本文關(guān)鍵詞： 中歐 美國因素 地緣戰(zhàn)略 地緣政治 地緣經(jīng)濟(jì) 地緣文化　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2005年是中歐建交30周年,當(dāng)前中歐關(guān)系處于歷史上最活躍、最富有成果的時(shí)期,前景廣闊。這兩個(gè)處于歐亞大陸兩端、崛起中的政治實(shí)體,正在構(gòu)建一種穩(wěn)定的、長期的戰(zhàn)略合作。它將對重組中的世界秩序產(chǎn)生重要影響,有助于建構(gòu)一個(gè)更為平衡、多元的國際新秩序。美國既是中歐戰(zhàn)略接近的促進(jìn)因素,又是制約因素,是影響中歐關(guān)系的主要外部力量。 論文從地緣戰(zhàn)略角度來觀察中美歐三角關(guān)系互動(dòng)。以地緣戰(zhàn)略相關(guān)概念的闡釋為切入點(diǎn),論述了地緣戰(zhàn)略的研究內(nèi)容和特點(diǎn)。地緣戰(zhàn)略是由地緣政治發(fā)展而來的一種戰(zhàn)略理論,但是隨著世界地緣格局的變化,地緣戰(zhàn)略理論研究的理論、方法和分析視角日趨多樣與綜合,在注重地緣政治分析的同時(shí),開始關(guān)注地緣經(jīng)濟(jì)、地緣文化等分析。 中、歐是歐亞大陸權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)的兩根支柱,美國是遠(yuǎn)離歐亞大陸的海洋國家。歐亞大陸始終是美國地緣戰(zhàn)略的重點(diǎn)。冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期,為了對付來自歐亞大陸腹地的威脅,美國嚴(yán)格控制了中歐地緣戰(zhàn)略關(guān)系的發(fā)展,使之成為被動(dòng)的“派生性關(guān)系”:而由于同樣的原因,中歐均把發(fā)展對美地緣戰(zhàn)略關(guān)系放在首位,中美關(guān)系、美歐關(guān)系均重于中歐關(guān)系。在全球地緣戰(zhàn)略格局中,中美歐關(guān)系遠(yuǎn)不及中美蘇、美歐蘇三角關(guān)系成熟和重要,并沒有形成典型的三角關(guān)系。冷戰(zhàn)后特別是“9·11”事件、美伊戰(zhàn)爭后,美歐矛盾日益凸顯,中歐互動(dòng)令人矚目。中歐同時(shí)面臨來自美國地緣政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)和文化的壓力,美國日益感受到來自中、歐的威脅。但美國無法控制的是,中歐關(guān)系已不再是“派生性”關(guān)系。中歐關(guān)系發(fā)展的獨(dú)立性日益增強(qiáng)。中美歐三角關(guān)系已悄然形成。中美歐三角關(guān)系對抗性下降,競爭合作性加強(qiáng),具有非對抗性和“非零和性”特點(diǎn)。三角利益交織在一起,互動(dòng)頻繁。 如何處理好中美、中歐以及中美歐三角關(guān)系是中國面臨的一個(gè)現(xiàn)實(shí)問題。中美關(guān)系的主題正在從“中國問題”演變?yōu)椤爸袊绕饐栴}”,內(nèi)容更豐富,內(nèi)涵更深刻。積極發(fā)展但同時(shí)要冷靜對待中歐關(guān)系。立足周邊,積極開展“大周邊外交”戰(zhàn)略,為中國的發(fā)展?fàn)I造一個(gè)和平穩(wěn)定的地緣環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:2005 marks the 30th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the EU. At present, China-EU relations are in the most active and fruitful period in history, with broad prospects. These two political entities, both on the two ends of the Eurasian continent, are rising. A stable, long-term strategic partnership is being built that will have an important impact on the reorganized world order and help to build a more balanced one. The United States is not only a factor to promote and restrict the strategic approach of China and the EU, but also a major external force influencing China-EU relations. From the geo-strategic point of view, the paper observes the interaction between China, the United States and Europe, with the interpretation of geostrategic related concepts as the starting point. This paper discusses the research contents and characteristics of geo-strategy. Geo-strategy is a kind of strategic theory developed from geo-politics, but with the change of geo-structure in the world, the theory of geostrategic theory is studied. The methods and perspectives of analysis are becoming more and more diverse and comprehensive. At the same time, attention is paid to the analysis of geo-economy and geo-culture. China and Europe are the two pillars of the Eurasian power structure, and the United States is a maritime country far from Eurasia. Eurasia has always been the focus of America's geo-strategy. To counter the threat from the Eurasian hinterland, the United States strictly controlled the development of the geostrategic relationship between China and Europe, making it a passive "derivative relationship": for the same reason. Both China and Europe put the development of geostrategic relations with the United States in the first place. Sino-US relations and US-European relations are all more important than China-EU relations. In the global geo-strategic pattern, Sino-US and European relations are far less than those of China, the United States and the Soviet Union. The triangular relationship between the United States, Europe and the Soviet Union is mature and important, but it has not formed a typical triangular relationship. After the Cold War, especially the September 11 incident, the conflicts between the United States and Europe became increasingly prominent after the US-Iraq war. China-EU interaction is remarkable. China and Europe are also facing geopolitical, economic and cultural pressures from the United States, and the United States is increasingly feeling the threat from China and Europe. But what the United States cannot control is. China-EU relations are no longer "derivative" relations. The independence of the development of China-EU relations is increasing. The triangular relationship between China, the United States and Europe has quietly formed. The antagonism between China, the United States and Europe has declined, and competition and cooperation have been strengthened. It has the characteristics of non-adversarial and non-zero-sum. Triangular interests are intertwined and interact frequently. How to deal well with the triangular relations between China and the United States, China and the United States and Europe is a realistic problem facing China. The theme of Sino-US relations is changing from the "China issue" to "the issue of China's rise", with more contents. Positive development but at the same time should treat China-EU relations calmly. Based on the periphery, actively develop the strategy of "big peripheral diplomacy" to create a peaceful and stable geographical environment for China's development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D751;D871.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 顧強(qiáng);歐盟對華決策中的主體間認(rèn)知差異評析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

2 張辛雨;中國與中亞能源開發(fā)合作研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 何火萍;冷戰(zhàn)后中日兩國東南亞地緣戰(zhàn)略比較研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

2 楊詠奕;論歐盟跨國公司對中歐關(guān)系的影響[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年

3 蔡朝暉;國際非政府組織的消極作用及應(yīng)對對策[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2013年

4 徐思蓉;美國對緬甸價(jià)值觀外交及其轉(zhuǎn)變（1988-2013）[D];外交學(xué)院;2013年

，

本文編號：1465212