本文選題：臺灣文獻初祖 + 沈光文�。� 參考：《浙江社會科學(xué)》2016年05期

【摘要】：關(guān)于"臺灣文獻初祖"沈光文的研究及其祭祀活動已進行了多年,盡管如此,對沈光文的一些基本信息至今仍然未能明朗。一些原本記載較為確鑿的事,經(jīng)過多年的資料爬梳與解讀,反而變得不那么確切;一些從前無須爭論的事實,在研究者的詬爭中反而變得模糊不清。然而,歷史敘述中的多面鏡像與模棱兩可,并沒有影響在這一人物意義分層上所獲得的相對一致性。事實上,在有關(guān)沈光文的研究與祭祀儀式中,人們通過這一人物去重溫過去并且按照現(xiàn)在的需要將過去重新加以詮釋,人物的鏡像之后永遠存著把握鏡頭的人的主體關(guān)懷。
[Abstract]:Although the study of Shen Guangwen and his sacrificial activities have been carried out for many years, some basic information about Shen Guangwen is still unclear. After years of reading and reading, some of the facts that had been documented more firmly became less precise, and facts that had not previously been disputed had become blurred in the controversy of researchers. However, the multi-aspect mirroring and ambiguity in historical narration do not affect the relative consistency in the stratification of the character's meaning. In fact, in the research and sacrificial ceremony of Shen Guangwen, people relive the past through this character and reinterpret the past according to the needs of the present. After the mirror image of the characters, there is always the main concern of the people who grasp the lens.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【分類號】：D618

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 樂承耀;;牽系兩岸文化情結(jié)的先驅(qū)——紀念沈光文誕辰400周年[J];中共寧波市委黨校學(xué)報;2012年04期

2 樂承耀;;材料、事實與反思:有關(guān)沈光文的“一樁文化史公案”——兼與潘承玉先生商榷[J];中共寧波市委黨校學(xué)報;2012年05期

3 樂承耀;;沈光文文化成就的當(dāng)代價值[J];中共寧波市委黨校學(xué)報;2012年06期

4 萬湘容;;海峽兩岸沈光文研究的歷史分期探討[J];中共寧波市委黨校學(xué)報;2012年06期

5 趙子R，

本文編號：1879284