【摘要】：全國人大常委會的"試點授權"為改革試點突破現行規(guī)定提供了法律依據,成為了"重大改革于法有據"的示范性舉措;然而,其示范意義不應流于為相關改革提供形式依據,其內容自身首先應符合法律規(guī)定及其所蘊含的法律原理。衡量"試點授權"是否實質性"于法有據",可從四類要素分析:從權限要素看,"試點授權"應限于非憲法保留事項和常委會自身有立法權限的事項;從時間要素看,應先于試點改革而作出,并符合授權期限;從后果要素看,"試點授權"到期之后根據試點情況而發(fā)生試點推廣、變更或延長等不同法律后果;空間要素上,授權空間在范圍上具有部分性以及與授權事項的關聯性。
[Abstract]:The "pilot authorization" of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress provides the legal basis for the reform to break through the existing regulations, and has become an exemplary measure of "major reform on the basis of law". However, its demonstrative significance should not be a formal basis for the relevant reform, and its content itself should first accord with the legal provisions and the legal principles contained therein. To measure whether the "pilot authorization" is substantial "according to the law" can be analyzed from four kinds of elements: from the view of the competence factor, the "pilot authorization" should be limited to the non-constitutional reservation and the matters with the standing Committee's own legislative competence; From the point of view of the time factor, it should be made before the pilot reform and accord with the period of authorization; from the point of view of the consequence factor, different legal consequences such as extension, modification or extension of the pilot should occur according to the situation of the pilot project after the expiration of the "pilot authorization"; In the space element, the authorization space has the partial character in the scope and the correlation with the authorization item.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學光華法學院;2011計劃司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;清華大學法學院;
【基金】：國家2011計劃司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心研究成果 國家社科青年項目《全國人大常委會監(jiān)督權行使機制研究》(批準號:10CFX005)成果
【分類號】：D622;D921

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 廖加龍;;日本的授權立法和立法中的公眾參與[J];人大研究;2014年05期

2 李煒光;;人大應當怎么授權?[J];民主與科學;2007年05期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 李林;英國議會及政府的立法權限[N];學習時報;2005年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 何嘉飛;全國人大常委會中止實施法律研究[D];廣東財經大學;2016年

，

本文編號：2337646