【摘要】：本研究以問卷調(diào)查為主要研究方法,對廣州、東莞、深圳等廣東地區(qū)一線消防員的應(yīng)激(壓力)進(jìn)行了實證性的探索研究。從理論與實證相結(jié)合的角度,探討目前國內(nèi)一線消防員應(yīng)激過程的四個方面,包括心理應(yīng)激源、應(yīng)激反應(yīng)、應(yīng)對方式和社會支持,對四個分問卷的信度、構(gòu)想效度和因素結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行考察。 研究結(jié)果顯示:(1)心理應(yīng)激源包含六個因子:工作情境、干群關(guān)系緊張、社交關(guān)系、消防訓(xùn)練、工作特性、生活事件。問卷信度克倫巴赫a系數(shù)。86,方差解釋量65.6%。(2)應(yīng)激反應(yīng)包含六個因子:焦慮狀態(tài)、身心失調(diào)、精神恍惚、植物神經(jīng)紊亂、興奮過度、反應(yīng)失調(diào)。問卷信度克倫巴赫a系數(shù)。89,方差解釋量67.2%。(3)社會支持包含六個因子:社會人群、長輩、朋友、熟人、師長、其他。問卷信度克倫巴赫a系數(shù)。78,方差解釋量61.5%。(4)應(yīng)對方式包含六個因子:情緒發(fā)泄、娛樂活動、積極的活動、分散注意力、主動消除、尋求幫助。問卷信度克倫巴赫a系數(shù)。73,方差解釋量65.4%。(5)軍銜變量在心理應(yīng)激源、應(yīng)激反應(yīng)、社會支持三個維度差異顯著。(6)文化程度變量在心理應(yīng)激源、社會支持二個維度差異顯著。(7)兵源變量在心理應(yīng)激源、社會支持二個維度差異顯著。 本研究的研究結(jié)果可為有關(guān)部門及基層第一線的消防人員有針對性的采取切實可行的應(yīng)對方法提供客觀依據(jù)和適當(dāng)?shù)膶Σ咝越ㄗh,提高一線消防人員的應(yīng)對能力與技巧。
[Abstract]:In this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the stress (stress) of first-line firefighters in Guangzhou, Dongguan and Shenzhen. From the angle of combination of theory and practice, this paper discusses the four aspects of the stress process of firefighters in China, including the source of psychological stress, stress response, coping style and social support, and the reliability of the four questionnaires. The conception validity and factor structure were investigated. The results showed that: (1) Psychological stressors included six factors: work situation, relationship between cadres and groups, social relationship, fire fighting training, work characteristics and life events. The reliability of the questionnaire was 86 and the variance explanation was 65.6. (2) stress response included six factors: anxiety state, mental disorder, trance, autonomic nerve disorder, excitatory overreaction and reaction disorder. (3) Social support includes six factors: social population, elders, friends, acquaintances, teachers, and others. The reliability of the questionnaire is .78, the variance explanation is 61.5. (4) coping style includes six factors: emotional vent, entertainment, active activity, distraction, active elimination, and seeking help. The reliability of the questionnaire was 0.73, and the variance explanation was 65.4.The (5) the rank variables were significantly different in the three dimensions of psychological stressor, stress response and social support. (6) the educational level variable was in the source of psychological stress. There were significant differences in the two dimensions of social support. (7) there were significant differences between the two dimensions of social support. The results of this study can provide objective basis and appropriate countermeasures for relevant departments and frontline firefighters, and improve the coping ability and skills of frontline firefighters.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：D631.6

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李新旺;白一鷺;;消防員創(chuàng)傷后應(yīng)激障礙研究現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 譚弘;民航飛行員心理應(yīng)激及其相關(guān)因素的關(guān)系研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2007年

2 余江;民航飛行學(xué)生心理應(yīng)激狀況評估系統(tǒng)的開發(fā)研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2394505