【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)的不斷進(jìn)步，我們周圍的網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境也在發(fā)生著翻天覆地的變化。由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)的普及，侵犯版權(quán)的行為越來(lái)越多樣化，傳統(tǒng)的版權(quán)法已經(jīng)不能很好的保護(hù)版權(quán)人的利益了。社會(huì)各界對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商產(chǎn)生版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任的討論也越來(lái)越多，版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)制度的出臺(tái)勢(shì)在必行。 由于法律規(guī)制的不完善，我國(guó)在處理網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商侵權(quán)問題時(shí)主要還是依靠《民法通則》關(guān)于共同侵權(quán)的條款和《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》的相關(guān)規(guī)定來(lái)解決，在《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》實(shí)施之后，雖然當(dāng)中有專門對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商侵權(quán)的規(guī)定，但是因?yàn)閮?nèi)容過于抽象，在適用時(shí)效果不是太理想，因而導(dǎo)致實(shí)務(wù)中很多問題不能得到公平有效的解決，使得網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下如何分配服務(wù)商的責(zé)任成為一個(gè)棘手的問題。 本文先從分析間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任產(chǎn)生的原因入手，強(qiáng)調(diào)構(gòu)建版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)制度的必要性，之后引用大量英美法系相關(guān)的法律和判例對(duì)版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)的概念加以明晰。同時(shí)，本文結(jié)合近幾年國(guó)內(nèi)一些著名的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商版權(quán)侵權(quán)的案件引出國(guó)內(nèi)立法方面的不足并加以分析。通過案件的分析，可以看出雖然我們沒有制定版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)的規(guī)則，但是實(shí)務(wù)中卻經(jīng)常會(huì)用到間接侵權(quán)的相關(guān)概念。 本文在前人探討的基礎(chǔ)之上，，對(duì)幾種網(wǎng)絡(luò)上比較常見的服務(wù)商加以討論，通過對(duì)他們不同功能的分析得出五種不同的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商類型，并對(duì)每種網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的責(zé)任構(gòu)成進(jìn)行討論分析，希望能夠在制定出網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)一般責(zé)任條款的基礎(chǔ)之上，對(duì)每種網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商都有各自特定的要求，完善間接侵權(quán)制度。
[Abstract]:With the continuous progress of society, the network environment around us is also taking place earth-shaking changes. Due to the popularity of the network, copyright infringement is becoming more and more diverse, traditional copyright law has not been able to protect the interests of copyright owners. There are more and more discussions about indirect copyright infringement liability of network service providers, and it is imperative to introduce the system of indirect copyright infringement. Due to the imperfection of legal regulation, our country mainly relies on the joint tort provisions of "General principles of Civil Law" and the relevant provisions of "Protection of Information Network Transmission right" when dealing with the infringement of network service providers. After the implementation of the Tort liability Law, although there are specific provisions for infringement of network service providers, because the content is too abstract, the effect is not too good when applied. As a result, many problems in practice can not be solved fairly and effectively, which makes it a thorny problem how to distribute the responsibility of service providers in the network environment. This paper begins with the analysis of the causes of indirect tort liability, emphasizes the necessity of constructing the system of indirect copyright infringement, and then makes clear the concept of indirect copyright infringement by quoting a large number of relevant laws and precedents in common law systems. At the same time, combined with some famous copyright infringement cases of network service providers in China in recent years, this paper leads to the shortcomings of domestic legislation and analyzes them. Through the analysis of cases, we can see that although we do not make the rules of indirect copyright infringement, we often use the concept of indirect infringement in practice. On the basis of the previous discussions, this paper discusses several common service providers on the network, and obtains five different types of network service providers through the analysis of their different functions. And discuss and analyze the liability constitution of each kind of network service provider, hope that on the basis of making out the general liability clause of indirect infringement of copyright of network service provider, each kind of network service provider has its own specific requirements. Improve the system of indirect infringement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉德良;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)者在侵權(quán)法中的地位與責(zé)任[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年05期

2 王遷;;論“網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為”的界定及其侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年05期

3 謝惠加;;試論著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則的法定化——兼論著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];河北法學(xué);2007年02期

4 薛虹;再論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的版權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];科技與法律;2000年01期

5 王遷;“索尼案”二十年祭——回顧、反思與啟示[J];科技與法律;2004年04期

6 王遷;論版權(quán)法中的間接責(zé)任[J];科技與法律;2005年02期

7 宋紅波;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的侵權(quán)責(zé)任分析[J];蘇州科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期

本文編號(hào)：2161287