闡釋與轉(zhuǎn)化:“忠孝”觀念的現(xiàn)代解讀
[Abstract]:In his later years, Sun Zhongshan reinterpreted the three people's principles, advocated the restoration of Chinese inherent morality and made a modern interpretation of it, which laid down the basic attitude of the Kuomintang towards the Chinese inherent morality, including "loyalty and filial piety". After the outbreak of the War of Resistance against Japan, Jiang Jieshi and the Nationalists, while raising the banner of nationalism, explained the inherent morality of China, including "loyalty and filial piety" in wartime. The modern Neo-Confucianism, the warring States policy party Chinese traditional morals has carried on the thorough exploration, tries to make the "loyal filial piety" the concept to be suitable for the times the new explanation. KMT stresses loyalty to the country and filial piety to the nation, emphasizing loyalty to the KMT and its leaders. The Neo-Confucianism expounded the relationship between the concept of loyalty and filial piety and the family system, paid attention to the change of its connotation, attached importance to loyalty and filial piety, and emphasized loyalty to the nation-state. He Lin's explanation of the traditional "five Lun" concept, Feng Youlan's analysis of "loyalty and filial piety", and Liang Shuming's and Xie Youwei's explanation of the relationship between filial piety and Chinese culture are more prominent. The warring States Policy School, represented by Lin Tongji, systematically studied the traditional Chinese concept of "loyalty and filial piety" from the point of view of the so-called "the world in the great political age", and not only made a new interpretation of the connotation of "loyalty and filial piety" in accordance with the needs of wartime. Moreover, the author openly puts forward the view that loyalty is the first, and emphasizes the principle of "filial piety after loyalty, filial piety before filial piety", and advocates expanding the scope of loyalty and limiting "filial piety" to the family. It is an important way for Chinese traditional moral modernization to explain the concept of loyalty and filial piety and promote its modern transformation. Thus, as the core of Confucian ethics, the concept of "loyalty and filial piety" obtains the opportunity of creative transformation in the pluralistic modern interpretation.
【作者單位】: 中國社會科學(xué)院近代史研究所;河南大學(xué);
【基金】:國家社會科學(xué)基金項目(16KZD021)
【分類號】:B82-092;D693.0
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 高武全;;馮友蘭的道德觀研究[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期
2 楊國榮;人生理想的理性建構(gòu)——論馮友蘭的人生哲學(xué)[J];南京社會科學(xué);1992年01期
3 楊權(quán)利,李建森;簡析中國傳統(tǒng)道德的寬恕思想及其現(xiàn)實意義[J];華夏文化;2000年02期
4 楊海文;《德性源流——中國傳統(tǒng)道德轉(zhuǎn)型研究》介評[J];江海學(xué)刊;2005年05期
5 吳圣正;中國傳統(tǒng)道德的特性及其現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)化[J];船山學(xué)刊;2005年02期
6 關(guān)健英;;怎樣認識中國傳統(tǒng)道德中的“和”[J];紅旗文稿;2006年18期
7 張懷承;;論中國傳統(tǒng)道德的誠信精神及其現(xiàn)代意義[J];道德與文明;2007年02期
8 關(guān)健英;;怎樣認識中國傳統(tǒng)道德中的“和”[J];理論參考;2007年02期
9 周輔成;中國傳統(tǒng)道德中的三個特征[J];冶金政工研究;1994年05期
10 王穎;中國傳統(tǒng)道德研究的新探索——評《中國傳統(tǒng)道德舉要》[J];道德與文明;1997年04期
相關(guān)會議論文 前4條
1 陳德榮;;馮友蘭整體主義社會倫理觀雛論[A];傳統(tǒng)與創(chuàng)新——第四屆馮友蘭學(xué)術(shù)思想研討會論文集[C];2000年
2 方麗春;邵漢明;;中國傳統(tǒng)道德的現(xiàn)代化研究[A];吉林省行政管理學(xué)會“政府管理創(chuàng)新與轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式”學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集(《吉林政報》2010·專刊2)[C];2011年
3 林濱;;以誠信為視角,透視中國傳統(tǒng)道德在當代的承繼與發(fā)展[A];海峽兩岸道德發(fā)展論[C];2008年
4 覃勇;;從傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代差別看道德的繼承和揚棄[A];2003年“求實、創(chuàng)新、發(fā)展——面向新世紀的廣西精神文明建設(shè)”理論研討會論文集[C];2003年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條
1 徐柏才 狄奧;談?wù)勚袊鴤鹘y(tǒng)道德的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)換[N];光明日報;2006年
2 陳澤環(huán) 上海師范大學(xué)中國傳統(tǒng)思想研究所暨哲學(xué)學(xué)院;學(xué)會說中國傳統(tǒng)道德話語[N];中國社會科學(xué)報;2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 秦海珍;馮友蘭道德修養(yǎng)思想研究[D];中南大學(xué);2004年
2 范文文;論中國傳統(tǒng)道德信仰[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號:2159745
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2159745.html