發(fā)布時間：2018-06-03 03:18

  本文選題：道德命題 + 態(tài)度　； 參考：《哲學分析》2017年05期

【摘要】：準實在論把道德命題看作態(tài)度的表達并發(fā)展出道德語言的邏輯形式和態(tài)度推理的有效性說明。就準實在論態(tài)度邏輯總體來說,其真理緊縮論混淆了真理和真值,但有益于糾正真值實在論、理解推理有效性;其推理有效性說明已經(jīng)觸及一致性的邏輯有效性本質,因此對其混淆態(tài)度矛盾與邏輯矛盾的批評并未切中其要害。準實在論語用學片面理解道德判斷的功能,混淆道德命題、態(tài)度描述命題和態(tài)度表達語句;通過把道德范疇看作滲透價值、把道德命題看作以此為基礎的描述,道德命題語義學屬性的確是反實在論的,但仍可以按緊縮論解釋的邏輯真說明其推理有效性。
[Abstract]:Quasi-realism regards moral proposition as the expression of attitude and develops the logical form of moral language and the validity of attitude reasoning. In terms of quasi-realism attitude logic in general, its truth contraction theory confuses truth and truth value, but it is beneficial to correct truth-valued realism and to understand the validity of reasoning. Therefore, the criticism of its confused attitude contradiction and logic contradiction does not hit its key point. Quasi realism pragmatics one-sidedly understands the function of moral judgment, confuses moral proposition, attitude description proposition and attitude expression statement, and regards moral category as infiltrating value and moral proposition as a description based on it. The semantic attribute of moral propositions is indeed anti-realism, but it can be explained by the logic of contraction theory.
【作者單位】： 廣東海洋大學馬克思主義學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金2015年第三批后期資助項目“準實在論研究”(項目編號:15FZX031)階段性成果 廣東省哲學社會科學“十二五”規(guī)劃2012年度學科共建項目“價值觀的理性:準實在論的啟示”(項目編號:GD12XZX01)成果 廣東海洋大學2012年度人文社科校級項目“準實在論研究:公共決策的一種哲學基礎”成果
【分類號】：B81-0
，

本文編號：1971263