本文選題：社區(qū)營造模式　切入點(diǎn)：社區(qū)協(xié)商　出處：《西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著改革開放的深入推進(jìn),我國不僅經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)快速發(fā)展,物質(zhì)財(cái)富快速增長,但基層矛盾也越來越突出,尤其是位于城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部的農(nóng)村地區(qū)。我們一直實(shí)行“利益導(dǎo)向”,這在激發(fā)社會(huì)活力、促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展等方面發(fā)揮了巨大作用,但也客觀上強(qiáng)化了社會(huì)的功利主義,對(duì)社會(huì)發(fā)展產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面影響不容忽視�；鶎邮巧鐣�(huì)矛盾集中凸顯的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié),黨的十八屆五中全會(huì)提出,加強(qiáng)和創(chuàng)新社會(huì)治理,推進(jìn)社會(huì)治理精細(xì)化,構(gòu)建全民共建共享的社會(huì)治理格局。各地區(qū)以不同的方式進(jìn)行了社會(huì)治理的探索和創(chuàng)新,社區(qū)營造也隨之發(fā)展,并為社會(huì)治理服務(wù)。自社區(qū)營造在珠三角開展以來,各地均根據(jù)不同地域特色進(jìn)行探索和嘗試,作為社會(huì)工作的一種手段,社區(qū)營造為基層社會(huì)治理工作提供了新思路,尤其是對(duì)農(nóng)村地區(qū)的文化傳承和保育起到了很大的作用。以營造“人”“文”“地”“產(chǎn)”“景”五個(gè)維度為主的社區(qū)營造模式是社區(qū)營造的主流,但經(jīng)過嘗試,這種社區(qū)營造策略并不適合所有村居。筆者認(rèn)為,社區(qū)營造的基礎(chǔ),是村民對(duì)村居環(huán)境、社區(qū)文化、社區(qū)居民和社區(qū)生活方式的熱愛,我們需要找到大家共同關(guān)注的事物,以此為契機(jī)進(jìn)行社區(qū)營造,才能進(jìn)行共同參與、共治共建,達(dá)到社區(qū)營造的目標(biāo)。筆者以小林村社區(qū)營造為研究對(duì)象,在我區(qū)社會(huì)治理的背景和方針指導(dǎo)下,結(jié)合小林村目前的實(shí)際情況,研究分析小林村社區(qū)營造目前存在的困難和問題,探索社區(qū)營造模式,提出符合小林村社區(qū)營造的新對(duì)策。根據(jù)小林村目前的客觀條件以及實(shí)踐材料的分析,除項(xiàng)目定位不準(zhǔn)確之外,項(xiàng)目中還存在溝通機(jī)制不健全、團(tuán)隊(duì)專業(yè)水平不高、項(xiàng)目缺乏專業(yè)支持、服務(wù)參與度低等一系列問題。筆者經(jīng)過對(duì)問題的研究和分析,提出健全溝通機(jī)制、明確項(xiàng)目定位、打造社區(qū)協(xié)商模式等營造策略,其中社區(qū)協(xié)商模式的社區(qū),創(chuàng)造性的以“黨委+社工”為統(tǒng)籌者,通過社工專業(yè)服務(wù),建立協(xié)商體系,引入羅伯特議事規(guī)則,制定章程,明確協(xié)商主體和協(xié)商內(nèi)容,并進(jìn)行監(jiān)控和評(píng)估,形成新的“社區(qū)協(xié)商”模式,最終培養(yǎng)村民共同協(xié)商、共治共建的意識(shí)。社區(qū)營造是一個(gè)過程,尤其是以營造“村民意識(shí)”為最終目標(biāo)的社區(qū)營造,更是漫長,我們的發(fā)展是以人為本的發(fā)展,最終是為了實(shí)現(xiàn)人的全面發(fā)展,而不僅僅是物質(zhì)的富足,“十年樹木,百年樹人”,這個(gè)過程需要社會(huì)各個(gè)方面的共同努力,本文主張通過基層社區(qū)協(xié)商,自主解決社區(qū)營造中的問題,真正做到自組織、自治理、自發(fā)展。筆者認(rèn)為,逐漸消失的村居熟人文化和守望相助傳統(tǒng)比土地帶來的利益更重要,通過社區(qū)協(xié)商模式的社區(qū)營造,社會(huì)工作者與黨委和村民一起探索社會(huì)治理新路徑,凝聚社會(huì)共識(shí),增強(qiáng)社會(huì)認(rèn)同感,使群眾由衷的感到權(quán)益受到了公平的對(duì)待,并實(shí)實(shí)在在享受到了改革成果,共建和諧、有序、健康的美麗村居。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of reform and opening up, our country not only has sustained rapid economic development and rapid growth of material wealth, but the contradictions at the grass-roots level have become more and more prominent. Especially in the rural areas where urban and rural areas are connected. We have been practicing "interest orientation", which has played a great role in stimulating social vitality and promoting economic development, but has objectively strengthened social utilitarianism. The negative impact on social development should not be ignored. The grass-roots level is the key link in which social contradictions are concentrated and highlighted. The Fifth Plenary session of the 18 Central Committee of the Party proposed strengthening and innovating social governance, promoting the refinement of social governance, Construct the social governance pattern that the whole people build together and share. Every region has carried on the exploration and innovation of social governance in different ways, and the community construction has also developed with it, and served the social governance. Since the community construction was launched in the Pearl River Delta, As a means of social work, community building has provided a new way of thinking for grass-roots social governance work. In particular, it has played a great role in cultural inheritance and conservation in rural areas. The community building model, which is based on the five dimensions of "people," "culture," "land," "property," "scenery", is the mainstream of community construction, but it has been tried. This kind of community building strategy is not suitable for all villages. The author believes that the foundation of community building is the villagers' love of the village environment, community culture, community residents and community way of life, and we need to find something that everyone cares about together. Only by taking this as an opportunity to build the community, can we jointly participate in, co-govern and build together to achieve the goal of community building. The author takes the community building in Xiaolin Village as the research object, under the guidance of the background and policy of social governance in our district. According to the current situation of Xiaolin village, the paper studies and analyzes the difficulties and problems existing in community construction in Xiaolin Village, and explores the mode of community construction. According to the analysis of the objective conditions and practical materials of Xiaolin Village, in addition to the inaccurate positioning of the project, the communication mechanism in the project is not perfect, and the professional level of the team is not high. A series of problems, such as lack of professional support, low participation in service and so on, are put forward by the author through the research and analysis of the problems, such as perfecting the communication mechanism, defining the project orientation, creating the community consultation model, and so on. Among them, the community of community consultation mode creatively regards "party committee social worker" as coordinator, through social work professional service, establishes consultation system, introduces Robert's rules of procedure, formulates articles of association, clarifies the subject and content of consultation. Monitoring and evaluation are carried out to form a new mode of "community consultation", which ultimately cultivates the awareness of the villagers to negotiate together and co-govern and build together. Community building is a process, especially the community building, which aims at building "villagers' consciousness". It is also a long time. Our development is a people-oriented development, and the ultimate goal is to realize the all-round development of human beings, not just material affluence. "Ten years of trees and a hundred years of growing people". This process requires the joint efforts of all sectors of society. This paper advocates to solve the problems in community building independently through grass-roots community consultation, so as to truly achieve self-organization, self-governance and self-development. The author believes that the disappearance of the culture of acquaintances and the tradition of keeping watch and helping each other is more important than the benefits brought by the land. Through community building in the community consultation model, social workers, together with party committees and villagers, explore a new path of social governance, consolidate social consensus, strengthen social identity, and make the masses feel that their rights and interests have been treated fairly. And really enjoy the results of the reform, building a harmonious, orderly, healthy beautiful village.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D669.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊俊威;;深圳國際低碳城建設(shè)的優(yōu)勢(shì)、定位及對(duì)策[J];特區(qū)實(shí)踐與理論;2013年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 記者 張文燦;找準(zhǔn)項(xiàng)目定位 以特色引領(lǐng)消費(fèi)[N];武威日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 中國發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略學(xué)研究會(huì)戰(zhàn)略統(tǒng)籌管理評(píng)價(jià)課題組;事業(yè)定位是發(fā)展前提[N];中國證券報(bào);2001年

