本文選題：一國兩制 + 臺灣模式　； 參考：《西安建筑科技大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來,我國經(jīng)濟、政治實力不斷增強,在“一國兩制”理論指導下,香港、澳門回歸祖國懷抱,但臺灣問題至今未能解決,祖國尚未實現(xiàn)真正意義上的統(tǒng)一。梳理“一國兩制”理論的知識,掌握“一國兩制”臺灣模式的關(guān)系及特點,分析其發(fā)展過程,既能推動“一國兩制”理論的發(fā)展,豐富馬克思主義國家學說,也利于推動當前兩岸關(guān)系的發(fā)展。研究“一國兩制”臺灣模式理論的現(xiàn)實障礙,探究消除障礙的措施,對于實現(xiàn)兩岸和平統(tǒng)一,具有重要的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義。論文以“‘一國兩制’臺灣模式理論的現(xiàn)實障礙研究”為選題,通過文獻分析法對“一國兩制”臺灣模式的相關(guān)理論進行梳理,運用比較分析法對臺灣模式和港澳模式進行比較,以期推動既有理論的創(chuàng)新與發(fā)展。論文在梳理“一國兩制”理論的形成、發(fā)展及實踐的基礎(chǔ)上,分別考察了該理論在制度設計及實際運用方面存在的諸多障礙,在進一步分析上述障礙的原因基礎(chǔ)上,論文提出了與之相對應的宏觀對策。例如,以“特別政治地位”的方式滿足臺灣對“地位平等”的追求,以經(jīng)濟手段實現(xiàn)臺灣的“主權(quán)”追求,并由大陸授權(quán)臺灣在軍事領(lǐng)域“治權(quán)”等措施來完善“一國兩制”臺灣模式的理論設計。在實踐中須加強與臺灣官方、民間的接觸與交流,同時在國際上展開積極外交,以此推動祖國早日實現(xiàn)真正意義的和平統(tǒng)一。在解決臺灣問題這一議題上,“一國兩制”臺灣模式是實現(xiàn)兩岸共同繁榮發(fā)展的最佳方式。論文認為:由于長期的分離和隔閡,要實現(xiàn)兩岸和平統(tǒng)一,大陸單方面的努力遠遠不夠,需要臺灣積極參與協(xié)商。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于對“一國兩制”臺灣模式進行“分板塊”分析,從既有理論設計和兩岸現(xiàn)實的角度入手研究現(xiàn)實障礙,通過借鑒“聯(lián)邦制”的某些特點,給予臺灣一定的“對等地位”。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economic and political strength has been continuously strengthened. Under the guidance of the "one country, two systems" theory, Hong Kong and Macao have returned to the embrace of the motherland, but the Taiwan issue has not yet been resolved, and the motherland has not yet realized real reunification. Combing the knowledge of the theory of "one country, two systems", mastering the relationship and characteristics of the "one country, two systems" Taiwan model, and analyzing its development process can not only promote the development of the theory of "one country, two systems", but also enrich the Marxist theory of state. It is also conducive to promoting the development of current cross-strait relations. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the practical obstacles of the Taiwan model of "one country, two systems" and to explore the measures to remove the obstacles for realizing the peaceful reunification of the two sides of the strait. Based on the topic of "study on the practical obstacles of the" one country, two systems "Taiwan model theory, this paper combs the relevant theories of" one country, two systems "Taiwan model through literature analysis. In order to promote the innovation and development of the existing theories, this paper compares the Taiwan model with the Hong Kong and Macao model by means of comparative analysis. On the basis of combing the formation, development and practice of the theory of "one country, two systems", the paper examines the obstacles in the system design and practical application of the theory, and further analyzes the reasons for the above obstacles. The paper puts forward corresponding macro countermeasures. For example, Taiwan's pursuit of "status equality" is satisfied by "special political status" and Taiwan's "sovereign" pursuit is realized through economic means. And the mainland authorized Taiwan to "govern power" in the military field to perfect the theoretical design of "one country, two systems" Taiwan model. In practice, it is necessary to strengthen contacts and exchanges with Taiwan's officials and people, and at the same time to launch active diplomacy in the international arena, so as to promote the motherland's peaceful reunification of real significance at an early date. On the issue of resolving the Taiwan issue, the "one country, two systems" Taiwan model is the best way to realize the common prosperity and development of the two sides of the strait. The paper holds that because of the long separation and estrangement, the unilateral efforts of the mainland are far from enough to realize the peaceful reunification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and Taiwan needs to actively participate in the consultation. The innovation of this paper lies in the analysis of the Taiwan model of "one country, two systems", the study of practical obstacles from the angle of both theoretical design and cross-strait reality, and the use of some characteristics of "federalism" for reference. Give Taiwan a certain "reciprocal status".
【學位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D618
，

本文編號：2006558