【摘要】：本文的研究主要圍繞一個(gè)核心問題展開：在加入歐盟所帶來的巨大收益預(yù)期誘導(dǎo)下，為什么有些國家總是充滿熱情的向著歐盟集體身份轉(zhuǎn)變和進(jìn)化，并呈現(xiàn)一種身份聚合的動(dòng)力，而有些國家則始終不愿完全實(shí)現(xiàn)自我身份的歐洲化轉(zhuǎn)變和進(jìn)化，反而形成一種身份分離的動(dòng)力呢？先前關(guān)于歐洲化的研究分別是以物質(zhì)或觀念為理論基礎(chǔ)，，以此建構(gòu)不同的理論模型。以物質(zhì)主義為基礎(chǔ)的理論缺乏對(duì)身份認(rèn)同、話語等觀念性因素的重視，偏向于關(guān)注對(duì)歐洲化進(jìn)程中歐盟層面的權(quán)力以及入盟所帶來的利益等相關(guān)因素的研究，而以觀念為基礎(chǔ)的理論雖然避免了以簡(jiǎn)單的成本-收益為基礎(chǔ)的分析視角，但是與物質(zhì)主義一樣，這類理論同樣秉持的是結(jié)構(gòu)主義分析，沒有將國家這個(gè)“黑箱”徹底打開，也就不能清晰地闡述國家自身對(duì)歐盟和歐洲化進(jìn)程的認(rèn)知，進(jìn)而忽視了“內(nèi)因”的基礎(chǔ)作用。因此，這些理論框架都不能對(duì)本文所提出的研究問題提出恰當(dāng)?shù)慕忉�。基于這些理論的不足，本文提出了自傳體敘述與身份進(jìn)化的動(dòng)力這一分析框架，在此基礎(chǔ)上展開理論假設(shè)，并利用塞爾維亞和克羅地亞兩國的歐洲化進(jìn)程進(jìn)行案例分析。 本文所提出的分析框架認(rèn)為，國家的自傳體敘述在影響自我身份建構(gòu)和認(rèn)同他者的進(jìn)程中起到了關(guān)鍵的作用。自傳體敘述不僅建構(gòu)了自我的身份而且也影響了國家對(duì)自我和他者的認(rèn)知。因此在某個(gè)國家或組織認(rèn)同并接受其他國家或組織的過程中，該國或這個(gè)組織的自傳體敘述會(huì)對(duì)這一進(jìn)程產(chǎn)生關(guān)鍵性的影響。本文將這一進(jìn)程假定為一種身份進(jìn)化的進(jìn)程，也即由于自我對(duì)他者認(rèn)同的提升使得自我的身份定位朝向他者群體成員身份聚合的話語實(shí)踐過程。為了更加清晰地理解國家自傳體敘述的構(gòu)成內(nèi)容及其對(duì)身份進(jìn)化動(dòng)力的影響，本文依據(jù)國家身份建構(gòu)理論和廣義敘述學(xué)的相關(guān)知識(shí)，將構(gòu)成國家的自傳體敘述分為三個(gè)維度，即抽象層面的神話敘述，政治精英層面的敘述操控以及社會(huì)大眾層面的歷史教育。每個(gè)維度都能獨(dú)立的影響到自我對(duì)他者的認(rèn)知效果和身份進(jìn)化的動(dòng)力，同時(shí)三個(gè)層面也是相互聯(lián)系的過程，抽象層面的神話敘述為政治精英層面的敘述操控提供了背景知識(shí)和敘述素材，同時(shí)通過歷史教育使國家的敘述內(nèi)容和敘述思想進(jìn)一步深入社會(huì)大眾，并形成一種國民意識(shí)和國家性。由于不同國家對(duì)于同一種認(rèn)同進(jìn)程可能存在不同的自傳體敘述，因此，不同的國家對(duì)于像歐洲化這樣的議程可能采取不同的態(tài)度。為此，本文將國家的身份進(jìn)化分為兩種進(jìn)程效果，即身份聚合與身份分離。兩種進(jìn)程效果分別代表了身份進(jìn)化中存在的兩種動(dòng)力，而動(dòng)力差異的來源就在于國家自傳體敘述的影響。 論文選擇以塞爾維亞和克羅地亞的歐洲化進(jìn)程作為案例進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證。由于歷史上曾經(jīng)同處一個(gè)國家，因此這兩個(gè)國家在許多方面都具有相同之處，雖然具有這些歷史共同點(diǎn)，但是他們的歐洲化路徑卻出現(xiàn)了截然不同的進(jìn)程。為此本文依據(jù)理論部分的分析框架，對(duì)自傳體敘述的三個(gè)維度依次進(jìn)行了分析，并分別對(duì)三個(gè)維度如何影響這兩個(gè)國家向歐盟集體成員資格身份進(jìn)化的動(dòng)力過程進(jìn)行了研究。通過詳細(xì)的論證，本文證實(shí)了此項(xiàng)研究所提出的理論假設(shè)和變量之間的因果性。
[Abstract]:This study focuses on a core issue: why some countries are always passionate about the transformation and evolution of the European Union's collective identity and the impetus for the identity polymerization, while some countries are not willing to fully realize their self identity Europeanization at the beginning. Instead of changing and evolving, instead of forming a power of identity separation, previous studies on Europeanization were based on material or concept as the theoretical basis to construct different theoretical models. The theory based on materialism lacks the emphasis on identity, discourse and other conceptual factors, and is biased towards the EU layer in the process of Europeanization. The research on the related factors such as the power and the benefits brought by the union, while the concept based theory avoids the simple cost income based analysis perspective, but like materialism, this kind of theory also holds the structural analysis, and does not completely open the "black box" of the country. A clear explanation of the state's own awareness of the European Union and the Europeanization process, and the neglect of the underlying role of "internal cause". Therefore, these theoretical frameworks can not give a proper explanation of the research issues proposed in this article. Based on the shortcomings of these theories, this paper proposes an analytical framework for the motive force of autobiographical narration and identity evolution. On this basis, the theoretical assumptions are developed, and the Europeanization process of Serbia and Croatia is used for case analysis.
