發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-01 10:17

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)發(fā)展至今,網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件層出不窮。與頻發(fā)的各種互聯(lián)網(wǎng)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件相比,原有的著作權(quán)相關(guān)法律已顯得落后。本文以網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)保護(hù)機(jī)制為研究對(duì)象,通過(guò)對(duì)著作權(quán)人、網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者與社會(huì)公眾之間利益平衡等理論分析,結(jié)合“韓寒等作家訴百度文庫(kù)侵權(quán)”糾紛,探討我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)存在的缺陷和難點(diǎn),并且結(jié)合基本法學(xué)原理和司法實(shí)踐,對(duì)完善互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)法律保護(hù)機(jī)制提出一些建議。本文主要分為五個(gè)部分,每個(gè)部分的基本內(nèi)容如下：第一部分為引言,通過(guò)對(duì)“作家訴百度侵權(quán)案”的簡(jiǎn)單分析引出本文的研究對(duì)象：網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)的保護(hù)和限制。第二部分開(kāi)始為正文,簡(jiǎn)述了網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)發(fā)展對(duì)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的影響以及我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀。第三部分是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)保護(hù)的缺陷和難點(diǎn)的考察,結(jié)合“作家訴百度侵權(quán)案”,分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的幾個(gè)難點(diǎn)：合理使用與技術(shù)保護(hù)措施的博弈、網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的責(zé)任機(jī)制、地域管轄的范圍等,指出我國(guó)立法和司法在網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)方面都存在一定缺陷。第四部分從學(xué)理上分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)新的平衡機(jī)制,即傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)保護(hù)中著作權(quán)人和社會(huì)公眾間的利益平衡被互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的出現(xiàn)和發(fā)展所打破,網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)制度應(yīng)當(dāng)滿足著作權(quán)人、網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者和社會(huì)公眾三方利益的平衡。第五部分是對(duì)完善我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的幾點(diǎn)建議,這一部分主要針對(duì)上文中提出的一系列問(wèn)題提出筆者自己的建議,如明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的責(zé)任機(jī)制、建立補(bǔ)償金制度等,以期對(duì)完善我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)保護(hù)制度起到一定作用。
[Abstract]:With the development of Internet technology, the case of copyright infringement under the network environment has been emerging. Compared with the frequent Internet copyright infringement cases, the original copyright-related laws have been lagging behind. In this paper, under the network environment, the copyright protection mechanism is the research object, and through the theoretical analysis of the balance of interests between the copyright owner, the network service provider and the public, this paper discusses the defects and difficulties of the network copyright protection in our country by combining the "Han Han and other writers v. Baidu Library Infringement" disputes. And in combination with the basic law principle and the judicial practice, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the copyright law protection mechanism under the internet environment. This paper is divided into five parts, and the basic contents of each part are as follows: the first part is the introduction, and the research object of this paper is drawn out through the simple analysis of the "The writer v. Baidu's case": the protection and limitation of the copyright under the network environment. The second part is the text, the influence of the development of the network technology on the copyright protection and the current situation of the network copyright protection in our country. The third part is to investigate the defects and difficulties of the copyright protection under the network environment, and combine the "The writer v. Baidu's case" and analyze the difficulties of the network copyright protection: the reasonable use of the game with the technical protection measures, the responsibility mechanism of the network service provider, the scope of the regional jurisdiction, etc., It is pointed out that there are some defects in the protection of network copyright in China's legislation and the administration of justice. The fourth part analyzes the new balance mechanism of the copyright under the network environment, that is, the balance between the copyright owner and the public in the traditional copyright protection is broken by the emergence and development of the Internet technology, and the copyright system under the network environment shall meet the copyright owner. The balance of the three-party interests of the network service provider and the public. The fifth part is a few suggestions to improve the protection of the network copyright in our country, and this part puts forward the author's own suggestions for a series of problems, such as the clear network service provider's liability mechanism, the establishment of the compensation system, etc. In ord to play a certain role in that improvement of the copyright protection system in the network environment of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白慶武;劉晶;;論我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)的法律保護(hù)[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

2 崔艷峰;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)保護(hù)與公共利益的平衡[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

3 王遷;朱健;;技術(shù)措施的“有效性”標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——評(píng)芬蘭DVD—CSS技術(shù)措施保護(hù)案[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年09期

4 肖尤丹;;建構(gòu)和諧網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)生態(tài)的制度路徑[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年04期

5 曹培忠,趙麗,唐紅;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)保護(hù)和完善[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年06期

6 王遷;;視頻分享網(wǎng)站著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題再研究[J];法商研究;2010年01期

7 馮曉青;;技術(shù)措施與著作權(quán)保護(hù)探討[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年04期

8 王遷;;《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》中“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的效力[J];法學(xué);2010年06期

9 周慶安;樊哲旺;;百度案與“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年09期

10 劉大勇;;對(duì)目前我國(guó)著作權(quán)集體管理的幾點(diǎn)認(rèn)識(shí)——從制度到組織的檢視與完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 校元元;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)法利益平衡機(jī)制的建構(gòu)[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

2 李春杰;網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)技術(shù)措施濫用的法律規(guī)制[D];河南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2432336