本文選題：書法作品 + 權(quán)利屬性��； 參考：《中國出版》2017年22期

【摘要】：書法作品屬于美術(shù)作品,是我國《著作權(quán)法》保護(hù)的對象,但現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律并沒有明確書法作品的屬性。關(guān)于書法作品的性質(zhì)界定,理論上存在形式說、臨摹說與抒發(fā)表現(xiàn)說等不同的觀點(diǎn)。從本質(zhì)上來講,書法作品是作者利用書寫工具與材質(zhì),表達(dá)其思想和情感的作品。在法律上,書法作品應(yīng)當(dāng)具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性、智力成果性與可復(fù)制性。在現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定中,存在書法作品范圍模糊、設(shè)定權(quán)利存在沖突等缺陷,應(yīng)當(dāng)通過相對明確獨(dú)創(chuàng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、遵循在先權(quán)利與利益協(xié)調(diào)的原則予以完善。
[Abstract]:Calligraphy works belong to art works and are protected by copyright Law of our country, but the current relevant laws do not clearly define the nature of calligraphy works. There are different views on the definition of the nature of calligraphy works, such as the theory of form, the theory of copying and the theory of expression. In essence, calligraphy works are works that the author uses writing tools and materials to express his thoughts and feelings. In law, calligraphy should be original, intellectual and replicable. In the existing laws and regulations, the scope of calligraphy works is vague, the right of creation has some defects such as conflict, and so on, which should be perfected through relatively clear and original standards and the principle of the coordination of prior rights and interests.
【作者單位】： 河南科技大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國法學(xué)會項(xiàng)目“精神障礙患者權(quán)利立法保護(hù)”(CLS2015D139) 河南省教育廳人文社科項(xiàng)目“醫(yī)療糾紛調(diào)處中心運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究”(2016-GH-136)系列成果之一
【分類號】：D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王繼安，王化伶;對一起書法作品賠償案的思索[J];人民司法;1994年06期

2 吳意;書法作品也要打假[J];中國律師;1999年09期

，

本文編號：2048686