本文選題：類比推理辯護(hù) + 常識模型　； 參考：《云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)60年代瑪麗·赫西對類比推理辯護(hù)問題進(jìn)行的探討逐漸形成常識模型。但這一模型和規(guī)則存在難以解決的困難。哲學(xué)家巴薩反思常識模型,從而提出自己的模型,為類比進(jìn)行辯護(hù)。但巴薩僅僅將類比論證的問題限定在邏輯的構(gòu)建之上加以辯護(hù)是不恰當(dāng)?shù)�。這樣辯護(hù)的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)既不充分也不牢靠。類比推理是邏輯與心理交叉研究的模糊地帶,需要將其放在更加深刻的邏輯哲學(xué)問題背景中,才能看到這一問題的實質(zhì)。我們不僅需要從邏輯的角度,從技術(shù)上做出一個合理的辯護(hù),也需要從哲學(xué)上對其背后所隱藏的哲學(xué)問題做出系統(tǒng)解答。一種更為合理的辯護(hù)策略是:關(guān)于類比論證的辯護(hù)需要從兩方面進(jìn)行,首先要建立合理的類比論證模型,并為這一模型進(jìn)行哲學(xué)辯護(hù)。然后為其背后的邏輯與心理關(guān)系問題做出合理的哲學(xué)解答,從而支撐所建立的模型。
[Abstract]:In the 1960 s, Mary Hersey's discussion on analogical reasoning defense gradually formed a common sense model.However, this model and rules are difficult to solve.The philosopher Bassa reflected on the common sense model and put forward his own model to defend the analogy.But it is inappropriate for Barca to limit the analogical argument to the construction of logic.The philosophical basis for such a defence is neither adequate nor firm.Analogical reasoning is a fuzzy zone in which logic and psychology are intersected. It needs to be placed in a more profound background of logic philosophy in order to see the essence of this problem.We not only need to make a reasonable defense from the angle of logic and technology, but also need to make a systematic solution to the hidden philosophical problems from the philosophical point of view.A more reasonable defense strategy is that the defense of analogical argumentation should be carried out from two aspects. Firstly, a reasonable model of analogical argumentation should be established and the model should be defended by philosophy.Then the logical and psychological relationship behind the reasonable philosophical solution, so as to support the established model.
【作者單位】： 南開大學(xué)哲學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“現(xiàn)代歸納邏輯的新發(fā)展、理論前沿與應(yīng)用研究”(2015ZDB018)
【分類號】：B81-05
，

本文編號：1770503