發(fā)布時間：2018-09-18 14:10

【摘要】：楚竹書《曹沫之陣》有"大官之師"一詞,與將軍、嬖大夫、公孫公子比次論列。論者多據(jù)《禮記·祭法》、韋昭《國語解》立說,以為大官之師即依禮得立一廟、身份階層為士的"官師",由此形成對竹簡文義及曹沫軍事思想的錯誤判斷。實際上,大官之師一詞與古籍舊典中用來泛稱一官之長、通常等同于大夫的"官師"義出一轍。而官師問題,本涉及學(xué)術(shù)史上的諸多公案,或因義解,或因文本,或因字詁,有必要就其原委得失做一系統(tǒng)梳理。在此基礎(chǔ)上,進一步闡明官、大官與大夫階層之關(guān)系以及官、爵、祿三者在考察標(biāo)準(zhǔn)上的是非異同,將有助于對相關(guān)簡文及其隱含的軍事思想形成更為透徹的理解。
[Abstract]:Chu Zhushu's "battle of Cao Mo" has the word "the teacher of a great official" and compares it with general, doctor-in-law and grandson. The term "teacher" is often used to refer to a general officer in ancient books, and is usually the same as the doctor's "official teacher". The question of "official teacher" originally involves many public cases in academic history, either because of meaning, or because of text, or because of character, it is necessary to sort out its original merits and demerits systematically. The similarities and differences in the criteria of investigation among the departments, the officials, the nobles and the officials will help to form a more thorough understanding of the relevant bamboo slips and their implied military thoughts.
【作者單位】： 湖南大學(xué)岳麓書院;
【分類號】：K877.5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;前言[J];簡牘學(xué)研究;1998年00期

2 ;前言[J];簡牘學(xué)研究;1997年00期

3 ;前言[J];簡牘學(xué)研究;2002年00期

4 ;前言[J];簡牘學(xué)研究;2004年00期

5 廖名春;楚簡《老子》“挍襲為上”考[J];煙臺師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

6 彭裕商;讀楚簡隨記[J];考古與文物;2003年06期

7 yそ〈，

本文編號：2248162