本文關(guān)鍵詞： 歸納推理 利普頓 最佳說(shuō)明的推理　出處：《自然辯證法研究》2017年07期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：最佳說(shuō)明的推理旨在解決歸納推理的描述性問(wèn)題和確證性問(wèn)題,可概括為歸納推理的說(shuō)明論辯護(hù)。說(shuō)明論基于"說(shuō)明優(yōu)先于推理"和"認(rèn)識(shí)上的雙重過(guò)濾"兩個(gè)前提,在解決描述性問(wèn)題和確證性問(wèn)題方面兼具啟發(fā)性。然而,批評(píng)者從前提、語(yǔ)義和語(yǔ)用等方面對(duì)說(shuō)明論辯護(hù)提出了挑戰(zhàn)。面對(duì)指責(zé),需要明確"說(shuō)明優(yōu)先于推理"的含義,表明對(duì)說(shuō)明論的評(píng)價(jià)不應(yīng)限于語(yǔ)義約定,說(shuō)明論的確證功能不應(yīng)僅限于事實(shí)層面,以及反例不會(huì)使說(shuō)明論的辯護(hù)毫無(wú)價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:The purpose of best description reasoning is to solve the descriptive and confirmatory problems of inductive reasoning. The explanation theory can be summed up as inductive reasoning, which is based on the premise of "explanation takes precedence over reasoning" and "dual filtering of cognition", which is both enlightening in solving descriptive and corroborative problems. Critics challenge the defense of declarative theory from the aspects of premise, semantics and pragmatics. In the face of criticism, it is necessary to clarify the meaning of "explanation takes precedence over reasoning", which indicates that the evaluation of declarative theory should not be limited to semantic agreement. The corroboration function of declarative theory should not be limited to factual level and counterexample does not render the justification of illustrative theory worthless.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：四川大學(xué)中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)項(xiàng)目“犯罪主觀要素認(rèn)定原理研究”(skzx2016-sb19)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B812.23
【正文快照】： 一、歸納推理的說(shuō)明論辯護(hù)理路我們對(duì)歸納推理的懷疑源于它的那個(gè)隱含前提:“未來(lái)會(huì)繼續(xù)與過(guò)去一致”。其一,“未來(lái)會(huì)繼續(xù)與過(guò)去一致”不能得到演繹上的證成。證成“未來(lái)會(huì)繼續(xù)與過(guò)去一致”這個(gè)前提必須借助“自然齊一性”,而“自然齊一性”存在兩個(gè)邏輯跳躍:“一是從實(shí)際觀察，

本文編號(hào)：1481647