本文選題：臺灣地區(qū) + 公私協(xié)力��； 參考：《清華大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政任務的行使,原則上應由政府自行為之,非有法令依據(jù),不應任意交由私部門行使。其用意,不外乎在于避免政府不當轉(zhuǎn)嫁其責任,從而規(guī)避公法規(guī)范的約束。故臺灣地區(qū)公私協(xié)力的熱潮,引起了法學界,尤其是公法學界對政府責任承擔的擔憂。本文即通過對臺灣學術(shù)研究成果的系統(tǒng)梳理,分析目前臺灣公私協(xié)力模式下政府承擔責任的范圍。在公私協(xié)力模式下,很重要的議題是政府責任的分擔或共同承擔的問題。為分析臺灣地區(qū)公私協(xié)力模式下政府承擔的責任范圍,本文首先介紹臺灣地區(qū)公私協(xié)力模式的概況,包括起因,法律與政策的發(fā)展歷程,基本含義以及適用的范圍與方式,為后文研究提供基礎(chǔ)概念。其次,通過分析不同責任類型,來確定公私協(xié)力模式下政府所應承擔的責任,即由“給付責任”轉(zhuǎn)向“擔保責任”。進而分析政府承擔“擔保責任”的“憲法”依據(jù)及法理支撐。再次,“擔保責任”的范圍大體上可由法律上的規(guī)定和契約中的約定加以限定,通過梳理學術(shù)成果及實務中的做法來歸納政府“擔保責任”可能的范圍。最后,因臺灣公私協(xié)力模式涉及問題層面廣泛,個案差異較大,政府責任承擔范圍尚無統(tǒng)一的法律法規(guī)可以遵循,造成了實務中的困境。故在學術(shù)界已有學者開始探討建立一部統(tǒng)一適用的“擔保行政法”,從而規(guī)范與界定政府責任的范圍。因大陸學術(shù)界對臺灣此一制度尚未有系統(tǒng)性描述,故本文通過介紹臺灣公私協(xié)力模式下的政府責任,希望能為大陸學者進行相關(guān)研究提供一絲幫助。
[Abstract]:The exercise of administrative tasks should, in principle, be carried out by the government on its own, not on the basis of a decree, but not arbitrarily by the private sector. The intention is to avoid the government passing on its responsibility and avoid the restriction of public law. Therefore, the upsurge of public-private cooperation in Taiwan has aroused the concern of the legal circles, especially the public law circles, about the responsibility of the government. This paper analyzes the scope of the government's responsibility under the public-private cooperation model in Taiwan through the systematic analysis of the academic research achievements in Taiwan. In the model of public-private cooperation, the important issue is the sharing or sharing of government responsibility. In order to analyze the scope of the government's responsibility under the public-private cooperation model in Taiwan, this paper first introduces the general situation of the public-private cooperation model in Taiwan, including the causes, the development course of law and policy, the basic meaning and the scope and method of application. To provide basic concepts for later studies. Secondly, through the analysis of different types of liability, the responsibility of the government should be determined under the model of public-private cooperation, that is, from "pay responsibility" to "guarantee responsibility". Then it analyzes the constitutional basis and legal support for the government to bear the "guarantee responsibility". Thirdly, the scope of "guarantee liability" can be limited by the legal provisions and the agreement in the contract, and the possible scope of the government's "guarantee liability" can be summed up by combing the academic achievements and the practice in practice. Finally, due to the wide range of problems involved in the public-private cooperation model in Taiwan and the large differences in individual cases, there are no uniform laws and regulations to be followed in the scope of government responsibility, resulting in difficulties in practice. Therefore, scholars in academic circles have begun to explore the establishment of a unified application of "guarantee administrative law", so as to regulate and define the scope of government responsibility. Since there is no systematic description of this system in mainland China, this paper, by introducing the responsibility of the government under the model of public-private cooperation in Taiwan, hopes to provide a little help for the relevant research of mainland scholars.
【學位授予單位】：清華大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D675.8

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡敏潔;;合作行政與現(xiàn)代行政法發(fā)展的新方向——讀《合作治理與新行政法》[J];行政法學研究;2012年02期

2 李訓民;;公法契約之控制─從公私合伙架構(gòu)談起[J];行政法學研究;2012年01期

3 莫于川;;公眾參與潮流和參與式行政法制模式——從中國行政法民主化發(fā)展趨勢的視角分析[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2011年04期

4 王克穩(wěn);;政府業(yè)務委托外包的行政法認識[J];中國法學;2011年04期

5 胡敏潔;;履行給付行政任務的私人之法律地位——以養(yǎng)老保障行政為例[J];華東政法大學學報;2011年02期

6 江必新;邵長茂;;社會治理新模式與行政法的第三形態(tài)[J];法學研究;2010年06期

7 章志遠;胡磊;;公私協(xié)力的興起與行政行為理論的變遷[J];山東警察學院學報;2010年06期

8 馮之東;;社會公權(quán)力的司法救濟與民間化——以公私法域交融背景下的足球協(xié)會為研究個案[J];南京大學法律評論;2010年02期

9 劉飛;;試論民營化對中國行政法制之挑戰(zhàn)——民營化浪潮下的行政法思考[J];中國法學;2009年02期

10 黃學賢;陳峰;;試論實現(xiàn)給付行政任務的公私協(xié)力行為[J];南京大學法律評論;2008年Z1期

，

本文編號：1866705