本文選題：福利實(shí)踐　切入點(diǎn)：社會(huì)邏輯　出處：《社會(huì)學(xué)研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)中國福利實(shí)踐中的福、命、報(bào)等觀念,不是自在的象征系統(tǒng),而是作為融生產(chǎn)性與榨取性為一體的文化,滲透于社倉、義莊、義冢、善堂等福利制度的再生產(chǎn)過程中。因此,作為觀念形態(tài)的象征文化,恰恰是漢人社會(huì)基本聯(lián)結(jié)的粘合劑,其生產(chǎn)性和榨取性力量的結(jié)合,正是傳統(tǒng)中國福利實(shí)踐的"社會(huì)邏輯"。以福、命、報(bào)等基本社會(huì)范疇為中心的一整套象征體系,將土地權(quán)的超經(jīng)濟(jì)強(qiáng)制、國家通過貢賦過度汲取農(nóng)業(yè)剩余、融贏利型經(jīng)紀(jì)和保護(hù)型經(jīng)紀(jì)為一體的鄉(xiāng)紳支配、以"份"為制度形態(tài)的諸種地方公共福利實(shí)踐都整合為一種社會(huì)本體論意義上的支配模式,即象征支配。
[Abstract]:The traditional concepts of happiness, fate and reward in the practice of welfare in China are not a symbol system of freedom, but as a culture of combining production and extraction, which permeate into the reproduction process of welfare systems such as social warehouse, Yizhuang, Yizuzuka and good church.Therefore, the symbolic culture, as an idealistic form, is precisely the binder of the basic social connection of the Han people, and the combination of its productive and extracted power is the "social logic" of the traditional Chinese welfare practice.A whole set of symbolic systems centered on the basic social categories such as blessing, life and reporting forced the super-economic land rights, and the state excessively absorbed the agricultural surplus through the tribute, and the squire dominated by the integration of profit-making brokers and protection-type brokers.The practice of local public welfare, which takes "share" as its institutional form, integrates into a dominant mode in the sense of social ontology, namely symbolic domination.
【作者單位】： 上海大學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)院人類學(xué)與民俗學(xué)研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：D691.9
，

本文編號(hào)：1708911