本文選題：世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移 + G20��； 參考：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移蘊(yùn)含著國家間權(quán)力的此消彼長,每一個(gè)權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移的末端都伴隨著國際秩序的重建。在理論方面,國際關(guān)系一般在現(xiàn)實(shí)主義、新自由制度主義與建構(gòu)主義的框架下,將世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移與戰(zhàn)爭、國際制度以及文化認(rèn)同相聯(lián)系。在世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移歷史路徑方面,法國作為第一個(gè)現(xiàn)代意義上的世界性主導(dǎo)國遭到來自英國崛起的挑戰(zhàn),最終通過戰(zhàn)爭的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移。英國與美國則利用國際制度的推動(dòng)作用實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移的平穩(wěn)過渡。這說明,隨著時(shí)代的發(fā)展以及國際制度水平的提高,國際制度能夠促使國家間權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移以制度平穩(wěn)的方式進(jìn)行。當(dāng)代世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移呈現(xiàn)新特點(diǎn),包括:由西方國家間權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移轉(zhuǎn)變至東西方國家間權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移、由國際制度單一模式向制度多元化包容性模式轉(zhuǎn)變、以危機(jī)共同管理與全球治理為契機(jī)實(shí)現(xiàn)世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移。現(xiàn)階段,G20作為當(dāng)代世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的首要論壇,其論壇性質(zhì)影響深遠(yuǎn),已成為世界各國討論國際金融治理的首要機(jī)制。G20作為當(dāng)前最高的全球治理機(jī)制,其機(jī)制特點(diǎn)回應(yīng)并影響了當(dāng)代世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移的新特點(diǎn)。G20機(jī)相較于傳統(tǒng)全球治理機(jī)制,G20機(jī)制更具有效性與代表性;G20囊括了G7以及金磚國家為代表的發(fā)達(dá)國家與新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體,集團(tuán)成員更加勢(shì)均力敵,有利于形成更為開放性的機(jī)制,促進(jìn)世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移朝平穩(wěn)的方式過渡;當(dāng)今世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移以金融危機(jī)為契機(jī),G20具有更強(qiáng)的金融危機(jī)管理機(jī)制。目前,隨著以中國為代表的新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體的崛起,會(huì)以戰(zhàn)爭暴力亦或國際制度推動(dòng)的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)世界性權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移成為一個(gè)相當(dāng)重要的問題。本文認(rèn)為,G20機(jī)制需不完美,但它體現(xiàn)了未來全球治理機(jī)制的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),發(fā)達(dá)國家與新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體國家將有望在G20框架內(nèi)實(shí)現(xiàn)世界性權(quán)力的平穩(wěn)過渡。
[Abstract]:The transfer of power in the world implies the rise and fall of power among nations, and the end of each power transfer is accompanied by the reconstruction of the international order. In theory, international relations generally link world power transfer with war, international system and cultural identity under the framework of realism, neo-liberal institutionalism and constructivism. In the aspect of the historical path of the world power transfer, France, as the first world leading country in the modern sense, was challenged by the rise of Britain, and finally realized the power transfer through the way of war. The United Kingdom and the United States use the international system to promote the smooth transition of power transfer. This shows that with the development of the times and the improvement of the international system, the international system can promote the transfer of power between countries in a stable way. The contemporary world power transfer presents new characteristics, including: from the power transfer between the western countries to the power transfer between the East and the West, from the single model of the international system to the inclusive model of the pluralistic system. Take the crisis co-management and the global governance as the opportunity to realize the world power transfer. At the present stage, the G20, as the leading forum of the contemporary world economy, has a far-reaching impact on its nature, and has become the primary mechanism for discussing international financial governance in all countries of the world. The G20 is the highest current global governance mechanism. Its institutional characteristics respond to and influence the new features of power transfer in the contemporary world. The G20 mechanism is more effective and representative than the traditional global governance mechanism. The G20 includes the G7 and the developed and emerging economies represented by the BRICS. Group members are more even, which is conducive to the formation of a more open mechanism to promote the world power transfer to a smooth transition; nowadays, the world power transfer takes the financial crisis as a turning point and the G20 has a stronger financial crisis management mechanism. At present, with the rise of emerging economies represented by China, it becomes a very important issue to realize the worldwide power transfer in the way of war violence or international system. This paper argues that the G20 mechanism needs to be imperfect, but it reflects the development trend of the global governance mechanism in the future. Developed countries and emerging economies will hopefully achieve a smooth transition of world power within the G20 framework.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D815

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭樹勇;;二十國集團(tuán)的興起與國際社會(huì)的分野[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2016年04期

2 李楊;蘇驍;;G20:美國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)全球經(jīng)濟(jì)治理的新途徑——兼論中國的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2016年02期

3 王瑋;;權(quán)力變遷、責(zé)任協(xié)調(diào)與中美關(guān)系的未來[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2015年05期

4 張盛發(fā);;關(guān)于第一次世界大戰(zhàn)的若干思考——寫在一戰(zhàn)爆發(fā)100周年之際[J];俄羅斯東歐中亞研究;2015年01期

5 李永輝;;權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移與國際秩序轉(zhuǎn)型[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2014年07期

6 劉宏松;;合法性、有效性與G20機(jī)制改革[J];國際觀察;2014年03期

7 約翰·科頓;;二十國集團(tuán)治理的成長——一個(gè)全球化了的世界使然[J];國際展望;2013年05期

8 朱杰進(jìn);;復(fù)合機(jī)制模式與G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)[J];國際觀察;2013年03期

9 徐秀軍;;新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體與全球經(jīng)濟(jì)治理結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2012年10期

10 洪郵生;方晴;;全球經(jīng)濟(jì)治理力量重心的轉(zhuǎn)移:G20與大國的戰(zhàn)略[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2012年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 門洪華;;西方三大霸權(quán)的戰(zhàn)略比較——兼論美國制度霸權(quán)的啟示意義[A];國情報(bào)告（第八卷 2005年（上））[C];2012年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 袁偉華;權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移、國家意志與國際秩序變遷[D];南開大學(xué);2014年

2 侯自強(qiáng);從多邊主義思想到國際制度建立：美國創(chuàng)建聯(lián)合國的經(jīng)驗(yàn)[D];外交學(xué)院;2013年

3 尚偉;世界秩序模式研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 林甜甜;英美貨幣霸權(quán)演變及比較[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

2 李軍政;G8與G20：比較研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2018677