【摘要】：唐宋變革是個較為復(fù)雜的論題,只怕很難以"對"或"錯"一字蔽之。唐宋變革論各式各樣,然而如今學(xué)者每提及唐宋變革論,大有言必稱內(nèi)藤湖南之勢。其實,日本學(xué)界有京都學(xué)派與東京學(xué)派之分,并非"內(nèi)藤假說"一統(tǒng)天下。尤其值得注意的是,我國學(xué)者有自己的唐宋變革論,且源遠流長,豈能數(shù)典忘祖。唐宋變革不是斷裂,而是因革。包偉民新近提出的唐宋會通論,對唐宋變革論不是顛覆,而是補充和完善。唐宋變革論與會通論相輔相成、兼容互補、相得益彰。
[Abstract]:The change of Tang and Song dynasties is a complicated topic, but it is difficult to correct or wrong. The Tang and Song dynasties change theory is various, but now scholars every mention of Tang and Song Dynasty change theory, great speech must be called Neito Hunan trend. As a matter of fact, Japanese scholars are divided into Kyoto school and Tokyo school, not the Nito hypothesis. It is especially noteworthy that Chinese scholars have their own theory of change in the Tang and Song dynasties, and have a long history. The revolution in Tang and Song dynasties was not a rupture, but a revolution. The general theory of Tang and Song Dynasty put forward recently by Bao Weimin is not subversive, but complementary and perfect to the theory of change in Tang and Song dynasties. Tang and Song dynasties change theory participation complementary, compatible and complementary, mutually reinforcing.
【作者單位】： 四川師范大學(xué)歷史文化與旅游學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D691.2
，

本文編號：2169964