本文選題：規(guī)范性 + 道德的規(guī)范性問(wèn)題��； 參考：《華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：道德的規(guī)范性問(wèn)題是當(dāng)代道德哲學(xué)研究中的一個(gè)核心問(wèn)題。關(guān)于如何解決這一問(wèn)題,目前有兩種方案:一種方案從第一人稱(chēng)的行動(dòng)者動(dòng)機(jī)激發(fā)入手,其代表人物是克里斯蒂娜·科爾斯戈德,認(rèn)為只有行動(dòng)者自身認(rèn)同接受道德要求,才會(huì)打動(dòng)其內(nèi)心;另一種方案從第三人稱(chēng)的理論論證入手,其代表人物是德里克·帕菲特,認(rèn)為只要我們對(duì)道德要求的論證足夠充分合理,就可以勸服行動(dòng)者遵守。從行動(dòng)理由來(lái)理解,道德的規(guī)范性問(wèn)題包含著規(guī)范、證明和激發(fā)三個(gè)維度,根本上是規(guī)范理由與激發(fā)理由之間的張力。為了解決該問(wèn)題,我們需要實(shí)現(xiàn)規(guī)范理由與激發(fā)理由之間的協(xié)調(diào)。
[Abstract]:The normative issue of morality is a core issue in the study of contemporary moral philosophy. There are two ways to solve this problem: one is based on the motivations of the first-person actors, whose representative character is Christina Kolskold, who believes that only the actors themselves agree to accept moral demands. The other approach begins with the third person's theoretical argument, which is represented by Derek Paffitt, who believes that as long as our argument for moral requirements is sufficient and reasonable, we can persuade the actors to abide by it. From the point of view of action reason, the normative problem of morality contains three dimensions: norm, proof and stimulation, which is fundamentally the tension between normative reason and motivating reason. In order to solve this problem, we need to achieve the coordination between normative reasons and motivating reasons.
【作者單位】： 華南師范大學(xué)政治與行政學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究青年基金項(xiàng)目“從‘契約論’看‘道德的規(guī)范性’問(wèn)題”(11YJC720005) 廣東高校優(yōu)秀青年創(chuàng)新人才培養(yǎng)計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目“契約主義建構(gòu)道德如何可能——斯坎倫倫理思想研究”(wym11047)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B82-0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 何茂活;;從河西方志看方言入志的科學(xué)性和規(guī)范性問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)地方志;2007年10期

2 文賢慶;;三種人稱(chēng)立場(chǎng)對(duì)道德規(guī)范性問(wèn)題的回答[J];道德與文明;2013年04期

3 屈衛(wèi)群;張怡;羌麗;錢(qián)娟;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言規(guī)范性的調(diào)查與分析[J];農(nóng)業(yè)圖書(shū)情報(bào)學(xué)刊;2009年01期

4 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2025166