本文選題：雇傭許可制　切入點：勞務(wù)合作　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中韓兩國地緣相近,文緣相通。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的浪潮及韓國經(jīng)濟(jì)的高速發(fā)展,自從上個世紀(jì)九十年代以來,大量中國勞動力涌入了韓國勞務(wù)市場。韓國的外國勞動力引入制度度過了從產(chǎn)業(yè)研修制向雇傭許可制的演變。在雇傭許可制中韓勞務(wù)合作中,從運行到事后管理都由政府直接負(fù)責(zé),勞務(wù)人員直接與韓國雇主簽訂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞務(wù)合同,形成雇傭合同關(guān)系。兩國政府指定的公共機構(gòu)為勞務(wù)人員提供幫助與服務(wù),不與勞務(wù)人員簽訂任何合同。由此,中韓雇傭制下的法律關(guān)系得以簡化明確,勞動者身份得到承認(rèn)。并且,由公共機構(gòu)運營管理,勞務(wù)派遣過程更為公正透明,勞務(wù)人員權(quán)益得到進(jìn)一步保障。然而,雇傭許可制并非解決外籍勞工問題的完美方案,其自身的缺陷及不足加上外界種種因素的影響,導(dǎo)致了中韓勞務(wù)合作進(jìn)程中爭議的出現(xiàn),既包括勞務(wù)人員與韓國雇主之間圍繞勞動報酬、安全生產(chǎn)、休息休假等發(fā)生的勞務(wù)爭議,也包括派遣過程中勞務(wù)人員與公共機構(gòu)之間因等待時間長,派遣率低及亂收費引發(fā)的矛盾與問題。形成問題的原因多樣:韓國雇傭許可制本身存在的缺陷;雇主惡意侵害勞務(wù)人員權(quán)益;法律法規(guī)的不健全;我國政府機構(gòu)設(shè)置的不合理,工作理念的偏差,效率的低下;對韓勞務(wù)人員素質(zhì)較低等。針對雇傭制下中韓勞務(wù)合作中的問題,文章提出了預(yù)防的建議:第一,改革管理機制,提高派出效率,擴(kuò)大合作規(guī)模;第二,細(xì)化國內(nèi)制度建設(shè),加強雙邊溝通;第三,鞏固政府服務(wù),保護(hù)勞務(wù)人員權(quán)益;第四,強化勞務(wù)人員出國前培訓(xùn)。針對中韓雇傭制下的勞動爭議,文章在分析現(xiàn)行韓國法下的爭議解決方式的基礎(chǔ)上,對北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定下勞工爭端解決機制亦進(jìn)行了整理分析,并加以借鑒,得出對于中韓雇傭制下勞工爭端的解決,應(yīng)以協(xié)商調(diào)解為主,其相對于仲裁訴訟具有成本低、效率高的優(yōu)勢。文章的最后,對中韓雇傭制下勞務(wù)爭議的處理提出了建議。首先,對外勞務(wù)人員應(yīng)通過正當(dāng)途徑解決與雇主間的爭議,避免過激行為;其次,政府應(yīng)加快完善協(xié)商機制,充分重視協(xié)商、調(diào)解的爭議解決方式;最后,應(yīng)謹(jǐn)慎選擇仲裁、訴訟方式解決爭議,并在爭議解決的法律程序中強化雇主的舉證責(zé)任。此課題的研究,讓我們意識到,對中韓勞務(wù)合作方式的探索不應(yīng)止步,雇傭許可制下的中韓勞務(wù)合作仍面臨挑戰(zhàn)。如何更好地預(yù)防及解決爭議,使得中韓勞務(wù)合作能夠更加平順的展開并步入常態(tài)化,值得進(jìn)一步研究與思考。這將對中韓勞務(wù)合作乃至中國與其他所有國家開展勞務(wù)合作都具有積極意義。
[Abstract]:China and South Korea are geographically close, the edge connected. With the rapid development of economic globalization and the South Korean economy, since the last century since 90s, a large number of Chinese labor into the Korean labor market. South Korea's foreign labor into the system had evolved from industrial training system to the employment permit system. In China and South Korea cooperation in labor employment permit system, from operation to post management by the government is directly responsible for personnel, labor standards directly sign labor contract with the employer in South Korea, the formation of the employment contract. Two public institutions designated by the government to provide assistance and services for migrant workers do not sign any contracts with the laborers. Thus, the legal relations between China and South Korea employment system to simplify the clear, workers identity recognized. And, by the operation and management of public institutions, the labor dispatch process more fair and transparent, labor rights and interests further Security. However, the perfect scheme of employment permit system is not to solve the problem of foreign workers, affect their own shortcomings and deficiencies and external factors, led to the emergence of China and South Korea cooperation in the process of labor dispute, both on the labor remuneration, labor service personnel and Korean employers safety production, rest and vacations when labor dispute also, including labor dispatch process and public institutions for waiting for a long time, sending rate and charges caused by the contradictions and problems. The cause of the problems of diversity: defects