本文選題：以色列 + 以色列阿拉伯人　； 參考：《外交學院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：1948年以色列建國后,境內(nèi)存留了約16萬阿拉伯人,根據(jù)以色列《獨立宣言》和《國籍法》,這些阿拉伯人成為了以色列公民。以色列的猶太民族屬性決定了這些阿拉伯人在以色列始終處于邊緣地位,長期受到以色列政府的差別對待。以色列先是對以色列阿拉伯人進行了長達18年的軍事管制,1966年放開軍事管制后,由以色列安全部門負責對他們進行重點監(jiān)察。在這種情況下,以色列國家對于阿拉伯人構建了強制性的權力關系。當以色列對以色列阿拉伯人的強制性權力關系滿足權力關系牢不可破,阿拉伯人服從此權力關系即有利益回報和阿拉伯人不受外部信息影響的三個條件時,這種強制性權力關系便有可能改變以色列阿拉伯人的原有規(guī)范和認同,確立新的規(guī)范和認同。本文通過對1948-1966和1967-1988年兩個階段的分析,可以確定在這種強制性權力關系的作用下,以色列阿拉伯人從不承認以色列建國合法性,不接受以色列公民身份,逐漸到超過80%的人承認以色列建國合法性,接受以色列公民身份;以色列阿拉伯人的政治活動也越發(fā)符合以色列法律法規(guī),非暴力手段成為其政治斗爭的主要方式。同時本文還發(fā)現(xiàn),當該強制性權力關系同時滿足以上三個條件時,規(guī)范和認同構建會較為迅速和徹底;然而當這種強制性權力關系開始松動,無法滿足三個條件時,規(guī)范和認同構建會較為緩慢甚至無法完成。
[Abstract]:After the founding of Israel in 1948, there remained some 160000 Arabs, who became Israeli citizens under the Israeli Declaration of Independence and the Citizenship Act. Israel's Jewish identity determines that these Arabs have always been marginalized in Israel and have been treated differently by the Israeli government for a long time. Israel first imposed 18 years of military control on Israeli Arabs, and after it was lifted in 1966, Israeli security forces were in charge of monitoring them. In this case, the Israeli State established a mandatory power relationship with the Arabs. When Israel's coercive power relationship with the Arabs of Israel meets the unbreakable power relationship, the Arabs accept the three conditions from which the power relationship benefits in return and the Arabs are not affected by external information. This kind of coercive power relationship may change the old norms and identity of the Israeli Arabs and establish new norms and identities. Through an analysis of the two phases of 1948-1966 and 1967-1988, it can be concluded that under the influence of this coercive power relationship, Israeli Arabs never recognize the legitimacy of Israel's statehood and do not accept Israeli citizenship. Gradually more than 80% of the people recognized the legitimacy of Israel's statehood and accepted Israeli citizenship, and Israeli Arabs' political activities were increasingly in line with Israeli laws and regulations, and non-violent means became the main means of political struggle. At the same time, it is also found that when the mandatory power relationship meets the above three conditions, the construction of norms and identification will be more rapid and thorough; however, when the mandatory power relationship begins to loosen, it cannot meet the three conditions. Specification and identity builds can be slow or impossible.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D838.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 趙長峰;;國際政治中的新權力觀[J];社會主義研究;2007年02期

2 黃海;;年輕“混混”與鄉(xiāng)村社會灰色化——以湘北紅鎮(zhèn)“混混”為實證分析對象[J];當代青年研究;2008年12期

3 竹立家;;“改革政府”須優(yōu)先[J];黨政論壇(干部文摘);2007年09期

4 王震中;;國家形成的標志之管見——兼與“四級聚落等級的國家論”商榷(英文)[J];Social Sciences in China;2012年02期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 趙晨林;1948-1988年以色列國家和以色列阿拉伯人關系分析[D];外交學院;2017年

2 李哲;以色列強制性權力與哈馬斯政治立場弱化的建構關系研究（1988-2006）[D];外交學院;2017年

3 周方舟;試析以色列對巴解組織的強制性權力關系及其建構作用[D];外交學院;2017年

，

本文編號：1792535