【摘要】：正長期以來,明代宗藩被視為終身坐享食祿的"寄生集團",又因其上亂中央,下擾地方,成為國家"弊癥",多受詬病。迄今,學界對明代宗藩的研究,既有關(guān)于宗藩制度、宗藩人口、土地占有、歷史演變的宏觀研究,也有關(guān)于宗藩犯罪、地域宗藩、婚姻制度、宗教信仰的微觀透視,評價也漸趨理性。但對明代藩王個體系統(tǒng)的專門研究略顯不足,英國歷史學家、牛津大學教授柯律格(Craig Clunas)《藩屏——明代中國的皇家藝術(shù)與權(quán)力》(河南大學出版社,2016年)立足藝術(shù)文化,著眼權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)
[Abstract]:For a long time, Suzerain in Ming Dynasty was regarded as a "parasitic group" for sitting and eating for life, and it was criticized for disorderly central government and disturbing the place. Up to now, the academic research on Suzerain-vassal system in Ming Dynasty includes not only the macro-research on Suzerain-vassal system, Suzerain-vassal population, land occupation and historical evolution, but also the microcosmic perspective on Suzerain-vassal crime, regional Suzerain-vassal system, marriage system and religious belief. Evaluation is also becoming more rational. However, there is a slight shortage of special research on the individual system of kings in Ming Dynasty. (Craig Clunas), a British historian and professor at Oxford University, is based on art and culture in the Royal Art and Power of China in Ming Dynasty (Henan University Press, 2016). Focus on the transfer of powe
【作者單位】： 河南大學歷史文化學院;
【分類號】：K871.45-5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 韓晗;景泰無通寶 一志永流傳[N];中國民族報;2014年

，

本文編號：2473870