本文選題：國家重大戰(zhàn)略 + 本體論��； 參考：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：黨的十九大的最重要成果是確立了習(xí)近平新時(shí)代中國特色社會(huì)主義思想的指導(dǎo)地位,作出了新時(shí)代主要矛盾是"人民日益增長的美好生活需要和不平衡不充分的發(fā)展之間的矛盾"的論斷和確定了創(chuàng)造人民美好生活的奮斗目標(biāo)。學(xué)術(shù)研究要為國家重大戰(zhàn)略服務(wù)。本刊圍繞"創(chuàng)造美好生活的學(xué)理基礎(chǔ)"發(fā)表一組文章。《為創(chuàng)造人民美好生活的偉大實(shí)踐提供理論滋養(yǎng)》一文提出,當(dāng)前學(xué)界的一項(xiàng)重大理論任務(wù)就是如何依據(jù)"生存、享受、發(fā)展"三個(gè)層次相統(tǒng)一的原則,科學(xué)闡釋符合我國新時(shí)代的美好生活含義及建立相應(yīng)指標(biāo)體系;如何從生活的邏輯出發(fā),以提升生活質(zhì)量、促進(jìn)人的全面發(fā)展為目標(biāo),實(shí)施超越經(jīng)濟(jì)范疇的"廣義社會(huì)供給側(cè)"結(jié)構(gòu)改革;如何提升生活主體的素質(zhì)和發(fā)揮"生活方式效益",實(shí)現(xiàn)美好生活社會(huì)建構(gòu)和生活者自我建構(gòu)的統(tǒng)一�！�"生活本體論"的回歸與重構(gòu)》和《"生活本體論"建構(gòu)的理論基石及其意義》兩篇文章,分別從不同的理論視角對(duì)王雅林教授的專著《回家的路:重回生活的社會(huì)》作出了理論回應(yīng),前者把該書對(duì)基本理論和概念的創(chuàng)新概括為"四個(gè)為什么",指出作者基于文化自信,所建立的"生活本體論"社會(huì)概念解釋框架是對(duì)西方社會(huì)學(xué)主客體"二分研究范式的超越,為我國實(shí)現(xiàn)以美好生活為目標(biāo)的發(fā)展提供了重要概念基礎(chǔ),后者在梳理馬克思及中外學(xué)術(shù)史的基礎(chǔ)上指出該書從方法論上超越結(jié)構(gòu)論和建構(gòu)論,基于關(guān)系論的理論策略和整體論的學(xué)術(shù)立場,建構(gòu)"生活本體論"社會(huì)范疇的科學(xué)合理性。最后一篇《創(chuàng)造美好生活應(yīng)從尋找生活真相開始》一文指出,如何界定生活范疇是對(duì)社會(huì)學(xué)家智慧的挑戰(zhàn),強(qiáng)調(diào)了如何解釋生活真相(生活事實(shí))、從而把握美好生活生成規(guī)律的重要性。
[Abstract]:The most important achievement of the Party's 19th CPC National Congress is the establishment of the guiding position of the socialist thought with Chinese characteristics in the new era of Xi Jinping. The conclusion that the principal contradiction in the new era is "the contradiction between the growing needs of the people in a better life and the unbalanced and inadequate development" and the determination of the struggle goal for creating a better life for the people. Academic research should serve the country's major strategy. The journal published a series of articles around "the theoretical basis for creating a better Life." the article "providing theoretical nourishment for the great practice of creating a better life for the people" puts forward that one of the major theoretical tasks of the current academic community is how to live and enjoy according to "living and enjoying." The principle of the unity of the three levels of development, the scientific interpretation of the meaning of a better life in the new era of our country and the establishment of a corresponding index system, how to improve the quality of life and promote the overall development of human beings from the logic of life, Carrying out the structural reform of "broad social supply-side" beyond the scope of economy; How to improve the quality of the main body of life and give full play to the "way of life", and realize the unity between the construction of a better life society and the self-construction of the life body. "the return and Reconstruction of the Ontology of Life" and "the Theory of the Construction of the Ontology of Life" "Cornerstone and its significance." two articles, From different theoretical perspectives, the author makes a theoretical response to Professor Wang Yalin's monograph "the way home: a society back to life". The former generalizes the book's innovation of basic theories and concepts as "four Why", and points out that the framework of social concept interpretation of "ontology of life", which is based on cultural self-confidence, is a transcendence of the dichotomous research paradigm of "subject and object" in western sociology. It provides an important conceptual basis for the realization of the development of a better life in China. The latter, on the basis of combing Marx and the academic history of China and foreign countries, points out that the book transcends the theory of structure and constructivism in methodology. Based on the theoretical strategy of relation theory and the academic standpoint of holism, the scientific rationality of social category of "life ontology" is constructed. The final article, "creating a better Life should begin with the search for the Truth of Life", points out that how to define the scope of life is a challenge to sociologists' wisdom. It emphasizes the importance of how to explain the truth of life.
【作者單位】： 哈爾濱工程大學(xué)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)院;哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)編輯部;
【基金】：國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“我國‘新成長階段’生活方式的社會(huì)建構(gòu)功能研究”(17ASH008)
【分類號(hào)】：D61

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 羅強(qiáng);;中國特色社會(huì)主義制度優(yōu)勢(shì)彰顯政治文化自信[J];求是;2012年21期

2 張君;;從文化自信角度看當(dāng)前馬克思主義中國化的困境與出路[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2013年28期

3 楊煌;;增強(qiáng)文化自覺 提升文化自信 實(shí)現(xiàn)文化自強(qiáng)[J];中華魂;2012年15期

4 李盡華;;以堅(jiān)定的文化自信向世界傳播中國夢(mèng)[J];理論學(xué)習(xí);2014年02期

5 朱繼東;;適時(shí)對(duì)改革開放進(jìn)行總結(jié)[J];中國老區(qū)建設(shè);2013年09期

6 胡衛(wèi);;弘揚(yáng)核心價(jià)值觀 增強(qiáng)文化自信[J];民主;2014年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 中共四川省綿陽市委書記 羅強(qiáng);制度優(yōu)勢(shì)彰顯政治文化自信[N];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 徐瑤;社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系視野下文化自信的培育研究[D];大理學(xué)院;2013年

2 葉琴;“四個(gè)自信”的理論與實(shí)踐研究[D];安徽工程大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：1938657