本文選題：辯證邏輯 + contradiction��； 參考：《邏輯學研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：長期以來,中國邏輯學界圍繞"辯證邏輯"的主要爭議是這一邏輯是否可能存在。這種僅僅圍繞基本概念的討論因缺乏共識而難以為繼,在現(xiàn)代邏輯的研究范式?jīng)_擊下逐漸消亡。本文試圖為讀者展現(xiàn)一種近年來為學界逐漸接受的更加務實的方法。這種方法旨在考慮形式邏輯表達哲學上的"辯證"概念,并將其視為邏輯系統(tǒng)正當性的來源。這一進路促使國內(nèi)不同領(lǐng)域的學者們先后提出了多種相互競爭的辯證邏輯。進一步,盡管對辯證這一概念的理想翻譯可能是不存在的,但我們沒有理由將這樣一種尚在探索的邏輯排除在邏輯家族之外。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the main controversy around dialectical logic in Chinese logics circles is whether this logic can exist. Due to the lack of consensus, this kind of discussion, which only revolves around basic concepts, is gradually dying out under the impact of the research paradigm of modern logic. This paper attempts to show readers a more pragmatic approach that has gradually been accepted by scholars in recent years. The purpose of this method is to consider the concept of "dialectical" in the philosophy of formal logic expression and regard it as the source of logic system legitimacy. This route has prompted scholars in different fields to put forward a variety of competing dialectical logic. Furthermore, although the ideal translation of the concept of dialectics may not exist, there is no reason to exclude such a logic, which is still exploring, from the logical family.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學哲學系;內(nèi)蒙古師范大學法政學院;
【分類號】：B811
，

本文編號：2094093