從合作到疏離:一項(xiàng)基于G市Z機(jī)構(gòu)與S街道間關(guān)系變遷的實(shí)證研究
[Abstract]:As an active attempt to explore the modernization of national governance, government purchase service plays an important role in the construction of community governance system, and gradually forms the grass-roots community governance pattern of "pluralistic and co-governing". However, the government purchase of services is still in its infancy. The interaction between social service organizations and the government, the function of each governance body, and the logic of action are the key factors for the orderly realization of community construction. In the empirical study, the author finds that the interaction between government and society is in dynamic change and shows different characteristics in different stages of development. However, the current research on the process characteristics of political and social interaction and the logic and substance of action behind it is still insufficient. In view of this, based on the practice of comprehensive family service of S street government in G city, through reviewing and reflecting on the theory of state-social relations, this paper establishes an analytical framework of "action logic and relationship change". This paper probes into the whole process and characteristics of the establishment and maintenance of the interactive relationship between the Z institution and the service buyer S street, and attempts to analyze the logic of action and the changes of the relationship between the two sides in the interaction between the government and the society. In order to respond to the nature of the relationship between political and social interaction. When S Street Family Integrated Service Center was established, the two sides reached a consensus based on the community construction goal and formed a relatively stable relationship of subordination and cooperation under the sight of strong government. In the development period, with the increasing government intervention and intervention, the relationship between the two sides falls into conflict and opposition due to the multiple storms, and after entering the buffer period, the political and social relations are relaxed under the effect of multiple service, but there are still many contradictions behind them. In the final stage, the occurrence of "crisis intervention event" is like a catalyst that directly causes the original cooperative and interactive relationship between the two sides to break down, and the new social organization replaces the Z organization and begins a new round of political and social interaction. In the whole process of interaction between government and society, the author thinks that under the sight of strong government and weak society, because both parties follow different logic of action, the government "act according to the rules" and the social organization "work according to the need". As a result, the interaction between government and society is always in the dynamic change, and also reflects the process of the change of the essence of the political and social relations: from instrumental reciprocity to inhibition, to competition, and then to alienation. At the same time, this paper discusses the causes of the breakup of the relationship between politics and society, and further discusses the irreplaceable social work service in the concrete practice. The purpose of this paper is to provide suggestions for the construction of benign political and social relations and the development of social work services in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D669.3
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 云風(fēng);;功能互補(bǔ),服務(wù)互動(dòng) 最終達(dá)到共生互利[J];社會(huì)工作上半月(實(shí)務(wù));2007年07期
2 周林剛;黃亮;;從無(wú)權(quán)到增權(quán):社會(huì)服務(wù)組織成長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題探討——以深圳S助殘組織為個(gè)案[J];學(xué)習(xí)與實(shí)踐;2012年05期
3 向飛;;國(guó)際非營(yíng)利社會(huì)服務(wù)組織未來(lái)發(fā)展的壓力和問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)組織;2013年04期
4 周永新;;國(guó)際社會(huì)服務(wù)組織(ISS)[J];社會(huì)工作上半月(實(shí)務(wù));2007年07期
5 李卓;中國(guó)NGO的定義與分類[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2003年03期
6 李敬;;以培養(yǎng)康復(fù)社會(huì)工作者為抓手 充分發(fā)揮社會(huì)服務(wù)組織的作用[J];中國(guó)殘疾人;2013年01期
7 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 民革鞍山市委員會(huì) 發(fā)言人 市政協(xié)委員 民革立山支部主委 立山區(qū)服務(wù)局局長(zhǎng) 安寧;關(guān)于推進(jìn)鞍山社區(qū)建設(shè)的建議[N];鞍山日?qǐng)?bào);2011年
2 記者 武盾邋通訊員 汪東 趙書民 林俊鋒;商州“雙創(chuàng)”活動(dòng)拓展黨建新路[N];陜西日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
3 王佳 黑龍江省民族研究所;美國(guó)宗教慈善組織與普通慈善組織籌款能力比較[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2011年
4 本報(bào)見習(xí)記者 張小葉;發(fā)揮優(yōu)勢(shì),選準(zhǔn)培植土壤[N];文匯報(bào);2011年
5 邵金榮;公益性民辦社會(huì)服務(wù)組織的規(guī)范[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2004年
6 符正成;社區(qū)建設(shè)引發(fā)社會(huì)公共服務(wù)組織的發(fā)展[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2003年
7 特約通訊員 周鋼 劉路;1470個(gè)社區(qū)為武漢建設(shè)幸福城市提速[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2012年
8 記者 黃惠民;滬上社會(huì)組織建設(shè)亟盼“提速”[N];組織人事報(bào);2010年
9 閻青春;社會(huì)福利社會(huì)化,,中介組織如何定位?[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2000年
10 ;抓住世博機(jī)遇 推動(dòng)社會(huì)發(fā)展[N];文匯報(bào);2003年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條
1 鐘燕;社會(huì)治理視閾下殘疾人社會(huì)服務(wù)組織與政府關(guān)系研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2014年
2 胡楊;社會(huì)工作模式在共青團(tuán)青少年工作中的嵌入式發(fā)展研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2015年
3 羅培鋒;基督教社會(huì)服務(wù)組織的身份建構(gòu)[D];華僑大學(xué);2016年
4 高麗;從合作到疏離:一項(xiàng)基于G市Z機(jī)構(gòu)與S街道間關(guān)系變遷的實(shí)證研究[D];華東理工大學(xué);2017年
5 劉佳;草根社會(huì)服務(wù)組織社會(huì)資本與籌資能力研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年
6 李馳婷;社會(huì)服務(wù)組織自治的條件和困境的研究[D];云南大學(xué);2014年
7 付一丹;宗教社會(huì)服務(wù)組織的有效性研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年
本文編號(hào):2406520
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2406520.html