發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-10 16:12

【摘要】：政府購(gòu)買服務(wù)作為一種探索國(guó)家治理現(xiàn)代化的積極嘗試,在社區(qū)治理體系建設(shè)中發(fā)揮著重要作用,并逐步形成“多元共治”的基層社區(qū)治理格局。但是,我國(guó)政府購(gòu)買服務(wù)尚處于起步階段,社會(huì)服務(wù)組織與政府的互動(dòng)關(guān)系,各個(gè)治理主體的功能角色、行動(dòng)邏輯等成為社區(qū)建設(shè)能否有序?qū)崿F(xiàn)的關(guān)鍵要素。在實(shí)證研究中,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)政社互動(dòng)關(guān)系處于動(dòng)態(tài)變化之中,且在不同發(fā)展階段呈現(xiàn)出差異性特征。而目前關(guān)于政社互動(dòng)的過(guò)程特征及其背后的行動(dòng)邏輯和實(shí)質(zhì)關(guān)系研究尚屬不足。對(duì)此,文章基于G市S街道政府家庭綜合服務(wù)的實(shí)踐,通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)家-社會(huì)關(guān)系理論的回顧與反思,建立了“行動(dòng)邏輯-關(guān)系變遷”的分析框架,深入探討了服務(wù)承接方Z機(jī)構(gòu)與服務(wù)購(gòu)買方S街道之間互動(dòng)關(guān)系建立、維系的整個(gè)過(guò)程及其特征,并嘗試剖析政社互動(dòng)中雙方的行動(dòng)邏輯及關(guān)系變遷,以期回應(yīng)政社互動(dòng)的關(guān)系實(shí)質(zhì)。在S街家庭綜合服務(wù)中心初建時(shí),政社雙方基于社區(qū)建設(shè)目標(biāo)達(dá)成共識(shí),形成了強(qiáng)政府視閾下相對(duì)穩(wěn)定的從屬與合作關(guān)系；在發(fā)展期,隨著政府干預(yù)與介入的日趨加強(qiáng),多重風(fēng)波致使雙方關(guān)系陷入沖突與對(duì)立之中；進(jìn)入緩沖期后,在多重服務(wù)效應(yīng)下政社關(guān)系有所緩和,但背后仍存有諸多矛盾；在最后階段,“危機(jī)介入事件”的發(fā)生猶如催化劑直接致使雙方原有的合作互動(dòng)關(guān)系破裂,新的社會(huì)組織取代Z機(jī)構(gòu),開始新一輪政社互動(dòng)關(guān)系的磨合。整個(gè)政社互動(dòng)過(guò)程中,筆者認(rèn)為在強(qiáng)政府-弱社會(huì)視閾下,由于政社雙方遵循著不同的行動(dòng)邏輯,政府的“按‘章’辦事”、社會(huì)組織的“按‘需’做事”,致使政社互動(dòng)始終處于動(dòng)態(tài)的變化之中,同時(shí)也映射出政社關(guān)系實(shí)質(zhì)的變化過(guò)程：從工具性互惠關(guān)系到抑制關(guān)系,再到競(jìng)爭(zhēng)關(guān)系,再到疏離關(guān)系。同時(shí),本文對(duì)政社關(guān)系疏離破裂的原因進(jìn)行了相應(yīng)的討論反思,也進(jìn)一步討論了社會(huì)工作服務(wù)在具體實(shí)踐中的不可替代性,以期對(duì)良性政社關(guān)系的構(gòu)建以及未來(lái)社會(huì)工作服務(wù)的發(fā)展提供可借鑒性意見。
[Abstract]:As an active attempt to explore the modernization of national governance, government purchase service plays an important role in the construction of community governance system, and gradually forms the grass-roots community governance pattern of "pluralistic and co-governing". However, the government purchase of services is still in its infancy. The interaction between social service organizations and the government, the function of each governance body, and the logic of action are the key factors for the orderly realization of community construction. In the empirical study, the author finds that the interaction between government and society is in dynamic change and shows different characteristics in different stages of development. However, the current research on the process characteristics of political and social interaction and the logic and substance of action behind it is still insufficient. In view of this, based on the practice of comprehensive family service of S street government in G city, through reviewing and reflecting on the theory of state-social relations, this paper establishes an analytical framework of "action logic and relationship change". This paper probes into the whole process and characteristics of the establishment and maintenance of the interactive relationship between the Z institution and the service buyer S street, and attempts to analyze the logic of action and the changes of the relationship between the two sides in the interaction between the government and the society. In order to respond to the nature of the relationship between political and social interaction. When S Street Family Integrated Service Center was established, the two sides reached a consensus based on the community construction goal and formed a relatively stable relationship of subordination and cooperation under the sight of strong government. In the development period, with the increasing government intervention and intervention, the relationship between the two sides falls into conflict and opposition due to the multiple storms, and after entering the buffer period, the political and social relations are relaxed under the effect of multiple service, but there are still many contradictions behind them. In the final stage, the occurrence of "crisis intervention event" is like a catalyst that directly causes the original cooperative and interactive relationship between the two sides to break down, and the new social organization replaces the Z organization and begins a new round of political and social interaction. In the whole process of interaction between government and society, the author thinks that under the sight of strong government and weak society, because both parties follow different logic of action, the government "act according to the rules" and the social organization "work according to the need". As a result, the interaction between government and society is always in the dynamic change, and also reflects the process of the change of the essence of the political and social relations: from instrumental reciprocity to inhibition, to competition, and then to alienation. At the same time, this paper discusses the causes of the breakup of the relationship between politics and society, and further discusses the irreplaceable social work service in the concrete practice. The purpose of this paper is to provide suggestions for the construction of benign political and social relations and the development of social work services in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D669.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 云風(fēng);;功能互補(bǔ),服務(wù)互動(dòng) 最終達(dá)到共生互利[J];社會(huì)工作上半月(實(shí)務(wù));2007年07期