Korea employment permit system itself; the Employer against malicious labor rights; laws and regulations are not perfect; the government of our country is not set reasonable deviation of the concept of efficiency is low; the Korea labor personnel quality is lower. The labor employment system in the cooperation between China and Korea, article puts forward some preventive suggestions: No. First, the reform of management mechanism, improve the dispatch efficiency, expand the scale of cooperation; second, the construction of domestic refining system, strengthen bilateral communication; third, strengthen government services, protect labor rights and interests; fourth, strengthen personnel training before going abroad. In China and South Korea employment system of labor dispute, based on the analysis of the current South Korean law under the dispute resolution on the basis, the mechanism of the North American Free Trade Agreement under the labor dispute settlement is also analyzed, and reference, obtain employment system of labor dispute in China and South Korea, should be based on the negotiation and mediation, the arbitration procedure has the advantages of low cost, high efficiency advantages. Finally, put forward suggestions to deal with the China and South Korea employment under labor disputes. Firstly, foreign labor service personnel should resolve the dispute between the employer and the right way, to avoid aggressive behavior; secondly, the government should improve the negotiation mechanism Full attention, negotiation, mediation of dispute resolution; finally, should be careful to choose arbitration, litigation to resolve disputes, the burden of proof to strengthen the legal procedures and the employer in the settlement of disputes. The study of this subject, we realized that, on the way to explore the labor cooperation between China and South Korea should not stop, and labor cooperation employment permit the system is still facing challenges. How to better prevent and resolve the dispute, the labor cooperation between China and South Korea to start smoothly and into the normalization, it is worthy of further research and thinking. This will be for the labor cooperation between China and South Korea and China and all other countries carry out labor cooperation has a positive meaning.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D912.5;D822.331.26

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 呂國泉;李嘉娜;淡衛(wèi)軍;王壓非;朱勛克;;中國海外勞務(wù)移民的發(fā)展變遷與管理保護(hù)——以移民工人維權(quán)和爭議處理為中心的分析[J];華僑華人歷史研究;2014年01期

2 崔愛茹;周海平;;中韓雇傭許可制韓國語水平考試的熱與冷[J];國際工程與勞務(wù);2013年11期

3 崔愛茹;;中韓雇傭許可制勞務(wù)合作現(xiàn)狀及對策[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2013年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 金永花;外籍勞動力對韓國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的影響研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 鄭珊珊;延邊朝鮮族地區(qū)對韓勞務(wù)輸出人員的權(quán)益保障研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 賈茹;國際勞務(wù)輸出中的勞工權(quán)益保障法律制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2015年

3 鄭為濟(jì);論區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定中勞工保護(hù)法律問題[D];安徽大學(xué);2015年

4 金明信;中韓勞動爭議處理制度的比較研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年

5 費赫夫;北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1589631