發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-17 22:36

  本文選題：溝灣遺址 + 仰韶文化��； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 溝灣遺址,原名下集遺址,以新石器時(shí)代堆積為主,包括仰韶文化、屈家?guī)X文化、石家河文化、王灣三期文化四個(gè)時(shí)期,其中又以仰韶文化堆積最為豐富。最近的考古發(fā)掘表明在仰韶文化時(shí)期這一地區(qū)已經(jīng)形成了環(huán)壕聚落,同時(shí)其豐富的文化內(nèi)涵為我們研究豫西南地區(qū)在這個(gè)階段的考古學(xué)文化及周鄰文化關(guān)系提供了大量的材料。 溝灣遺址地處黃河與長(zhǎng)江中游文化區(qū)聯(lián)結(jié)地帶的漢水中游地區(qū),該遺址的研究工作,不僅對(duì)研究漢水中游地區(qū)新石器時(shí)代文化的發(fā)展序列以及不同文化的分期與年代,揭示不同時(shí)期的聚落布局及其演變規(guī)律,探索當(dāng)時(shí)人們與自然環(huán)境的關(guān)系,而且對(duì)探討黃河與長(zhǎng)江中游兩地區(qū)的文化交流狀況等問題,都具有十分重要的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。 本文利用最新發(fā)掘材料,通過地層學(xué)、類型學(xué)、文化因素分析法及聚落考古學(xué)的方法對(duì)溝灣遺址進(jìn)行個(gè)案研究。在對(duì)這些材料整理的基礎(chǔ)上,依據(jù)打破關(guān)系分組,進(jìn)而對(duì)各組器物進(jìn)行排隊(duì)比較,進(jìn)而分段、分期；在分期的基礎(chǔ)上分析各期遺存的文化特征,同時(shí)結(jié)合本地區(qū)已發(fā)掘其他遺址的材料,探討其與周鄰遺存關(guān)系；進(jìn)而分析各個(gè)時(shí)期聚落形態(tài)特征,研究其布局及各期的變化。以期客觀、全面的反映仰韶文化在這一地區(qū)的大致發(fā)展面貌。 研究表明豫西南地區(qū)的仰韶文化大體可分分為四個(gè)時(shí)期,基本上解決了仰韶文化的源流問題。在不同的階段以溝灣遺址為代表的地方類型接受外來文化因素的程度也有所不同,早期與關(guān)中地區(qū)有所交流,中期受豫中地區(qū)影響較大,但總體上仍然保持了發(fā)展的自主性和獨(dú)立性。在仰韶文化內(nèi)部諸類型相互影響、交融的過程中逐漸向西、向南發(fā)展,進(jìn)而影響漢水上、中游地區(qū),在聚落形態(tài)上也表現(xiàn)出了逐步發(fā)展的勢(shì)頭,但最終被屈家?guī)X文化快速取代。
[Abstract]:Gouwan site, originally named Xiagi site, mainly consisted of Neolithic accumulation, including Yangshao culture, Qujialing culture, Shijiahe culture and Wangwan third period culture, among which Yangshao culture was the most abundant.Recent archaeological excavations show that this area has formed a trench settlement during the Yangshao culture period, and its rich cultural connotations provide a lot of materials for us to study the archaeological culture and the relationship between the neighboring cultures in this stage of southwest Henan.The Gouwan site is located in the Hanshui region of the cultural area of the Yellow River and the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. The research work of the site not only studies the sequence of development of Neolithic culture in the area of the Han River, but also the stages and ages of different cultures.It is of great academic value to reveal the settlement layout and its evolution law in different periods, to explore the relationship between people and the natural environment at that time, and to probe into the cultural exchange between the Yellow River and the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.Based on the latest excavated materials, this paper makes a case study of Gouwan site by means of stratigraphy, typology, cultural factor analysis and settlement archaeology.On the basis of sorting out these materials, according to the broken relationship grouping, then the objects of each group were queued and compared, and then divided into sections and stages; on the basis of stages, the cultural characteristics of the remains of each period were analyzed.At the same time, based on the materials of other sites excavated in this area, the relationship between them and the neighboring remains is discussed, and then the characteristics of settlement morphology in different periods are analyzed, and the distribution and changes of each period are studied.In order to objectively and comprehensively reflect the development of Yangshao culture in this area.The research shows that the Yangshao culture in southwest Henan can be divided into four periods, which basically solves the problem of the origin of Yangshao culture.In different stages, the local types represented by Gouwan site have different degrees of accepting foreign cultural factors. In the early period, there was exchange with the Guanzhong area, and in the middle period it was greatly influenced by the central Henan area.Overall, however, the autonomy and independence of development are maintained.The various types of Yangshao culture interacted with each other and gradually developed westward and southward in the process of blending, and then affected the upper and middle reaches of the Han River, which also showed the tendency of gradual development in the form of settlement, but it was replaced rapidly by Qujialing culture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K878

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王富國;漢水中游地區(qū)石家河文化研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

2 張智尚;淅川溝灣遺址制陶工藝觀察[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1765634