【摘要】：對(duì)于當(dāng)前中國(guó)社會(huì)的階級(jí)或階層結(jié)構(gòu)變化,不同文獻(xiàn)的作者做了不同描述。通過分析,我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn),無論是從這些不同描述各自可能獲得的事實(shí)依據(jù)角度,還是從在這些不同描述背后起著支撐、引導(dǎo)和約束作用的那些話語系統(tǒng)的合理性、適用性角度而言,我們都很難找到充分的根據(jù)來對(duì)這些不同描述的"真實(shí)性""正確性"進(jìn)行終極性的判決。我們所能夠做的,只是將它們視為這些文獻(xiàn)的作者在不同社會(huì)分層話語系統(tǒng)的引導(dǎo)和約束下對(duì)當(dāng)代中國(guó)的社會(huì)分層狀況所做的一種話語建構(gòu),努力地去把握引導(dǎo)和約束著這些文獻(xiàn)的作者將它們建構(gòu)出來的那些話語系統(tǒng),以此來對(duì)它們各自的價(jià)值和局限達(dá)到一種相對(duì)而言比較恰當(dāng)?shù)睦斫狻?br/>[Abstract]:The authors of different literature give different descriptions of the changes of class or class structure in Chinese society at present. Through the analysis, we can find that it is difficult to find a sufficient basis for the final judgment of the "authenticity" and "correctness" of these different descriptions, both from the point of view of the possible factual basis of these different descriptions, or from the rationality and applicability of those discourse systems that play a supporting, guiding and binding role behind these different descriptions. All we can do is regard them as a kind of discourse construction made by the authors of these documents under the guidance and restriction of different social hierarchical discourse systems, and strive to grasp the discourse systems that guide and restrain the authors of these documents to construct them, so as to reach a relatively appropriate understanding of their respective values and limitations.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)系;
【分類號(hào)】：D663

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 何云峰;胡建;;馬克思主義中國(guó)化與當(dāng)代話語系統(tǒng)轉(zhuǎn)換[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 國(guó)防大學(xué)教授 公方彬;政改延遲緣于政治觀未突破[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2012年

2 劉宗發(fā);和諧社會(huì)的話語系統(tǒng)[N];湖北日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2521620