xué)集大成的《荀子·正名》篇,也是與當(dāng)時的政治、倫理、語言研究相結(jié)合的產(chǎn)物,《公孫龍子》的邏輯思想,也同認(rèn)識論、策略論不足密切相關(guān)。所以說,如果中國邏輯史的研究對象和取材范圍只限于專門的邏輯學(xué)著作的話,則幾乎等于取消了這門學(xué)科的研究。同樣,王充的邏輯思想也不是獨立的,而是體現(xiàn)在對天人感應(yīng)、讖緯迷信的批判中,與其認(rèn)識論等思想摻合在一起,因此本章要介紹王充的思想,而不僅僅是其邏輯思想。第二章,王充的認(rèn)識論思想,本章主要介紹王充“實知”、“知實”的認(rèn)識論思想,包括認(rèn)識的來源、認(rèn)識的檢驗標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及認(rèn)識的特點等內(nèi)容。第三章,王充的邏輯思想,本章主要論述王充有關(guān)論證的邏輯思想;有關(guān)推理的邏輯思想;有關(guān)邏輯思維規(guī)律的邏輯思想。其中重點是其有關(guān)論證的邏輯思想,這也是王充對邏輯學(xué)所做出的貢獻(xiàn)。第四章,王充邏輯思想的影響,本文將站在同情地理解的基礎(chǔ)上對王充邏輯思想的影響進(jìn)行深入探討。結(jié)束語:主要探討有關(guān)中國邏輯思想的一些不足:1、中國存在邏輯何以可能;2、中國邏輯思想應(yīng)包含那些范圍;3、有關(guān)中國邏輯史研究的策略不足

【Abstract】 Qin and Han Dynasty, ancient China the development of the logic of thinking gradually into the low, or even stagnation. And Wang is the logical thinking process that the peak in the bottom, in the academic status has an important link between past and future. In this paper, sought to occupy and remain faithful to the existing literature on the basis of the logic of thinking of Wang systematic research, which focuses on its epistemological, logical argumentation, and reasoning to the absurd rules of logical thinking, this article is divided into four components, namely: A Literature Review, Introduction, body, conclusion.Literature Review: This section seeks to Wang on the date of the research results of the logic of thinking to make a more comprehensive sort out and find a foothold in this article. The results of research on the current view, the logical thinking of Wang was also the main stay of the study related to the history of ideas in the theory and logic of the history of discourse, showing a scattered and less systematic and less depth of features, this article is based built on the basis of these defects, and overcome, go beyond these shortcomings.Introduction: This article focused on the object of study, research purpose, research method and its significance.The body: the body part is divided into four chapters, Chapter I, Wang and their ideological profile, mainly the deeds of Wang’s life and ideas. Because in the Chinese history, logic and philosophy and not differentiated from other disciplines to become a separate academic subject. Strictly speaking, only the pre-Qin "Mozi·small check" articles, is devoted to study the works of logic. Even Mohist been recognized as the representative of logic "Mojing", including geometry, optics, mechanics, as well as political, economic, ethical and other aspects of the research results. Been recognized as master of logic in ancient China the "Xunzi·name" papers, but also with the political, ethical, linguistic product of the combination of research, "Gongsun Long Son," the logic of thinking, but also with the epistemology and methodology is closely related to the problem. So, if the logic of the history of China and based on the scope of the study is limited to specialized logic works, then it is almost equivalent to the abolition of the study subjects. Similarly, Wang is not the logic of thinking independently, but in the induction of Heaven, Chenwei critical of superstition, with its admixture with epistemology, such as thinking, so in this chapter to introduce the idea of Wang, not just the logic of thinking . Chapter II, thinking of Wang’s epistemology, this chapter introduces the Wang "actual knowledge", "really know" the epistemology of thought, including the source of awareness, understanding and knowledge of test characteristics of the content. Chapter III, Wang logical thinking, this chapter focuses on Wang logical thinking of the argument; the logic of the reasoning; the relevant laws of logical thinking logical thinking. Which focus on the logic of their thinking on the argument, which is on the logic Wang’s contributions. Chapter IV, the impact of Wang logical thinking, this article will be standing on the basis of sympathy to understand the logic of thinking of Wang Chong-depth study of the impact.Conclusion: The main logic of thinking to explore the Chinese some of the problems: 1, China may be the existence of the logic of why; 2, the logic of thinking in China that the scope should include; 3,Study methods on the history of Chinese logic.

【關(guān)鍵詞】 論衡； 論證； 推理； 思維規(guī)律； 邏輯思想；
【Key words】 LunHeng； Argumentation； reasoning； Rules of thinking； Logical thoughts；

更多論文推薦: 各專業(yè)論文 海量論文下載

上一篇文章： 法庭提問中預(yù)設(shè)的順應(yīng)—關(guān)聯(lián)理談淺析

下一篇文章： 先秦儒墨哲學(xué)中數(shù)的思想及其影響

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：王充的邏輯思想探析，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

本文編號：221653