本文選題：會(huì)師武漢 + 李立三�。� 參考：《近代史研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：1930年紅軍在長江中游與列強(qiáng)駐華海軍的沖突,并非如當(dāng)時(shí)列強(qiáng)政府和后世西方學(xué)者所言,是中共盲目"排外"、無端攻擊外艦的結(jié)果。其根源在于英、美、日等國仇視中國的共產(chǎn)主義運(yùn)動(dòng),推行維護(hù)其所謂內(nèi)河航行權(quán)和長江利益的政策,干涉中國革命,并不顧中國平民百姓傷亡,從而引起紅軍和蘇區(qū)群眾針鋒相對(duì)的武力對(duì)抗。盡管紅軍還缺乏足夠的實(shí)力與列強(qiáng)爭(zhēng)勝,但其不甘屈服的反帝精神,連同輿論界要求維護(hù)國家主權(quán)的呼聲,造成了列強(qiáng)"長江共同警備"設(shè)想的流產(chǎn),使其難以對(duì)中國革命實(shí)行大規(guī)模的聯(lián)合武力干涉。此次沖突為中共初步確立兼顧黨的民族解放理想與現(xiàn)實(shí)步驟、結(jié)合革命與外交、區(qū)分帝國主義者與外國人民的反帝政策,以及探索"農(nóng)村包圍城市"的革命道路,提供了寶貴的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。
[Abstract]:The conflict between the Red Army in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and the navies of the foreign powers in China in 1930 was not the result of the blind "exclusion" of foreign affairs by the Chinese Communist Party and its unprovoked attack on foreign ships, as stated by the governments of the foreign powers at that time and the western scholars of later generations. Its roots lie in the communist movement of Britain, the United States and Japan, which hated China, pursued a policy of safeguarding its so-called river navigation rights and the interests of the Yangtze River, interfered with the Chinese revolution, and disregarded the death and injury of the Chinese civilian population. This led to tit-for-tat confrontation between the Red Army and the masses of the Soviet areas. Although the Red Army still lacks sufficient strength to compete with the great powers, its unyielding anti-imperialist spirit, together with the public opinion calling for safeguarding national sovereignty, has resulted in the collapse of the vision of "common vigilance of the Yangtze River" among the great powers. Making it difficult to carry out large-scale joint armed intervention in the Chinese revolution. This conflict has preliminarily established the CPC's national liberation ideal and realistic steps, combined with revolution and diplomacy, distinguished the imperialists from the foreign people's anti-imperialist policy, and explored the revolutionary road of "rural encirclement of cities". It provides valuable experience.
【作者單位】： 中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院近代史研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：D231
，

本文編號(hào)：1895371