版式設(shè)計(jì)的著作權(quán)法保護(hù):排版勞動(dòng)與審美表達(dá)——兼評(píng)吉林美術(shù)出版社訴海南出版社再審案
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-06-25 22:13
本文選題:版式設(shè)計(jì) + 文本版式設(shè)計(jì); 參考:《華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》2015年05期
【摘要】:我國(guó)版式設(shè)計(jì)專有權(quán)的權(quán)利對(duì)象和邊界不清,其根源是錯(cuò)誤地以為版式設(shè)計(jì)專有權(quán)的對(duì)象是"版式設(shè)計(jì)"。版式設(shè)計(jì)受著作權(quán)法保護(hù),正當(dāng)基礎(chǔ)不外乎排版勞動(dòng)與審美表達(dá)。一方面,按照既定的版式設(shè)計(jì)逐頁(yè)手工揀字、對(duì)齊,或者用電腦編輯作品,需要付出實(shí)質(zhì)性勞動(dòng),這適合采用鄰接權(quán)保護(hù)。據(jù)此,只有以原樣復(fù)制此種版式設(shè)計(jì)出版同樣內(nèi)容的圖書期刊才構(gòu)成侵權(quán)。另一方面,以字符作為繪畫創(chuàng)作元素,變形配色并結(jié)合圖案、留白,由此形成的用于宣傳的圖文版式設(shè)計(jì)屬于"作品",其審美表達(dá)如果具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性,則應(yīng)作為美術(shù)作品享有著作權(quán)。在這兩種法理基礎(chǔ)之外,再以鼓勵(lì)創(chuàng)新為由對(duì)"版式設(shè)計(jì)模板"類推適用版式設(shè)計(jì)專有權(quán)保護(hù),不但不能鼓勵(lì)版式設(shè)計(jì)模板直接開發(fā)者投入創(chuàng)新,反而容易導(dǎo)致法律適用混亂。
[Abstract]:The right object and boundary of typography exclusive right in our country are unclear, the root of which is that the object of typography exclusive right is "layout design". Typography is protected by copyright law and is based on typesetting labor and aesthetic expression. On the one hand, according to the established layout design, manually pick words page by page, align, or edit works with computer, need to pay substantive labor, which is suitable for the protection of neighboring rights. Therefore, only the original reproduction of this layout design to publish the same content of books and periodicals constitutes an infringement. On the other hand, taking characters as the elements of painting creation, changing and matching colors and combining patterns, leaving space, the resulting graphic and text layout design for propaganda belongs to "works", if its aesthetic expression is original, It should enjoy copyright as a work of art. In addition to these two kinds of legal theories, the exclusive right to apply layout design to "layout design template" by analogy is protected by encouraging innovation, which not only can not encourage the developers to invest in innovation directly, but also lead to confusion in the application of law.
【作者單位】: 浙江大學(xué)光華法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:D923.41
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王岸英;期刊版式瑣談[J];理論探討;2000年03期
2 李永海;應(yīng)講究版式設(shè)計(jì)[J];w攣胖蕓,
本文編號(hào):2067721
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2067721.html
最近更新
教材專著