The analytical framework proposed in this paper holds that the state's autobiographical narrative plays a key role in the process of influencing self identity construction and identifying others. The autobiographical narrative not only constructs the identity of the self but also affects the state's cognition of the self and the other. In the process of organization, the autobiographical narration of the country or the organization will have a critical impact on this process. This process is assumed to be a process of identity evolution, that is, the process of discourse practice in which self identity is directed towards the other group as a result of the promotion of self identity. A clear understanding of the composition of national autobiographical narration and its influence on the dynamics of identity evolution will be divided into three dimensions based on the theory of national identity construction and the related knowledge of general narratology, which constitute the state's autobiographical narration, that is, the myth narrative at the level of abstraction, the narrative manipulation of the political elite level and the social public level. Every dimension can affect the cognitive effect of self and the power of identity evolution independently. At the same time, the three levels are also interconnected. The abstract level of mythological narrative provides the background knowledge and narrative material for the narrative manipulation of the political elite level, while making the national narrative through historical education. The idea of capacity and narration further penetrates the public and forms a national consciousness and national nature. Since different countries may have different autobiographical descriptions of the same identification process, different countries may take different states of state for such agendas such as Europeanization. Therefore, this article divides the state's identity evolution into two The effect of the process is identity polymerization and identity separation. The two process effects represent the two motive forces in the identity evolution, and the source of the dynamic difference lies in the influence of the national autobiographical narrative.
The thesis chooses the Europeanization process of Serbia and Croatia as a case study. Because of the history of the same country, the two countries have similarities in many aspects. Although they have these common points of history, their Europeanization paths have different processes. This article is based on this article. The analytical framework of the theoretical part analyses the three dimensions of the autobiographical narrative in turn, and studies how the three dimensions influence the dynamic process of the evolution of the two countries to the EU collective membership. Through the detailed argument, this paper confirms the theoretical hypothesis and the cause of the variables proposed by the study. Fruit character.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D755.53;D754.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林民旺;朱立群;;國際規(guī)范的國內(nèi)化:國內(nèi)結(jié)構(gòu)的影響及傳播機(jī)制[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2011年01期

2 王曉升;科學(xué)知識(shí)和敘事知識(shí)及其關(guān)系——利奧塔對(duì)后現(xiàn)代知識(shí)狀況的分析及其啟示[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2001年01期

3 秦亞青;;作為關(guān)系過程的國際社會(huì)——制度、身份與中國和平崛起[J];國際政治科學(xué);2010年04期

4 李俊;“大塞爾維亞主義”的興衰及其影響[J];國際資料信息;2000年11期

5 朱立群;;歐洲一體化理論:研究問題、路徑與特點(diǎn)[J];國際政治研究;2008年04期

6 聶文娟;;現(xiàn)代語言建構(gòu)主義及“實(shí)踐性”的缺失[J];國際政治研究;2010年04期

7 白伊維;;歐洲主義與民族主義的較量:克羅地亞社民黨的演變[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2013年03期

8 趙文城;;克羅地亞的悠悠獨(dú)立夢(mèng)[J];世界博覽;1996年02期

9 彼得·豪爾,羅斯瑪麗·泰勒,何俊智;政治科學(xué)與三個(gè)新制度主義[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2003年05期

10 應(yīng)星;;略論敘事在中國社會(huì)研究中的運(yùn)用及其限制[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

本文編號(hào)：2127630