本文關(guān)鍵詞：秦阿房宮研究　出處：《西北大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 阿房宮 阿房宮前殿 若干問題 研究

【摘要】：秦阿房宮是中國古代最著名的宮殿之一。戰(zhàn)國時(shí)期秦惠文王開始修建,史書記載并未建成。秦朝建立以后秦始皇又在惠文王的基礎(chǔ)上繼續(xù)修建阿房宮,準(zhǔn)備作為自己處理政事的朝宮,可惜一直到秦朝滅亡阿房宮仍舊沒有竣工。阿房宮雖然是個(gè)“半拉子”工程,但是它在中國歷史上的地位卻十分重要。長期以來,人們都把它當(dāng)做秦朝勞民傷財(cái)?shù)淖C據(jù)。此外,由于阿房宮宏大的規(guī)模和巧妙的布局結(jié)構(gòu)在史書中多處都有記載,所以它對(duì)我們今天研究中國古代建筑史的發(fā)展也有重要意義。阿房宮遺址早在建國初期就被國家作為全國重點(diǎn)文物保護(hù)單位予以保護(hù),至今在遺址范圍內(nèi)到處可見夯土遺跡。 由于阿房宮在中國古代歷史上地位重要,所以關(guān)于秦阿房宮的命名、含義及讀音等問題一直都是史學(xué)界研究的熱點(diǎn)。同時(shí),對(duì)于阿房宮的始建時(shí)間,最終建成與否等問題也始終存在爭議。2002年10月至2007年12月,阿房宮考古工作隊(duì)對(duì)阿房宮遺址進(jìn)行了科學(xué)的考古勘探和發(fā)掘,得到大量的一手資料,對(duì)阿房宮的規(guī)模以及傳統(tǒng)上認(rèn)為的項(xiàng)羽火燒阿房宮等問題都給出了新的結(jié)論,在史學(xué)界乃至整個(gè)社會(huì)上引起了很大的轟動(dòng),但是也有一部分學(xué)者對(duì)這些新說法提出了異議。本文分析了前人對(duì)于阿房宮諸問題的觀點(diǎn),結(jié)合考古資料,我認(rèn)為阿房宮得名于宮殿所在地的名字,讀作‘'e pang gong",阿房宮建筑群包括其周圍的附屬建筑,前殿也有秦朝建筑物存在過,秦末阿房宮毀于項(xiàng)羽之手,漢朝修葺投入使用,一直到北宋時(shí)荒廢。
[Abstract]:Qin afanggong is the most famous palace of ancient Chinese. During the period of the Warring States Qin Hui Wang building, historical records were not built. After the establishment of the Qin Dynasty and Qin Shihuang in Wen Hui on the basis of building on Epang palace, ready to handle affairs as their own towards the house, but until the Qin Dynasty perish afanggong is still not completed. Although the afanggong is a "half" project, but it is very important position in the history of the China. For a long time, people take it as the evidence to harass the people and waste money. In addition, the layout structure of Epang palace grand scale and ingenious in history has many records, so it has important significance for the development of our research the history of ancient architecture today. China afanggong sites by the state as a national key cultural relics protection units to be protected in the early days, so far in the ruins everywhere within the scope of soil compaction Ruins.
Because of the position in the history of ancient Chinese afanggong Qin afanggong so important about the name, meaning and pronunciation has always been a hot issue in the field of historical study. At the same time, for the Epang palace was built, finally built or not also have always been controversial.2002 from October to December 2007, the afanggong archaeological team the scientific archaeological exploration and excavation to afanggong sites, get a lot of information on the one hand, the scale and traditionally he burned afanggong afanggong and so on are given a new conclusion, caused a great sensation in the history of academia and society as a whole, but there are also some scholars the objection to these new claims. This paper analyzes the previous view problems as the Epang palace, with archaeological data, I think afanggong gets its name from the palace where the name "'e Pang Gong" read, afanggong The affiliated building buildings including the surrounding buildings, there existed the front end of the Qin Dynasty, Epang palace was destroyed by the end of hand, the Han Dynasty to the Northern Song Dynasty has been repaired and put into use, when abandoned.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：K878.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張榮慶;;阿房宮[J];古建園林技術(shù);1984年01期

2 朱捷元;黑光;;陜西長安縣小蘇村出土的銅建筑構(gòu)件[J];考古;1975年02期

3 ;西安市上林苑遺址一號(hào)、二號(hào)建筑發(fā)掘簡報(bào)[J];考古;2006年02期

4 ;西安市上林苑遺址三號(hào)建筑及五號(hào)建筑排水管道遺跡的發(fā)掘[J];考古;2007年03期

5 ;西安市上林苑遺址六號(hào)建筑的勘探和試掘[J];考古;2007年11期

6 楊東宇;段清波;;阿房宮概念與阿房宮考古[J];考古與文物;2006年02期

7 張亞杰;淺釋阿房宮[J];中國地名;2000年05期

8 雍芳泉;阿房宮名考[J];華夏文化;1998年03期

9 陳景元;;阿房宮的“另類觀點(diǎn)”[J];科學(xué)大觀園;2008年08期

10 項(xiàng)福庫;;阿房宮及其規(guī)�？糩J];絲綢之路;2009年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1391213