本文選題：反腐敗 + 公共工程項目��； 參考：《蘭州交通大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：公共工程又稱為非競爭性項目,是政府為了公眾利益直接或間接投資形成的基礎性建設項目和社會公益性建設項目。近年來由于經(jīng)濟的快速發(fā)展,我國在各方面的能力都得到提高,為了進一步提高人民的生活水平,我國在交通建設、城市規(guī)劃、廉租房或經(jīng)濟適用房建設、校安工程建設等公共性政府投資項目中進行了大量投資建設。然而在快速投資建設公共工程項目的同時工程腐敗問題接踵而至,由于公共工程項目是直接影響人民切身利益和國家綜合發(fā)展的基礎建設,在公共工程項目建設中存在腐敗問題將直接導致工程質(zhì)量存在問題,所以研究公共工程項目廉潔問題具有很重要的意義。論文在國家高壓態(tài)勢反腐的背景下,以公共工程項目廉潔管理為研究對象,在初步了解我國十八大以來的反腐建設及規(guī)范建筑市場領域的相關舉措過程中,通過查閱文獻和分析實事案例總結(jié)了公共工程項目建設在立項審批、設計、招投標、施工、竣工等環(huán)節(jié)的腐敗表現(xiàn),分析了各環(huán)節(jié)的腐敗成因。并在運用舞弊三角論的基礎上構(gòu)建了公共工程項目預防腐敗模型,提出三條反腐路徑:(1)第一條防腐路徑為減輕壓力。政府部門或者公共工程項目建設相關單位具有腐敗壓力(動機)是腐敗發(fā)生的首要條件。第一條路徑從減輕誘發(fā)公共工程項目腐敗的壓力/動機入手,阻斷腐敗發(fā)生的第一個條件,具體實施措施如:提高公職人員的薪酬福利,緩解相關單位生存壓力。(2)第二條防腐路徑為消除機會。消除公共工程項目腐敗機會是預防腐敗的核心部分,腐敗的產(chǎn)生往往是由于建筑市場不成熟、監(jiān)督不到位和相關信息不對稱導致的。第二條防腐路徑采取的具體措施為規(guī)范建筑市場運行機制、構(gòu)建項目集成管理平臺、以政府部門為核心全員參與項目監(jiān)督管理。(3)第三條防腐路徑為祛除借口。借口是腐敗的根源所在,是道德觀念的缺失。祛除政府部門及公共工程項目建設相關單位的腐敗借口,需要從廉潔教育和文化建設方面入手。具體實施措施如:堅定理想信念,加強廉潔教育,弘揚優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化,加快廉政文化建設,制作標桿和模范專題片,傳播正能量。本文最后以兩個實證為背景分析了預防腐敗模型在防治公共工程項目腐敗問題的作用,三條路徑中任何一條路徑都可以阻斷腐敗的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:Public works, also called non-competitive projects, are basic construction projects and social public welfare projects formed by the government directly or indirectly investing for the public benefit.In recent years, due to the rapid economic development, our country's ability in all aspects has been improved. In order to further improve the living standards of the people, our country is building transportation construction, urban planning, low-rent housing or comfortable housing.School safety project construction and other public government investment projects carried out a large number of investment construction.However, along with the rapid investment in the construction of public works projects, the problem of engineering corruption follows one after another. As public works projects are the infrastructure that directly affects the vital interests of the people and the comprehensive development of the country,The problem of corruption in the construction of public works projects will directly lead to the problems of project quality, so it is of great significance to study the problem of cleanliness of public works projects.Under the background of national high pressure anti-corruption, this paper takes the clean management of public works project as the research object, in the process of preliminary understanding the anti-corruption construction and standardization of construction market field since the 18th National Congress of our country.By consulting the literature and analyzing the actual cases, this paper summarizes the corrupt performance of the public project construction in the aspects of project approval, design, bidding, construction and completion, and analyzes the causes of corruption in each link.Based on the theory of fraud triangulation, this paper constructs a corruption prevention model for public works projects, and puts forward three anti-corruption paths: 1) the first anticorrosion path to relieve the pressure.Corruption pressure (motive) is the primary condition of corruption occurring in government departments or related units of public works projects.The first way is to reduce the pressure / motivation to induce corruption in public works projects, to block the first condition of corruption, and to implement specific measures such as increasing the salary and welfare of public officials,Ease the relative unit survival pressure. 2) the second anticorrosion path for eliminating opportunities.The elimination of corruption opportunities in public works projects is the core part of corruption prevention. The emergence of corruption is often caused by the immature construction market, inadequate supervision and asymmetry of relevant information.The concrete measures taken by the second anticorrosive path are to standardize the operation mechanism of the construction market, to construct the integrated management platform of the project, to take the government department as the core personnel to participate in the project supervision and management, and to take the third anticorrosion path as the excuse to dispel it.Excuse is the root of corruption, is the lack of moral sense.To eliminate corruption in government departments and public works projects, we need to start with clean education and cultural construction.Specific implementation measures such as: strengthening ideals and beliefs, strengthening clean education, carrying forward excellent traditional culture, speeding up the construction of clean government culture, making benchmarking and model feature films, spreading positive energy.In the end, this paper analyzes the role of corruption prevention model in the prevention of corruption in public works projects based on two empirical examples. Any one of the three paths can block the occurrence of corruption.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D262.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 鄧麗珊;鄧小鵬;谷甜甜;;大型公共工程風險管理研究[J];工程管理學報;2016年04期

2 陳建國;張禮衛(wèi);;政府公共工程管理的決策和監(jiān)督機制改革研究[J];建筑經(jīng)濟;2016年01期

3 李維;呂彬;;基于舞弊三角論的裝備采辦里程碑審查舞弊問題分析[J];裝甲兵工程學院學報;2014年03期

4 呂予陽;;強化工程廉潔管理有效監(jiān)督的幾點思考[J];南方論刊;2013年02期

5 張蕊;;基于欺詐“三角理論”的國有企業(yè)高管侵占型職務犯罪成因分析[J];當代財經(jīng);2012年05期

6 黎四龍;;會計舞弊三角形理論與舞弊審計[J];統(tǒng)計與咨詢;2006年06期

7 吳祥明;公共投資項目管理的實踐和探索[J];上海交通大學學報;2002年08期

8 陳峗,李彬,鄒慶云;規(guī)范建設項目管理行為與建設工程質(zhì)量[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2002年02期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 丁心海;招投標廉潔風險防控機制研究[D];武漢大學;2013年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 王甲;完善中國反腐敗立法的群眾參與機制研究[D];河北大學;2016年

2 李漢;地方政府腐敗治理中公眾參與有效途徑問題研究[D];吉林大學;2016年

3 姜舒;交通運輸行業(yè)反腐倡廉建設研究[D];南京工業(yè)大學;2015年

4 王曉宇;建設工程項目招投標尋租治理研究[D];重慶大學;2015年

5 祁振興;工程項目建設領域腐敗問題及防控研究[D];大連海事大學;2014年

6 劉萌;上市公司財務報告舞弊識別分析[D];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2014年

7 吳劍峰;公共工程招投標領域的腐敗預防問題研究[D];蘇州大學;2014年

8 李婧妮;我國公共工程項目決策中的專家參與研究[D];西南交通大學;2014年

9 梁爽;基于工程建設領域預防腐敗的系統(tǒng)研究[D];天津大學;2013年

10 周穎;工程領域的腐敗現(xiàn)象的研究與對策[D];上海交通大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1761551