科學(xué)論文內(nèi)容本體比較研究
發(fā)布時間:2019-03-29 06:07
【摘要】:科學(xué)論文內(nèi)容本體規(guī)范地定義了構(gòu)成科學(xué)論文的內(nèi)容組件及其關(guān)系,比較不同本體的差異有助于更全面地理解論文內(nèi)容單元的多維語義屬性,進(jìn)而開發(fā)更完善的富語義出版物模型。在回顧科學(xué)論文內(nèi)容本體產(chǎn)生及發(fā)展歷史基礎(chǔ)上,選取具有代表性的6種科學(xué)論文內(nèi)容本體,從組件及關(guān)系角度分析不同本體的差異,探討其理論根源和應(yīng)用。分析表明,科學(xué)論文內(nèi)容本體類型多樣,但在組件及關(guān)系分類和屬性定義上缺乏統(tǒng)一的理論框架,又因領(lǐng)域和情景差異,在一定程度上制約了內(nèi)容本體的實例化應(yīng)用。未來有必要加強(qiáng)用戶需求研究,進(jìn)一步明確本體開發(fā)方向,提高內(nèi)容本體的可用性。
[Abstract]:The content ontology of scientific papers defines the content components of scientific papers and their relationships. Comparing the differences of different ontologies is helpful to understand the multidimensional semantic attributes of the content units of scientific papers in a more comprehensive way. Then we develop a more perfect semantic publication model. On the basis of reviewing the history of the emergence and development of the content ontology of scientific papers, this paper selects six representative content ontologies of scientific papers, analyzes the differences of different ontologies from the point of view of components and relationships, and probes into the theoretical roots and applications of different ontologies. The analysis shows that there are many types of content ontology in scientific papers, but there is no unified theoretical framework in component and relation classification and attribute definition, and the instantiation application of content ontology is restricted to some extent because of the difference of domain and situation. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen the research of user requirements, further clarify the direction of ontology development, and improve the usability of content ontology.
【作者單位】: 武漢大學(xué)信息管理學(xué)院;武漢大學(xué)信息資源研究中心;
【基金】:中組部“萬人計劃” 教育部“新世紀(jì)優(yōu)秀人才”項目資助
【分類號】:G237.5
本文編號:2449222
[Abstract]:The content ontology of scientific papers defines the content components of scientific papers and their relationships. Comparing the differences of different ontologies is helpful to understand the multidimensional semantic attributes of the content units of scientific papers in a more comprehensive way. Then we develop a more perfect semantic publication model. On the basis of reviewing the history of the emergence and development of the content ontology of scientific papers, this paper selects six representative content ontologies of scientific papers, analyzes the differences of different ontologies from the point of view of components and relationships, and probes into the theoretical roots and applications of different ontologies. The analysis shows that there are many types of content ontology in scientific papers, but there is no unified theoretical framework in component and relation classification and attribute definition, and the instantiation application of content ontology is restricted to some extent because of the difference of domain and situation. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen the research of user requirements, further clarify the direction of ontology development, and improve the usability of content ontology.
【作者單位】: 武漢大學(xué)信息管理學(xué)院;武漢大學(xué)信息資源研究中心;
【基金】:中組部“萬人計劃” 教育部“新世紀(jì)優(yōu)秀人才”項目資助
【分類號】:G237.5
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 姚志昌;鄧群;李成俊;駱振福;;科學(xué)論文價值評價的思考[J];中國科技期刊研究;2005年06期
2 熊家國;;科學(xué)論文引言的寫作及其理論根據(jù)[J];中國科技期刊研究;1996年03期
3 任火;論科學(xué)論文學(xué)術(shù)價值評審中的有限性[J];編輯學(xué)報;1997年03期
4 劉紅;;科學(xué)論文中的不當(dāng)署名與致謝[J];中國科技期刊研究;2005年03期
5 張致浩;在科學(xué)論文編撰中自覺運用美學(xué)規(guī)律[J];編輯學(xué)報;2002年02期
6 徐綱紅;;提高科學(xué)論文學(xué)術(shù)價值的探討[J];技術(shù)與創(chuàng)新管理;2012年02期
7 孫群;汪海英;;科學(xué)論文中概數(shù)用法疏誤例析[J];中國科技期刊研究;2002年03期
8 翦新春;;撰寫及發(fā)表SCI論文之我見[J];上海口腔醫(yī)學(xué);2006年02期
9 劉萍;地學(xué)論文中常見的一些問題及應(yīng)對措施[J];山西地震;2005年02期
10 喬明華;;農(nóng)科科技論文寫作格式及要求[J];貴州農(nóng)學(xué)院學(xué)報;1989年02期
,本文編號:2449222
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2449222.html
最近更新
教材專著