本文關(guān)鍵詞： 深圳市寶安區(qū) “村改居”社區(qū) 社區(qū)公共文化服務(wù) 供給機制　出處：《廣西師范大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：深圳是我國最早施行“村改居”改革的城市之一,也是中國首個率先完成“村改居”工程實現(xiàn)100%城市化的城市。然而“村改居”是項系統(tǒng)的工程,涉及居民身份、生產(chǎn)生活方式、集體經(jīng)濟改制、基層管理體制變更等一系列復雜的內(nèi)容,深圳寶安區(qū)在2004年開始全面進行“村改居”,至今已經(jīng)過十多年的發(fā)展,寶安區(qū)在“村改居”治理和公共文化服務(wù)供給方面做出了大膽的創(chuàng)新和改革,取得的非常顯著的成績。本文以多中心治理理論作為主要理論基礎(chǔ),在實地調(diào)研的基礎(chǔ)上,以寶安區(qū)“村改居”社區(qū)的源起和特征作為切入點,具體從多元供給主體機制、供給運行機制,供給評估機制等三個方面對寶安區(qū)“村改居”社區(qū)公共文化服務(wù)供給的現(xiàn)狀進行詳細的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)寶安區(qū)“村改居”社區(qū)經(jīng)過十多年的發(fā)展和摸索,在公共文化服務(wù)供給中已形成一套獨特的機制,公共文化服務(wù)外包已成為常規(guī)化手段,來自公益組織、志愿者的義務(wù)供給成為公共文化服務(wù)供給強有力的補充手段,在公共文化服務(wù)供給的監(jiān)督上,寶安區(qū)也初步形成了政府監(jiān)督、公民監(jiān)督、社會監(jiān)督的多層次監(jiān)督體系,為保證評估的公正公開和準確,創(chuàng)造性的引入第三方評估機構(gòu)對公共文化服務(wù)進行專業(yè)評估,可以說目前寶安區(qū)的“村改居”社區(qū)公共文化服務(wù)供給機制在國內(nèi)具有一定的科學性和前瞻性,但是經(jīng)過調(diào)查同時也發(fā)現(xiàn),目前寶安區(qū)“村改居”社區(qū)由于受歷史發(fā)展因素、制度慣性、法律法規(guī)不健全等因素的制約,還存在著公共文化服務(wù)多元供給主體間配合和協(xié)調(diào)程度不夠,多中心治理內(nèi)涵要求建立的網(wǎng)絡(luò)化、扁平化的溝通協(xié)調(diào)機制還未完全成型,公共服務(wù)外包中也出現(xiàn)了服務(wù)質(zhì)量差、購買流程不規(guī)范等問題,據(jù)此,筆者針對寶安區(qū)“村改居”社區(qū)公共文化服務(wù)存在的問題提出了三個方面的對策建議:建立多元主體網(wǎng)絡(luò)協(xié)調(diào)機制,并對“村改居”社區(qū)內(nèi)部各組織機構(gòu)間的權(quán)、責、利進行梳理,進一步推動“政企”、“政社”分離改革工作。完善政府購買公共文化服務(wù)的招投標機制與定價機制,健全涵蓋大眾傳媒、社會公眾以及專家在內(nèi)的多元監(jiān)督評價機制,培養(yǎng)“村改居”社區(qū)居民監(jiān)督意識和參與意識,完善公共文化服務(wù)供給的評估反饋機制,繼續(xù)培育和壯大獨立的第三方評估機構(gòu),根據(jù)公共文化服務(wù)的特征建立科學的評估指標體系,確保評估的準確和有效。
[Abstract]:Shenzhen is one of the earliest cities in China to carry out the reform of "village to residence", and it is also the first city in China to complete the project of "changing from village to residence" to realize the urbanization of 100%. However, the project of "changing from village to residence" is a systematic project involving the status of residents. A series of complicated contents, such as production and life style, collective economy reform, grass-roots management system change, etc., in 2004, Baoan District of Shenzhen began to carry out "village change of residence" in an all-round way, and has been developing for more than 10 years. Baoan District has made bold innovations and reforms in the governance of "changing from village to residence" and the provision of public cultural services, and has made remarkable achievements. This paper takes the theory of multi-center governance as the main theoretical basis, and on the basis of field research, Taking the origin and characteristics of the "village to live" community in Baoan District as the starting point, from the pluralistic main supply mechanism and the supply operation mechanism, This paper analyzes in detail the present situation of community public cultural service supply in Baoan District from three aspects, such as supply evaluation mechanism, and finds out that the community of Baoan District has been developing and groping for more than 10 years. In the public cultural service supply has formed a set of unique mechanism, the public cultural service outsourcing has become the regular means, comes from the public welfare organization, volunteer's obligation supply becomes the public cultural service supply powerful supplementary means, With regard to the supervision of the supply of public cultural services, Baoan District has also initially formed a multi-level supervisory system of government supervision, citizen supervision and social supervision, in order to ensure fair, open and accurate evaluation. The creative introduction of third-party evaluation institutions to the professional evaluation of public cultural services can be said that the current "village to live" community public cultural service supply mechanism in Baoan District is scientific and forward-looking in China. However, at the same time, the investigation also found that the current "village change" community in Baoan District is restricted by factors such as historical development, institutional inertia, imperfect laws and regulations, and so on. There is also insufficient cooperation and coordination between the multiple providers of public cultural services, the networking required by the connotation of multi-center governance, the flat communication and coordination mechanism, and the poor service quality in public service outsourcing. On the basis of this, the author puts forward three countermeasures for the problems existing in the community public cultural service in Baoan District: establishing the coordination mechanism of multi-agent network, And combing the rights, responsibilities and benefits among the organizations within the community, and further promoting the reform of the separation of "government and enterprises" and "governance and society", and perfecting the bidding mechanism and pricing mechanism for government purchase of public cultural services. Improve the multiple supervision and evaluation mechanism, including the mass media, the social public and experts, cultivate the sense of supervision and participation of community residents, improve the evaluation and feedback mechanism for the provision of public cultural services, We should continue to cultivate and strengthen independent third-party evaluation institutions and establish a scientific evaluation index system according to the characteristics of public cultural services to ensure the accuracy and effectiveness of the evaluation.
【學位授予單位】：廣西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G249.27;D669.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;深圳市寶安區(qū)觀瀾街道[J];中國綠色畫報;2009年10期