2 周林剛;黃亮;;從無(wú)權(quán)到增權(quán):社會(huì)服務(wù)組織成長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題探討——以深圳S助殘組織為個(gè)案[J];學(xué)習(xí)與實(shí)踐;2012年05期

3 向飛;;國(guó)際非營(yíng)利社會(huì)服務(wù)組織未來(lái)發(fā)展的壓力和問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)組織;2013年04期

4 周永新;;國(guó)際社會(huì)服務(wù)組織(ISS)[J];社會(huì)工作上半月(實(shí)務(wù));2007年07期

5 李卓;中國(guó)NGO的定義與分類[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2003年03期

6 李敬;;以培養(yǎng)康復(fù)社會(huì)工作者為抓手 充分發(fā)揮社會(huì)服務(wù)組織的作用[J];中國(guó)殘疾人;2013年01期

7 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 民革鞍山市委員會(huì) 發(fā)言人 市政協(xié)委員 民革立山支部主委 立山區(qū)服務(wù)局局長(zhǎng) 安寧;關(guān)于推進(jìn)鞍山社區(qū)建設(shè)的建議[N];鞍山日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

2 記者 武盾邋通訊員 汪東 趙書民 林俊鋒;商州“雙創(chuàng)”活動(dòng)拓展黨建新路[N];陜西日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

3 王佳 黑龍江省民族研究所;美國(guó)宗教慈善組織與普通慈善組織籌款能力比較[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2011年

4 本報(bào)見習(xí)記者 張小葉;發(fā)揮優(yōu)勢(shì),選準(zhǔn)培植土壤[N];文匯報(bào);2011年

5 邵金榮;公益性民辦社會(huì)服務(wù)組織的規(guī)范[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

6 符正成;社區(qū)建設(shè)引發(fā)社會(huì)公共服務(wù)組織的發(fā)展[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2003年

7 特約通訊員 周鋼 劉路;1470個(gè)社區(qū)為武漢建設(shè)幸福城市提速[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2012年

8 記者 黃惠民;滬上社會(huì)組織建設(shè)亟盼“提速”[N];組織人事報(bào);2010年

9 閻青春;社會(huì)福利社會(huì)化，，中介組織如何定位？[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2000年

10 ;抓住世博機(jī)遇 推動(dòng)社會(huì)發(fā)展[N];文匯報(bào);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 鐘燕;社會(huì)治理視閾下殘疾人社會(huì)服務(wù)組織與政府關(guān)系研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2014年

2 胡楊;社會(huì)工作模式在共青團(tuán)青少年工作中的嵌入式發(fā)展研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2015年

3 羅培鋒;基督教社會(huì)服務(wù)組織的身份建構(gòu)[D];華僑大學(xué);2016年

4 高麗;從合作到疏離：一項(xiàng)基于G市Z機(jī)構(gòu)與S街道間關(guān)系變遷的實(shí)證研究[D];華東理工大學(xué);2017年

5 劉佳;草根社會(huì)服務(wù)組織社會(huì)資本與籌資能力研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

6 李馳婷;社會(huì)服務(wù)組織自治的條件和困境的研究[D];云南大學(xué);2014年

7 付一丹;宗教社會(huì)服務(wù)組織的有效性研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：2406520