本文選題：蒯因 + 整體論　； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 二十世紀著名的邏輯學(xué)家、哲學(xué)家蒯因(W.V.O.Quine)是一個經(jīng)驗論者,他深受卡爾納普(Rudolf Carnap)和邏輯經(jīng)驗主義(logical empiricism)的影響,但是他卻以著名的《經(jīng)驗論的兩個教條》(Two Dogmas of Empiricism)一文與卡爾納普分道揚鑣,這次分歧也成為蒯因整體論的萌芽。 蒯因整體論是隨著對分析綜合二分法和還原論的反對產(chǎn)生的,反對先驗知識、孤立主義是其整體論的主要內(nèi)容,文章通過分析蒯因批判分析綜合二分法、批判還原主義和其對邏輯和數(shù)學(xué)的態(tài)度來論證其整體論的確立,并通過理論的不充分確定性來支持其整體論思想,進而分析了整體論在其哲學(xué)體系中的地位和整體論本身的困難。 本文分為四個部分：第一部分,介紹了蒯因整體論產(chǎn)生的背景,屬于背景性知識介紹；第二部分,分析蒯因整體論產(chǎn)生的過程、內(nèi)容及其整體論由極端轉(zhuǎn)向溫和的轉(zhuǎn)變；第三部分將蒯因整體論放在他的哲學(xué)體系中,分析整體論和他的不確定性理論、自然主義、實用主義和徹底經(jīng)驗論之間的關(guān)系；第四部分分析了蒯因整體論引發(fā)的影響,并對其整體論中的一些問題作了反思和評價。 文章的新意體現(xiàn)在選題和寫作角度上,國內(nèi)眾多的探討蒯因哲學(xué)的論文中還未有專門探討他整體論的,所以選題上較新；國內(nèi)也鮮有學(xué)者從蒯因的整體論的內(nèi)容來探討蒯因的整體論哲學(xué)思想的,所以文章寫作的切入點上也較為新穎。本文對蒯因整體論進行了系統(tǒng)梳理,內(nèi)容翔實、忠于原著,旨在還原其整體論的原貌,為蒯因哲學(xué)研究盡一份綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:Quine Quine, a famous 20th century logician and philosopher, was an empiricist who was influenced by Rudolf Carnap Rudolf Carnapand logical empiricism. But he parted ways with Rudolf Carnap in the famous "two dogma of empiricism", which also became the seed of Quine's holism. Quine's holism came about as a result of opposition to analytical synthesis dichotomy and reductionism. Against transcendental knowledge, isolationism is the main content of his holism. By analyzing Quine's critical analysis of synthetic dichotomy, critical reductionism and his attitude to logic and mathematics, this paper demonstrates the establishment of his holism. And through the lack of certainty in theory to support his holism, and then analyze the position of holism in its philosophical system and the difficulties of holism itself. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part, This paper introduces the background of Quine's theory of holism, which belongs to the introduction of background knowledge, the second part, analyzes the process of Quine's theory of holism, its content and its transformation from extreme to moderate. The third part analyzes the relationship between Quine's holism and his theory of uncertainty, naturalism, pragmatism and thorough empiricism. Some problems in his holism are reviewed and evaluated. The new ideas of the article are reflected in the angle of topic selection and writing. Many domestic papers on Quine's philosophy have not specifically discussed his holism, so the topic is relatively new. There are few scholars in China to discuss Quine's philosophy of holism from the content of Quine's holism, so the starting point of writing is relatively new. This paper systematically combs Quine's theory of holism, which is full of contents and loyal to the original works, aiming at restoring the original appearance of Quine's theory of holism and contributing to the study of Quine's philosophy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：B81

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周北海;從卡爾納普的邏輯真概念到奎因的兩個教條批判[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1991年01期

2 周柏喬;王浩、蒯因與數(shù)學(xué)真理[J];北京社會科學(xué);1997年04期

3 胡新和;可檢驗性與整體論[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報);1996年01期

4 張慶熊;;“譯不準原理”和“世界觀的相對性”——奎因哲學(xué)思想述評[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1982年03期

5 戴志祥;分析哲學(xué)對經(jīng)驗論的批判[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1997年05期

6 張慶熊;蒯因駁斥的只是狹義分析性的概念嗎?——對蒯因批判分析與綜合兩分法的辨析[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年06期

7 李醒民;從理論整體論到意義整體論[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2003年05期

8 張文華;;論蒯因自然化的認識論及其對羅蒂的影響[J];國外理論動態(tài);2008年10期

9 王路;語言哲學(xué)研究述評(上)[J];國外社會科學(xué);1997年06期

10 王路;語言哲學(xué)研究述評(下)[J];國外社會科學(xué);1998年01期

，

本文編號：1999298