本文選題：四壩文化　切入點(diǎn)：林雅文化　出處：《新疆師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：公元前4000年前后開始的青銅時(shí)代，源自歐亞西方以青銅技術(shù)為主導(dǎo)的文明因素和源于東方黃河流域以彩陶文化為主導(dǎo)東方文化因素，相向傳播過程中，在新疆的東部天山和河西西部相遇，從而拉開了這一區(qū)域文化交融與互動(dòng)的過程�？脊虐l(fā)現(xiàn)給我們留下證明這一過程存在遺存很多。其中以分布于哈密盆地的林雅文化和位于河西西端的四壩文化表現(xiàn)的最為突出。對(duì)林雅文化與四壩文化進(jìn)行比較研究，可以梳理出青銅時(shí)代東西文化交流的一些重要的細(xì)節(jié)。 四壩文化和林雅文化目前發(fā)現(xiàn)的基本為墓葬材料，本文立足前人的研究成果，對(duì)四壩文化墓地和林雅文化墓地的諸要素進(jìn)行解析，以透視四壩文化和林雅文化墓葬制度及其結(jié)構(gòu)。在此基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)四壩文化墓葬制度和隨葬品類型進(jìn)行比較分析，以互動(dòng)理論為支撐，站在文化交融的視野，討論史前時(shí)期文化的交融、沖突與融合問題。為史前東西交流的研究提供個(gè)案例證。文化遺產(chǎn)研究和文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)，是相互依存、互有重點(diǎn)的兩個(gè)方面。文化內(nèi)涵挖掘?yàn)槲幕z產(chǎn)保護(hù)的基礎(chǔ)，文化保護(hù)是為進(jìn)一步發(fā)掘文化遺產(chǎn)普遍和突出文化價(jià)值。所以在論文的后半部分，還對(duì)文化遺產(chǎn)的具體保護(hù)措施進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的探討。 四壩文化和林雅文化的比較基本分為兩個(gè)部分。第一部分是對(duì)四壩文化和林雅文化墓葬制度進(jìn)行了比較分析，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)它們之間的區(qū)別是主要，墓葬制度是在不同文化系統(tǒng)中獨(dú)立發(fā)展起來(lái)，，它們之間的聯(lián)系是次要，只在局部因素上可以看出些互相的影響，這表明在雙方人群接觸過程中，在墓葬制度方面未發(fā)生深刻和進(jìn)一步交融；第二部分是對(duì)四壩文化與林雅文化隨葬品以及其它出土文物的比較研究，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)兩者在陶器、銅器以及其它器物層面相似性大于差異性。無(wú)論從器物的制作方式、類型特征、裝飾風(fēng)格、功能用途、發(fā)展演化等方面，其關(guān)系都呈現(xiàn)出內(nèi)在、互融、共存特點(diǎn)。特別是以彩陶為代表文化和以銅器為代表的文化系統(tǒng)，有著不同的文化淵源。這兩個(gè)文化系統(tǒng)的諸文化因素向相傳播，對(duì)早期歐亞大陸東西方文化的形成和文明出現(xiàn)以及特質(zhì)構(gòu)成都產(chǎn)生了極為深遠(yuǎn)的影響。這也是將林雅文化與四壩文化進(jìn)行比較研究的重要意義所在。
[Abstract]:The Bronze Age, which began around 4000 BC, originated from the civilization factors dominated by bronze technology in western Europe and Asia, and from the oriental Yellow River basin, in which the colored pottery culture was the dominant factor in the oriental culture.The meeting between Tianshan and western Hexi in the east of Xinjiang has opened the process of regional culture blending and interaction.Archaeological discoveries have left us with a lot of evidence of this process.Linya culture in Hami basin and Siba culture in the western end of Hexi are the most prominent.A comparative study of Linya culture and Siba culture can sort out some important details of the cultural exchange between East and West in the Bronze Age.The basic materials found in Siba culture and Linya culture at present are tombs. Based on the previous research results, this paper analyzes the elements of Siba cultural cemetery and Linya cultural cemeteries.In this paper, the tomb system and structure of Siba culture and Linya culture are analyzed.On this basis, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the system of cultural burial and the types of burial objects in Siba culture, taking the interactive theory as the support, standing in the perspective of cultural blending, and discussing the blending, conflict and fusion of culture in prehistoric period.To provide a case for the study of prehistoric communication.The study of cultural heritage and the protection of cultural heritage are two important aspects.Cultural connotation excavation is the foundation of cultural heritage protection, and cultural protection is to further explore cultural heritage universal and highlight cultural value.Therefore, in the second half of the paper, the specific measures to protect cultural heritage are briefly discussed.The comparison between Siba culture and Linya culture is basically divided into two parts.The first part is a comparative analysis of the tomb system of Siba culture and Linya culture. The results show that the difference between them is the main one, the burial system develops independently in different cultural systems, and the relationship between them is secondary.Only in the local factors can we see some mutual influence, which indicates that in the process of the contact between the two groups, there is no deep and further blending in the burial system;The second part is a comparative study of the burial objects and other unearthed cultural relics of Siba culture and Linya culture. The results show that the similarity between the two in pottery, bronze and other artifacts is greater than the difference.No matter from the aspects of making way, type characteristic, decoration style, function use, development and evolution of the objects, the relationship between them presents the characteristics of inherent, mutual fusion and coexistence.Especially, the culture system represented by painted pottery and bronze ware has different cultural origins.The cultural factors of these two cultural systems spread to each other, which had a profound influence on the formation of the early Eurasian Eastern and Western cultures, the emergence of civilization and the formation of special features.This is also the significance of the comparative study of Linya culture and Siba culture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：K872

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓建業(yè);;中國(guó)西北地區(qū)先秦時(shí)期的人地關(guān)系特征[J];北京聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

2 方群;甘肅地區(qū)齊家文化及青銅時(shí)代諸文化的發(fā)現(xiàn)與研究[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);1990年06期

3 潛偉;新疆哈密及其鄰近地區(qū)史前時(shí)期銅器的檢驗(yàn)與分析[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2004年02期

4 容觀■;文化傳播與傳播論派──文化人類學(xué)方法論研究之三[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年04期

5 ;關(guān)于文化和文化變遷的研究——人類學(xué)方法論研究之四[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年01期

6 ;火燒溝文化[J];黨的建設(shè);2008年03期

7 安志敏;;甘肅遠(yuǎn)古文化及其有關(guān)的幾個(gè)UO楲[J];考古通訊;1956年06期

8 陳戈;;關(guān)于新疆地區(qū)的青銅時(shí)代和早期鐵器時(shí)代文化[J];考古;1990年04期

9 安志敏;;塔里木盆地及其周圍的青銅文化遺存[J];考古;1996年12期

10 安志敏;;甘肅山丹四X樘殘率魘貝胖穂J];考古學(xué)報(bào);1959年03期

本文編號(hào)：1730738