發(fā)布時間：2019-02-12 11:03

【摘要】：隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,傳統(tǒng)的著作權(quán)制度在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下遭遇了種種困境。網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中存在大量的信息傳播,由此造成的網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下作品的海量授權(quán)問題就是一個重要問題。傳統(tǒng)的“一對一”的授權(quán)方式不但在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中難以實現(xiàn),極大地阻礙了作品的網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播,也不利于維護著作權(quán)主體之間的利益平衡。著作權(quán)默示許可由于其既尊重了著作權(quán)人的意思以及對作品的控制,又提高了作品的許可效率,同時也是一種利益平衡的調(diào)節(jié)工具,因此在實踐中被廣泛應(yīng)用。但同時也引起了一些爭議。本文試圖在學(xué)者們的研究與法律實踐的基礎(chǔ)上,對默示許可在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的適用從整體上進行研究與總結(jié),論述默示許可在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中適用的必要性以及制度價值,對構(gòu)建與完善網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)默示許可制度提出建議。 本文共分四個部分： 第一部分對著作權(quán)默示許可的基礎(chǔ)理論進行了歸納與分析。首先,在總結(jié)其他學(xué)者對默示許可研究的基礎(chǔ)上,對著作權(quán)默示許可的定義與特點進行了歸納總結(jié),并與相關(guān)概念進行比較分析,其次,論述了著作權(quán)默示許可在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的發(fā)展,在比較傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)默示許可與網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中著作權(quán)默示許可的基礎(chǔ)上,探討了網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)默示許可的特點。 第二部分主要對網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)默示許可的法價值進行了論述。通過論述著作權(quán)制度在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中面臨的新困境,以及著作權(quán)默示許可與傳統(tǒng)的利益平衡工具即合理使用、法定許可進行對比,并基于效率之法價值分析、公平之法價值分析等,揭示了著作權(quán)默示許可在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的法價值體現(xiàn)。 第三部分主要分析了中外著作權(quán)默示許可制度的法律實踐。通過對比研究的方法,首先總結(jié)分析了英美法系中默示許可制度比較發(fā)達的美國在法律實踐方面的經(jīng)驗,又分析了大陸法系中日本在著作權(quán)默示許可方面的態(tài)度與實踐,再對比總結(jié)我國著作權(quán)默示許可的法律實踐,分析我國著作權(quán)默示許可法律實踐方面的基礎(chǔ)與不足。 第四部分對構(gòu)建我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)默示許可制度提出建議。首先要擴大網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中著作權(quán)默示許可的適用范圍,將實踐中被普遍承認(rèn)的默示許可規(guī)則從法律上進行確認(rèn)。其次總結(jié)歸納了作為侵權(quán)抗辯事由的默示許可的適用條件,應(yīng)從著作權(quán)人意圖、行業(yè)習(xí)慣于慣例、利益平衡三方面考慮,最后為保障默示制度的運行與實現(xiàn),應(yīng)當(dāng)構(gòu)建與之相應(yīng)的著作權(quán)人利益的保障機制。
[Abstract]:With the development of network technology, the traditional copyright system has encountered various difficulties in the network environment. There is a large amount of information dissemination in the network environment, which is an important problem in the network environment. The traditional way of "one-to-one" authorization is not only difficult to realize in the network environment, but also hinders the transmission of works on the network, and is not conducive to maintaining the balance of interests between the subjects of copyright. Copyright implied license is widely used in practice because it not only respects the intention of the copyright owner and the control of the work, but also improves the efficiency of the work license, and is also a kind of adjusting tool of balance of interests. But it has also caused some controversy. On the basis of the scholars' research and legal practice, this paper attempts to study and summarize the application of implied license in the network environment, and discuss the necessity and institutional value of the application of implied license in the network environment. To construct and perfect the copyright implied license system under the network environment. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part summarizes and analyzes the basic theory of copyright implied license. First of all, on the basis of summarizing other scholars' research on implied license, the definition and characteristics of copyright implied license are summarized and compared with relevant concepts. Secondly, This paper discusses the development of copyright implied license in the network environment, and on the basis of comparing the traditional copyright implied license with the copyright implied license in the network environment, discusses the characteristics of the copyright implied license under the network environment. The second part mainly discusses the legal value of copyright implied license under the network environment. Through discussing the new predicament that copyright system faces in the network environment, and comparing the implied license of copyright with the traditional tool of balance of interests, that is, reasonable use, legal license, and analyzing the value of law based on efficiency. The analysis of the legal value of fairness reveals the legal value of copyright implied license in the network environment. The third part mainly analyzes the legal practice of copyright implied license system in China and foreign countries. By means of comparative study, this paper first summarizes and analyzes the experience of the United States in the legal practice of the developed implied licensing system in the Anglo-American legal system, and also analyzes the attitude and practice of Japan in the civil law system in the aspect of copyright implied licensing. Then the author compares and summarizes the legal practice of implied license of copyright in our country, and analyzes the basis and deficiency of the legal practice of implied license of copyright in our country. In the fourth part, some suggestions are put forward to construct the implied license system of copyright in the network environment of our country. Firstly, it is necessary to expand the scope of application of copyright implied license in the network environment, and confirm the tacit licensing rules that are generally recognized in practice. Secondly, it sums up the applicable conditions of implied license as the reason of tort defense, which should be considered from three aspects: the intention of copyright owner, the trade custom to the convention, the balance of interests, and finally, to ensure the operation and realization of implied system. We should construct the corresponding protection mechanism for the interests of copyright owners.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊圣坤;;合同法上的默示條款制度研究[J];北方法學(xué);2010年02期

2 王秀麗;于秀麗;;授權(quán)要約:數(shù)字版權(quán)貿(mào)易的新模式[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2008年09期

3 張今;;期刊業(yè)數(shù)字化發(fā)展過程中的版權(quán)困境與治理[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2011年03期

4 郭威;;默示許可在版權(quán)法中的演進與趨勢[J];東方法學(xué);2012年03期

5 趙莉;質(zhì)疑網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)中“默示許可”的法律地位[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年12期

6 呂炳斌;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代的版權(quán)默示許可制度——兩起Google案的分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年07期

7 梅術(shù)文;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)默示許可制度的不足與完善[J];法學(xué);2009年06期

8 袁真富;;基于侵權(quán)抗辯之專利默示許可探究[J];法學(xué);2010年12期

9 王璇;;設(shè)立信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)默示許可制度必要性的思考[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年06期

10 李宗輝;;論著作權(quán)的絕對權(quán)性質(zhì)、交易安全保護與默示許可 兼評方正訴寶潔字體侵權(quán)案二審判決[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王琳瀧;我國著作權(quán)默示許可適用研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2420383