本文選題：歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán) + 歐盟決策��； 參考：《北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)是歐盟多層治理中的重要行為體,對(duì)歐盟決策產(chǎn)生著越來(lái)越重要的影響。從理論意義上,歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)不以相同的國(guó)籍而以相近的意識(shí)形態(tài)為組建基礎(chǔ),正式組建的黨團(tuán)圍繞自己的政治傾向展開(kāi)議會(huì)活動(dòng),歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)通過(guò)歐洲選民直接選舉產(chǎn)生,這種超越國(guó)界的代議制的引入增加了歐盟決策的民主合法性。在實(shí)際運(yùn)作中,歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)對(duì)歐盟決策的影響分為兩個(gè)層面:單個(gè)歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)的活動(dòng)對(duì)歐盟的政策議程、政策提案內(nèi)容及政策結(jié)果的影響和黨團(tuán)內(nèi)部斗爭(zhēng)對(duì)歐盟決策大方向的影響。文章首先分析了歐盟多層治理下的決策特點(diǎn),介紹了歐盟主要的決策機(jī)構(gòu)和決策程序。在歐盟的決策機(jī)構(gòu)中,文章詳細(xì)分析了歐洲議會(huì)與歐盟委員會(huì)、歐盟理事會(huì)共同構(gòu)成影響歐盟決策的三大核心機(jī)構(gòu)的權(quán)力分立和協(xié)作。在歐盟的決策程序中,文章詳細(xì)分析了最普遍使用的共同決策程序(《里斯本條約》以后更名為普通立法程序)的決策過(guò)程。文章總結(jié)了單個(gè)歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)影響歐盟決策的主要途徑,包括在政策形成階段,歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)通過(guò)游說(shuō)、倡議、向歐盟委員會(huì)提出申請(qǐng)等方式影響歐盟委員會(huì)的政策議程決策,在提案草擬階段和提案審核階段影響歐盟委員會(huì)及歐盟理事會(huì)的提案意見(jiàn)以及在投票表決階段可以通過(guò)歐洲議會(huì)直接行使提案否決權(quán)。除了單個(gè)歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)的影響,歐盟的政策決策往往是歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)之間的互動(dòng)的結(jié)果。歐洲議會(huì)中的黨團(tuán)以"左-右"為政治分野進(jìn)行活動(dòng)。歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)之間基于意識(shí)形態(tài)的異同或相互競(jìng)爭(zhēng)或組成聯(lián)盟。黨團(tuán)之間相互競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的結(jié)果往往是使得歐盟決策整體向中間靠攏。黨團(tuán)之間組成聯(lián)盟的結(jié)果往往能確保一份提案得以通過(guò)或被否決。文章以歐盟"關(guān)于建立歐洲就業(yè)服務(wù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)"和"關(guān)于中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng)地位"的決策過(guò)程為例,評(píng)估了歐洲黨團(tuán)分別在歐盟對(duì)內(nèi)事務(wù)和對(duì)外事務(wù)中的影響力。文章試圖圍繞歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)的活動(dòng)更加微觀的分析歐盟的決策機(jī)制,以豐富對(duì)歐盟多層治理尤其是超國(guó)家治理的認(rèn)識(shí),加深對(duì)歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)這一跨國(guó)民主實(shí)踐的理解,為我國(guó)與歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)開(kāi)展黨際交流,以及與歐盟深入交往提供參考。
[Abstract]:The European Parliament caucus is an important actor in the multi-level governance of the European Union, which has a more and more important influence on EU decision-making. Theoretically, the European Parliament caucuses are not based on the same nationality but on the basis of similar ideologies. The formally formed party caucuses carry out parliamentary activities around their own political tendencies, and the European Parliament caucuses are directly elected by European voters. The introduction of a representative system that transcends national boundaries increases the democratic legitimacy of EU decision-making. In practice, the influence of the European Parliament caucus on EU decision-making is divided into two levels: the policy agenda of the European Union as a result of the activities of a single European Parliament caucus. The content of policy proposal and the influence of policy outcome and the influence of inner struggle of the party and caucus on the general direction of EU decision-making. This paper first analyzes the characteristics of decision-making under multi-level governance of the European Union and introduces the main decision-making institutions and procedures of the European Union. In the decision-making organs of the European Union, the paper analyzes in detail the separation of powers and cooperation among the three core institutions, the European Parliament, the European Commission and the Council of the European Union, which together form the three core institutions that affect the decision-making of the European Union. In the EU decision-making process, this paper analyzes in detail the decision process of the most commonly used common decision-making procedure (the Lisbon Treaty was later renamed as the ordinary legislative procedure). This paper summarizes the main ways in which a single European Parliament caucus influences EU decision-making, including in the policy formation stage, the European Parliament caucuses influence the policy agenda decisions of the European Commission by lobbying, proposing and applying to the European Commission. The veto power may be exercised directly through the European Parliament during the drafting and vetting stages of proposals affecting the proposals of the European Commission and the European Council, as well as at the voting stage. Apart from the influence of individual European Parliament caucuses, EU policy decisions are often the result of interaction between the European Parliament caucuses. The European Parliament's caucuses operate on the left-right side of the political divide. Ideological differences or rivalries or coalitions among the European Parliament caucuses. The result of competing caucuses is often to bring the EU decision-making as a whole to the centre. The formation of coalitions between caucuses often ensures that a proposal is passed or rejected. Taking the decision-making process of "establishing European Employment Service Network" and "China's Economic Market position" as examples, this paper evaluates the influence of European Party and Youth League on EU's internal and external affairs, respectively. The article attempts to analyze the decision-making mechanism of the European Union more microscopically around the activities of the European Parliament caucus, in order to enrich the understanding of the multi-level governance of the European Union, especially supranational governance, and to deepen the understanding of this transnational democratic practice of the European Parliament caucus. It provides a reference for China to conduct inter-party exchanges with the European Parliament caucuses and to conduct in-depth exchanges with the European Union.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D814.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 吳向宇;李建芳;;淺析歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)的組織機(jī)構(gòu)與法律保障體系[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2008年05期

2 王明進(jìn);;歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán):一種特殊的政黨組織[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

3 賈旭陽(yáng);;中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨對(duì)外交往簡(jiǎn)訊(5月16日至6月15日)[J];當(dāng)代世界;2011年07期

4 本刊記者;;新起點(diǎn) 新挑戰(zhàn) 新姿態(tài) 新平臺(tái)——記首屆中歐政黨高層論壇[J];當(dāng)代世界;2010年06期

5 劉娟娟;;分享機(jī)遇 共迎挑戰(zhàn) 為中歐發(fā)展注入新動(dòng)力——第四屆中歐政黨高層論壇側(cè)記[J];當(dāng)代世界;2013年05期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 程鵬;論歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)的雙重性[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

2 陳婧;歐洲議會(huì)黨團(tuán)對(duì)歐盟決策的影響分析[D];北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：1813598