2 譚建光，高偉光，廖運濱;融入城市、輻射農(nóng)村的新移民──深圳市寶安區(qū)1500名外來青年心態(tài)變化的調(diào)查分析[J];當代青年研究;1995年05期

3 ;“四進家庭” 打造美德之家——深圳市寶安區(qū)婦聯(lián)深入開展“美德在我家”活動[J];中國婦運;2006年06期

4 ;廣東省深圳市寶安區(qū)明輝書法工作室點評[J];青少年書法;2013年03期

5 霜木;;撒謊也是“商業(yè)需要”？[J];西江月;2005年01期

6 仗劍天涯;;讓公款喝酒來得更猛烈些吧[J];雜文選刊(中旬版);2010年03期

7 戈林才;“中國黑馬”與他的“經(jīng)濟航母”夢想——記深圳市紅久久實業(yè)發(fā)展有限公司總裁、深圳市寶安區(qū)文化企業(yè)發(fā)展總公司經(jīng)濟信息公司總經(jīng)理王富民[J];中國人才;1999年01期

8 ;廉政廣告語[J];語文建設(shè);2001年06期

9 ;緣分天空[J];西江月;2005年21期

10 向騎龍,高大偉;他,帶出了“全國先進檢察院"——記深圳市寶安區(qū)人民檢察院檢察長梁增昌[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2005年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 趙t熻，

本文編號：1523957