本文選題：瞿中溶　切入點：金石學　出處：《湖南師范大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：瞿中溶是清代嘉慶、道光年間江蘇著名學者。為錢大昕女婿,宏通淹雅,金石之學尤深。曾任修嘉慶《湖南通志》,獨纂金石一門,最為賅備,所擅長也。生平著述極多,尤以金石類研究為主。然迄今為止,尚無人對其金石學進行全面的研究。本文欲聯(lián)系其學術(shù)環(huán)境,通過深入系統(tǒng)地研究瞿中溶的生平經(jīng)歷和金石著述,完成此項工作。 本人分三章,第一章為“瞿中溶與金石學”,通過描述瞿中溶所處時代的金石學狀況,及瞿氏早年金石學研究經(jīng)歷,深入分析了自宋代金石學肇始以來,前代學術(shù)遺產(chǎn)以及其當代金石學學術(shù)環(huán)境對其金石學研究的影響。第二章為“瞿中溶金石學著述考論”,對瞿中溶現(xiàn)存的金石學著述逐一進行客觀介紹與分析,探析其不同類別金石學著述中所體現(xiàn)的學術(shù)意識及研究方法。第三章為“瞿中溶金石學評述”,首先從以金石為考古之資的學術(shù)意識、實事求是的學術(shù)態(tài)度和多聞闕疑的學術(shù)精神三個方面概括了瞿中溶的金石學思想及其特色。然后,總結(jié)了瞿中溶金石研究的方法,即遠紹旁搜、親力親為；廣征博引、列舉類比；補缺證偽、詳于考據(jù)。最后,指出了瞿中溶金石研究中的存在的失之夸博和信史太過兩個缺陷。從這三個角度對瞿中溶的金石學作出評價。
[Abstract]:Qu Zhongyun, a famous scholar in Jiangsu Province during the period of Daoguang, was a famous scholar in the Qing Dynasty. He was Qian Daxin's son-in-law, Hongtong Yanya, and especially deep in the study of gold and stone. He had been appointed to revise Jiaqing's Hunan Tongzhi, compiling only one stone, the most comprehensive, the best at it, and he was also good at it. He wrote a lot about his life. However, so far, no one has made a comprehensive study of his petrology. This paper intends to contact his academic environment and complete this work through a thorough and systematic study of qu Zhongyong's life experience and his writings on gold and stone. I am divided into three chapters, the first chapter is "qu Zhongyong and the study of gold and stone". By describing the situation of the period of the period in which qu Zhongyong lived, and qu's early experience in the study of petrology, I have deeply analyzed the history of the study of the stone and gold since the beginning of the Song Dynasty. The influence of the academic heritage of the previous generation and the academic environment of its contemporary petrology on the study of its petrology. The second chapter is "an examination of qu Zhongyao's writings on the study of petrology", which makes an objective introduction and analysis one by one of qu Zhongyao's extant writings on the study of petrology. This paper analyzes the academic consciousness and research methods embodied in his various works on petrology. The third chapter is the commentary of qu Zhong's goldstone science. Firstly, the author starts with the academic consciousness of taking gold and stone as archaeological material. Three aspects of seeking truth from facts and lack of academic spirit generalize qu Zhongyong's thought and characteristics of goldstone. Enumerating analogies; making up for false evidence is more detailed than textual research. Finally, the author points out that there are two defects in qu Zhongyong's study of gold and stone, and points out that there are two defects in the study of gold and stone in qu Zhongyong's study. From these three angles, the author makes an evaluation of qu Zhongyao's petrology.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K877

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王雪玲;;論清代金石學的學術(shù)自覺與理論價值[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2013年02期

，

本文編號：1607313