發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-08 15:16

  本文選題：廣州市黃埔區(qū) + “三化”服務(wù)管理�。� 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國省會(huì)城市(包括直轄市)“區(qū)—街—社區(qū)”的基層管理體系已運(yùn)行多年,這種以管控為主要特征的管理模式,在應(yīng)對(duì)城市規(guī)模不斷膨脹、外來人員大量聚集、群眾需求不斷變化等中國式大城市病方面越來越力不從心。如何推進(jìn)城市基層治理創(chuàng)新,是一個(gè)緊迫而重要的課題。適時(shí)對(duì)來自基層的改革創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐進(jìn)行理論思考,明晰城市基層治理創(chuàng)新的模式、路徑和方向,便于區(qū)域性創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的提升和推廣。分析我國傳統(tǒng)城市基層管理模式的特點(diǎn)及其弊端,導(dǎo)出改革創(chuàng)新的兩種極端取向:強(qiáng)化管制和社區(qū)自治,前者屬于“強(qiáng)政府、弱社會(huì)”模式,后者屬于“小政府、強(qiáng)社會(huì)”模式。在此基礎(chǔ)上,提出自己的觀點(diǎn):契合我國國情的改革創(chuàng)新取向應(yīng)該是“強(qiáng)政府、好社會(huì)”的模式,建立完善政府主導(dǎo)的城市基層治理多元主體合作共治模式。剖析我國省會(huì)城市基層治理創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐案例,詳細(xì)介紹黃埔區(qū)“三化”服務(wù)管理改革的基本情況及成效,挖掘其深層意義。筆者認(rèn)為,黃埔“三化”改革為醫(yī)治長期困擾我國城市基層管理的各種頑疾找到了“藥引”,為改造基層治理基因、優(yōu)化基因組合探索了路徑,具體體現(xiàn)在“四個(gè)鏈接”:擺脫了傳統(tǒng)管控模式的路徑依賴,建立了政府管理與社區(qū)自治的有效鏈接;減少了科層制的推諉扯皮,建立了條條與塊塊的有效鏈接;減少了管理主客體的對(duì)立對(duì)峙,建立了管理與服務(wù)的有效鏈接;拓寬了社會(huì)組織的發(fā)展空間,建立了中西方和諧社會(huì)建設(shè)機(jī)制的有效鏈接。本文也列舉和分析了黃埔區(qū)“三化”服務(wù)管理改革面臨的困難問題,其遇到的問題在全國各大城市基層治理創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐中帶有普遍性,根本原因在于,城市基層囿于有限度的管理權(quán)限,改革創(chuàng)新往往淺嘗即止,很難涉足深水區(qū)。有鑒于此,本文側(cè)重于從面上、宏觀層面對(duì)進(jìn)一步提升城市基層治理水平提出對(duì)策建議,具體從推進(jìn)頂層設(shè)計(jì)、樹立法治信仰、協(xié)調(diào)各種關(guān)系、強(qiáng)化服務(wù)功能、突出社區(qū)建設(shè)、培育社會(huì)組織、推進(jìn)機(jī)構(gòu)改革、創(chuàng)新治理手段等8個(gè)方面提出深化改革的對(duì)策措施,希望通過典型引導(dǎo),由點(diǎn)及面,推動(dòng)全國城市基層治理理念更新、治理結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化、治理流程再造、治理主體重構(gòu)、治理技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、治理基因重組,徹底擺脫基層傳統(tǒng)管控模式的路徑依賴,建立政府主導(dǎo)的城市基層治理多元主體合作共治模式。
[Abstract]:The grass-roots management system of "district, street and community" in the provincial capitals of China (including municipalities directly under the Central Government) has been running for many years. The changing needs of the masses and other Chinese-style major urban diseases are becoming more and more inadequate. How to promote urban grassroots governance innovation, is an urgent and important topic. The reform and innovation practice from the grass-roots level should be considered in theory, and the mode, path and direction of urban grass-roots governance innovation should be clarified so as to facilitate the promotion and popularization of regional innovation practice experience. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and disadvantages of the traditional urban grass-roots management model in China, two extreme orientations of reform and innovation are derived: strengthening control and community autonomy. The former belongs to the mode of "strong government, weak society", and the latter belongs to "small government". The "strong society" model. On this basis, the author puts forward his own point of view: the reform and innovation orientation in line with the national conditions of our country should be the mode of "strong government, good society", and establish and perfect the mode of cooperation and co-administration of multiple subjects in urban grass-roots governance led by the government. This paper analyzes the practice cases of grass-roots governance innovation in provincial capitals of our country, introduces in detail the basic situation and effect of the service management reform in Huangpu District, and excavates its deep significance. The author believes that the reform of Whampoa's "three modernizations" has found a "drug quote" for the treatment of various persistent diseases that have long plagued the urban grass-roots management in our country, and explored the path for transforming the grass-roots governance gene and optimizing the gene combination. It is embodied in "four links": getting rid of the path dependence of the traditional control mode, establishing the effective link between government management and community autonomy, reducing the prevarication of the branch system and establishing the effective link between strip and block; It reduces the antagonistic confrontation between the subject and object of management, establishes the effective link between management and service, broadens the development space of social organization, and establishes the effective link of the construction mechanism of harmonious society between China and the West. This paper also enumerates and analyzes the difficult problems faced by the "three modernizations" service management reform in Huangpu District. The problems encountered in the practice of governance innovation at the grass-roots level in major cities in China are universal, and the fundamental reasons are: Because of the limited management authority, the reform and innovation of urban grassroots is difficult to set foot in deep water area. In view of this, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to further improve the level of urban grass-roots governance from the aspect and macroscopic level, specifically from the promotion of top-level design, the establishment of belief in the rule of law, the coordination of various relationships, the strengthening of service functions, and the construction of the community. To foster social organizations, to promote institutional reform and to innovate governance measures are proposed to deepen the reform in the hope of promoting the renewal of the concept of urban grass-roots governance and the optimization of governance structure through typical guidance, points and aspects. Governance process reengineering, governance subject reconstruction, governance technology innovation, governance gene reengineering, thoroughly get rid of the path dependence of traditional grass-roots management and control mode, and establish a government-led cooperative co-governance model of urban grass-roots governance multi-subject.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D669.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 李鵬;魏濤;;我國城市網(wǎng)格化管理的研究與展望[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2011年01期

2 格里·斯托克,華夏風(fēng);作為理論的治理:五個(gè)論點(diǎn)[J];國際社會(huì)科學(xué)雜志(中文版);1999年01期

3 張振剛;呂君杰;;創(chuàng)新機(jī)制理論的演變與啟示[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2008年05期

4 蔡英輝;;公共云服務(wù):新公共服務(wù)的未來圖景[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2013年01期

5 王拓涵;;關(guān)于創(chuàng)新社會(huì)治理體制的幾個(gè)問題——專訪清華大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)院院長李強(qiáng)教授[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)文萃;2014年07期

6 田毅鵬;;城市社會(huì)管理網(wǎng)格化模式的定位及其未來[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2012年02期

7 張振剛;張小娟;;智慧城市的五維度模型研究[J];中國科技論壇;2014年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：1996238