3 華商;項(xiàng)目定位應(yīng)拋開自我[N];中國房地產(chǎn)報(bào);2003年

4 張建峰 金俊賢;五臺(tái)縣實(shí)施“項(xiàng)目定位”助推經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[N];忻州日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

5 孫蔚;打文化牌開發(fā)商該練什么功[N];中國消費(fèi)者報(bào);2002年

6 記者 葛樹法 通訊員 章燕;余杭部分景區(qū)旅游項(xiàng)目定位好前景好[N];江南游報(bào);2007年

7 李鐸;我們需要什么樣的商業(yè)[N];北京商報(bào);2014年

8 宋峰;新政促大戶型全線改造[N];北京商報(bào);2006年

9 康勝;投資北京小戶型有賺頭嗎？[N];市場報(bào);2003年

10 記者 陳坤　通訊員 李波;生態(tài)至上 投票選商[N];廣西日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 甄朋輝;保定市匯博廣場項(xiàng)目定位及規(guī)劃研究[D];天津大學(xué);2014年

2 莫平;新農(nóng)河路房產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目定位與投資分析[D];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

3 安琳;文化旅游綜合項(xiàng)目定位與策劃研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2016年

4 夏慶;天津市“HH”寫字樓項(xiàng)目定位策劃研究[D];天津大學(xué);2014年

5 羅漢生;衡陽商業(yè)步行街項(xiàng)目定位及實(shí)施研究[D];南華大學(xué);2016年

6 王國順;廣東省珠海市金灣區(qū)小林村社區(qū)營造研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2017年

7 符日輝;中建桂苑項(xiàng)目定位研究[D];中南大學(xué);2005年

8 陸軍;天業(yè)地產(chǎn)濟(jì)南奧體項(xiàng)目定位與營銷策略研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

9 許萌;大型住宅小區(qū)的項(xiàng)目定位與投資決策分析[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2007年

10 潘華林;杭州市智殘人托管中心建設(shè)項(xiàng)目定位與評(píng)價(jià)[D];浙江大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1593232